Making a murderer - Netflix

Anyone seen it and care to share opinions?

Seen it a while back the guy got stitched right up

I think I agree although it was made to make you think that was the case

Your right there,a good watch all the same

Agree it was a good watch. Court room arguments for the defense and prosecution were interesting.

To say the least lol

I reckon he was stitched and I do feel sorry for him but talk about a family of hillbillies!

Wouldn't be surprised if he was his own Dad!

Hahahaha you could be right about that mate!right bunch of oddballs

Lol and his weirdo girlfriend at the end. WTF was she all about?

Lol your bang on the money though what a bunch of hillbillies hahaha

I suspect his new lawyer will get his conviction thrown out. The lady is a f*cking beast, and is all over it.

What didnt make sense to me was they found no DNA evidence in his trailer or garage bar that dodgy bullet in his garage and convicted Avery

Yet in that kids trial that convicted him on his confessions to killing her in Averys trailer.

Now if he/they had killed her in the trailer or garage then there would definitely be blood etc all over the place. No way they would have cleaned that up with no trace

That's true and let's be honest they didn't look the brightest of people did they?lol

What didnt make sense to me was they found no DNA evidence in his trailer or garage bar that dodgy bullet in his garage and convicted Avery

Yet in that kids trial that convicted him on his confessions to killing her in Averys trailer.

Now if he/they had killed her in the trailer or garage then there would definitely be blood etc all over the place. No way they would have cleaned that up with no trace

also she was supposed to of been stabbed,throat slit and shot 11 times in the head yet not 1 drop of her blood found anywhere only Averys blood.

Also what doesn'r make sense to me is that she was supposedly burned right outside Averys house yet part of her body was found in a quarry. If he did burn her outside his house why would he take only small amount of her to the quarry and leave the rest right outside his house , or the other way around if he burned her at the quarry then why would he think I know I'll bury her right outside my house . There's so many things that don't add up, he deserves a fair trial

What didnt make sense to me was they found no DNA evidence in his trailer or garage bar that dodgy bullet in his garage and convicted Avery

Yet in that kids trial that convicted him on his confessions to killing her in Averys trailer.

Now if he/they had killed her in the trailer or garage then there would definitely be blood etc all over the place. No way they would have cleaned that up with no trace

also she was supposed to of been stabbed,throat slit and shot 11 times in the head yet not 1 drop of her blood found anywhere only Averys blood.

Also what doesn'r make sense to me is that she was supposedly burned right outside Averys house yet part of her body was found in a quarry. If he did burn her outside his house why would he take only small amount of her to the quarry and leave the rest right outside his house , or the other way around if he burned her at the quarry then why would he think I know I'll bury her right outside my house . There's so many things that don't add up, he deserves a fair trial

Also that woman who "found" the RAV4 within 10 minutes of searching on Averys 60 acre property (that seems to convenient she was told where to look imo)
The sheriff calling for a licence plate check then confirming on the radio that it was the RAV4 Toyota a few days after she had been on Averys property. (He seen that vehicle as otherwise why call it in )

It was compelling viewing. How he doesn't get a re trial at the very least I don't know. How can they not think those car keys weren't planted after 7 previous searches and then found by a officer who shouldn't be involed in search for that very reason. Lol.

Also unless I missed it what reason did they have for him killing her? What did she do to him?

It was compelling viewing. How he doesn't get a re trial at the very least I don't know. How can they not think those car keys weren't planted after 7 previous searches and then found by a officer who shouldn't be involed in search for that very reason. Lol.

Also unless I missed it what reason did they have for him killing her? What did she do to him?

Not sure but Avery personally asked for her to come and used a false name whilst on the phone. Which is suspicious but I still think he was stitched up.

Also people on here saying they found no DNA evidence, they found Averys sweat on the hood of the RAV4, but still no blood.

It was compelling viewing. How he doesn't get a re trial at the very least I don't know. How can they not think those car keys weren't planted after 7 previous searches and then found by a officer who shouldn't be involed in search for that very reason. Lol.

Also unless I missed it what reason did they have for him killing her? What did she do to him?

Not sure but Avery personally asked for her to come and used a false name whilst on the phone. Which is suspicious but I still think he was stitched up.

Also people on here saying they found no DNA evidence, they found Averys sweat on the hood of the RAV4, but still no blood.

