Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:38 pm
Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:39 pm
Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:15 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Excuses.
Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:21 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Excuses.
No fact actually
Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:59 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Excuses.
No fact actually
Not good enough though why play with two attacking Midfielders up front when he could've given Zohore a try.
Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:28 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Excuses.
No fact actually
Not good enough though why play with two attacking Midfielders up front when he could've given Zohore a try.
I can't understand how anyone can be disappointed with our performance today. It's not Slade's fault goals have been taken out of our team by those above him not managing our clubs finances properly.
Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:26 am
worcester_ccfc wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Excuses.
No fact actually
Not good enough though why play with two attacking Midfielders up front when he could've given Zohore a try.
I can't understand how anyone can be disappointed with our performance today. It's not Slade's fault goals have been taken out of our team by those above him not managing our clubs finances properly.
Tonteg, I've got to say fair play to you. You have stuck by Slade and defended him time after time when a lot of us have doubted him. I didn't always agree with you, but always good to see someone stick to what they say.
I've criticised Slade since the early days of his reign but did anyone really expect us to be within touch of the play-offs towards the end of February with him in charge and the cut-backs? I know I didn't. He deserves credit for that, a lot of players have gone for business decisions and I'm sure he would have liked to have kept those players.
I still don't think he's the man to take us up, and I don't think many of us expect him to be with us next season. But he has done a good job under the circumstances. I've said it this weekend that if he goes in the summer, I think he'll come out of it looking better than the club.
As for today, you can't blame Slade. I don't think they're excuses, ironic that Rydog should say that given how he's done the biggest u-turn ever known in six months, Slade is just being honest. He knows we need a proven goalscorer but that was extremely difficult with the transfer restrictions we had.
We played well today, but couldn't get the goals. I think it's harsh to blame that on Slade, given our performance.
Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:33 am
Sun Feb 14, 2016 5:53 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Hey guys I'm not denying Slade is doing a good job but he can be really frustrating at times why have 2 players that not strikers upfront and going back to 442 when we played 4231 and it worked a treat and he moans about why we are not scoring its really frustrating.
Sun Feb 14, 2016 5:55 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Hey guys I'm not denying Slade is doing a good job but he can be really frustrating at times why have 2 players that not strikers upfront and going back to 442 when we played 4231 and it worked a treat and he moans about why we are not scoring its really frustrating.
Was you saying that after we scored 3 goals at Huddersfield with Pilkington and Immers up front? If you watch the highlights, you will see Pilkington had another good game and was involved with the majority of our chances.
I also believe we played 4-2-3-1 yesterday with Tom Lawrence in the number 10 role behind Pilkington.