Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:20 am
Fri Feb 26, 2016 12:25 pm
Fri Feb 26, 2016 2:30 pm
Fri Feb 26, 2016 2:43 pm
davids wrote:Sam gambled and lost.
In my opinion he was only ever in it for the money - that's fine but all this "in it together" and us being his "family" was a load of old cobblers.
He was a chancer who came up short. Unfortunately for him Tan has the money to walk the walk - all Sam could do was talk the talk.
Hopefully they'll also remove his "Life Presidency" or whatever title he still holds at the club and sever all ties with him completely.
Fri Feb 26, 2016 2:50 pm
davids wrote:Sam gambled and lost.
In my opinion he was only ever in it for the money - that's fine but all this "in it together" and us being his "family" was a load of old cobblers.
He was a chancer who came up short. Unfortunately for him Tan has the money to walk the walk - all Sam could do was talk the talk.
Hopefully they'll also remove his "Life Presidency" or whatever title he still holds at the club and sever all ties with him completely.
Fri Feb 26, 2016 4:06 pm
Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:36 pm
Sat Feb 27, 2016 7:22 am
grange_end1927 wrote:It looks like Langston got all the money in the end and costly to Tan
Sat Feb 27, 2016 10:58 am
Wayne S wrote:grange_end1927 wrote:It looks like Langston got all the money in the end and costly to Tan
That's the bit that sticks in the throat. "Got all his money back".
Set up and offshore fund to anonimise the investment so that he could say that it was "someone else" asking for the loan back.
NEVER had the intention of just taking equity in the club but would have happily reaped the benefits had we made it big during his tenure.
No risk for him really. All the risk was the clubs especially when there were threats of administration from, the once unknown, Langston.
But hey ho, he got his money back, the cheeky chappy that he is. Look at that face, look at it, you gotta love him. He was one of us, he often told us he loved us.
Sat Feb 27, 2016 11:38 am
Blueboys1927 wrote:davids wrote:Sam gambled and lost.
In my opinion he was only ever in it for the money - that's fine but all this "in it together" and us being his "family" was a load of old cobblers.
He was a chancer who came up short. Unfortunately for him Tan has the money to walk the walk - all Sam could do was talk the talk.
Hopefully they'll also remove his "Life Presidency" or whatever title he still holds at the club and sever all ties with him completely.
Don't you mean Sam gambled and won, he got all his money back and in the process shafted Dictator Tan. And the funniest thing of it all is that he still sits as Life President of the club
Sat Feb 27, 2016 11:50 am
Sneggyblubird wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:davids wrote:Sam gambled and lost.
In my opinion he was only ever in it for the money - that's fine but all this "in it together" and us being his "family" was a load of old cobblers.
He was a chancer who came up short. Unfortunately for him Tan has the money to walk the walk - all Sam could do was talk the talk.
Hopefully they'll also remove his "Life Presidency" or whatever title he still holds at the club and sever all ties with him completely.
Don't you mean Sam gambled and won, he got all his money back and in the process shafted Dictator Tan. And the funniest thing of it all is that he still sits as Life President of the club
All the Hamman arse lickers are the real enemy of our club.Dictator Tan is still here helping the club.Only the braindead amoung us would now deny that.