The whole "asked for her specifically" thing that's been thrown around as missing evidence on the show is slightly misleading too. Supposedly she was the only photographer for the magazine who operated in those areas anyway, which Avery knew, so he was more than likely just saying to send her down to get the photos taken rather than specifically asking them to send her instead of anyone else - there WASN'T anyone else.

The whole thing is bullshit really.

It was compelling viewing. How he doesn't get a re trial at the very least I don't know. How can they not think those car keys weren't planted after 7 previous searches and then found by a officer who shouldn't be involed in search for that very reason. Lol.

Also unless I missed it what reason did they have for him killing her? What did she do to him?

Not sure but Avery personally asked for her to come and used a false name whilst on the phone. Which is suspicious but I still think he was stitched up.

Also people on here saying they found no DNA evidence, they found Averys sweat on the hood of the RAV4, but still no blood.

The whole "asked for her specifically" thing that's been thrown around as missing evidence on the show is slightly misleading too. Supposedly she was the only photographer for the magazine who operated in those areas anyway, which Avery knew, so he was more than likely just saying to send her down to get the photos taken rather than specifically asking them to send her instead of anyone else - there WASN'T anyone else.

The whole thing is bullshit really.

Even if that is true, it would still lead to good evidence against Avery if you get me. Sad but true.

I can't belive have bad the kids first lawyer was.

Anyone watching the oj v the people on bbc 2?

It was compelling viewing. How he doesn't get a re trial at the very least I don't know. How can they not think those car keys weren't planted after 7 previous searches and then found by a officer who shouldn't be involed in search for that very reason. Lol.

Also unless I missed it what reason did they have for him killing her? What did she do to him?

Not sure but Avery personally asked for her to come and used a false name whilst on the phone. Which is suspicious but I still think he was stitched up.

Also people on here saying they found no DNA evidence, they found Averys sweat on the hood of the RAV4, but still no blood.

Sweat doesn't have DNA

Zellner has been tweeting that she has an airtight alibi that Teresa left property and Avery didn't . Also she says FACT one person gave cops false name to search averys property

An appeal has been made recently due to the evidence viewers have seen to suggest avery is innocent. Think it's due this or next year

An appeal has been made recently due to the evidence viewers have seen to suggest avery is innocent. Think it's due this or next year

He was due a bail hearing yesterday, but the prosecution requested more time to put together their response to the evidence of police corruption that has been filed by Avery's lawyers.

What was seen on the show as supposed proof of his innocence is not in play here, however. All new evidence, and judging from what I'm seeing of what has been uncovered and posted online, it's all pretty damning and not at all on Avery.

An appeal has been made recently due to the evidence viewers have seen to suggest avery is innocent. Think it's due this or next year

He was due a bail hearing yesterday, but the prosecution requested more time to put together their response to the evidence of police corruption that has been filed by Avery's lawyers.

What was seen on the show as supposed proof of his innocence is not in play here, however. All new evidence, and judging from what I'm seeing of what has been uncovered and posted online, it's all pretty damning and not at all on Avery.

From what Kathleen Zellner(Averys new attourney ) is saying on her twitter account sounds like she has scientific evidence to prove evidence was planted , also saying she has an airtight alibi that Teressa left his property and Avery didn't. Does seem that Avery was stichted up big time by the sound of it . I'd assume if Avery has a neew trial then surely his nephew Brendan would get one

Just looked at her twitter and wow she tweets a lot of details. Is this normal? Won't it damage her case? Or is she try to raise the public opinion that avert is innocent.

Just looked at her twitter and wow she tweets a lot of details. Is this normal? Won't it damage her case? Or is she try to raise the public opinion that avert is innocent.

I don't think she's tweeted anywhere near as much info as she's actually now got though - the roof is going to blow off this thing, I'm sure. I suspect she's putting the small tidbits out that she has, in an attempt to get some people to shit themselves and whistleblow to her.

Just looked at her twitter and wow she tweets a lot of details. Is this normal? Won't it damage her case? Or is she try to raise the public opinion that avert is innocent.

I thought it was weird she's tweeting so much but then I thought she's basically doing what the prosecution did in his original trial. Also think she has alot more stuff up her sleeve than she is tweeting about. The intersting one for me is the tweet saying about Teressa leaving his property and Avery didn't

I bet there's a load of people shit bricks as we speak. Brendan's older brother for one.

I bet there's a load of people shit bricks as we speak. Brendan's older brother for one.

ye he looked dodgy, also Teressa brother and ex boyfriend something seems really dodgy about them hacking Tersessa phone and suddenly messages had been erased