Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:40 pm
Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:44 pm
Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:01 pm
Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:07 pm
Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:32 pm
Sven wrote:Kellers coming in short-term for Peltier, maybe??![]()
![]()
FFS, they were watching a football match together!![]()
Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:33 pm
ThomasC wrote:Sven wrote:Kellers coming in short-term for Peltier, maybe??![]()
![]()
FFS, they were watching a football match together!![]()
And where is the insinuation it was anything else than that Sven? I can't see it
Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:48 pm
RumneyBluebird wrote:ThomasC wrote:Sven wrote:Kellers coming in short-term for Peltier, maybe??![]()
![]()
FFS, they were watching a football match together!![]()
And where is the insinuation it was anything else than that Sven? I can't see it
Neither can I actually
Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:46 pm
Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:48 pm
polo wrote:How can a moderator on this forum take the moral high ground on mis leading thread titles and insinuations?
Sven, do you pick Annis up with the same condescending arrogance?
No thought not
Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:58 pm
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:01 pm
Sven wrote:RumneyBluebird wrote:ThomasC wrote:Sven wrote:Kellers coming in short-term for Peltier, maybe??![]()
![]()
FFS, they were watching a football match together!![]()
And where is the insinuation it was anything else than that Sven? I can't see it
Neither can I actually
Then why did you start the thread and put it on here in that format?![]()
If you'd written that the Development Team had played Bristol City today, gaining another 2-0 win and, by the way, RS sat with CB it would make a difference in context. But no, you had to mention the seating arrangements first!
To me, after reading it again, the insinuation that there may be 'something in it' is clear, but obviously others can read it how they see it, too!
It doesn't really matter tbh, but I think you knew what you were doing!
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:01 pm
polo wrote:How can a moderator on this forum take the moral high ground on mis leading thread titles and insinuations?
Sven, do you pick Annis up with the same condescending arrogance?
No thought not
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:02 pm
RumneyBluebird wrote:polo wrote:How can a moderator on this forum take the moral high ground on mis leading thread titles and insinuations?
Sven, do you pick Annis up with the same condescending arrogance?
No thought not
The irony eh?
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:04 pm
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:05 pm
RumneyBluebird wrote:Sven deleted my comment as well because I joked that he spelled Bellamy's name wrong and then had to cover it up, this guy is a joke
Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:20 pm
polo wrote:RumneyBluebird wrote:Sven deleted my comment as well because I joked that he spelled Bellamy's name wrong and then had to cover it up, this guy is a joke
Laughable
I had a similar issue a few weeks back.
Tue Mar 08, 2016 6:56 pm
Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:18 pm
stephendavid wrote:He's gone awfully quiet old MR goran eriksson![]()
Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:00 am
Sven wrote:stephendavid wrote:He's gone awfully quiet old MR goran eriksson![]()
Oh dear, Mr stephendavid![]()
Not gone quiet at all![]()
What I did do (and I'm sure he will verify) is contact RumneyBluebird with a personal apology once I realised I had gone a little OTT and it was accepted
I am big enough to do that when I need to
I could understand why a couple of bandwagon jumpers were straight on the case and in one instance (certainly not you, though) a comment made had some substance!
I understand why you would want to 'have a pop' after you were warned recently, although I had thought it was sorted after your responses. Obviously not!
Given the apology and acceptance of my own, there was no real need to perpetuate the thread by either myself or RumneyBluebird, was there?
Sorry if that doesn't suit your agenda, though!![]()