Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:57 am
Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:23 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:35 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:47 pm
paulh_85 wrote:admits to one count of sexual activity with a child
pleads not guilty to two counts of sexual activity with someone under 16
can someone explain the difference here please?
Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:57 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:01 pm
paulh_85 wrote:admits to one count of sexual activity with a child
pleads not guilty to two counts of sexual activity with someone under 16
can someone explain the difference here please?
Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:01 pm
Wolfpac wrote:Sunderland should terminate his contract with immediate effect !!!
He's admitted sexual activity with a minor, the guy's a nonce, simple as that.
I don't care if the girl in question looked older, he knew she was underage so he understood the repurcussions.
Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:35 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:45 pm
Igovernor wrote:The kissing part, its quite possible that he did not know her age, if he met her out and about, but the important thing here is that he groomed her on the internet, so to me he is a pedophile and should be jailed
Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:47 pm
Igovernor wrote:The kissing part, its quite possible that he did not know her age, if he met her out and about, but the important thing here is that he groomed her on the internet, so to me he is a pedophile and should be jailed
Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:52 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Igovernor wrote:The kissing part, its quite possible that he did not know her age, if he met her out and about, but the important thing here is that he groomed her on the internet, so to me he is a pedophile and should be jailed
Didn't realise that, thought he met her in a club
Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:01 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:54 pm
Igovernor wrote:He groomed her on the internet, he has admitted that, then he probably arranged to meet her, maybe at a club
Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:56 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:49 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:12 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:16 pm
paulh_85 wrote:not sure i would use the term peadophile if she was 15, but then it goes against this countries laws so i wouldnt be surprised if he went to prison.
Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:25 pm
Trigger wrote:paulh_85 wrote:not sure i would use the term peadophile if she was 15, but then it goes against this countries laws so i wouldnt be surprised if he went to prison.
See http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/s9_sexual_activity_with_a_child/ for likely sentencing outcome.
Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:35 pm
paulh_85 wrote:not sure i would use the term peadophile if she was 15, but then it goes against this countries laws so i wouldnt be surprised if he went to prison.
Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:43 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:paulh_85 wrote:not sure i would use the term peadophile if she was 15, but then it goes against this countries laws so i wouldnt be surprised if he went to prison.
Technically he is a paedophile, as he's admitted sexual activity with a minor. Quite sure it would be the same even if she was 16/17, as he's in a position of trust - but not 100% if a footballer is seen as a 'position of trust' by the court.
Will be shocked if he escapes prison.
Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:45 pm
Wolfpac wrote:Sunderland should terminate his contract with immediate effect !!!
He's admitted sexual activity with a minor, the guy's a nonce, simple as that.
I don't care if the girl in question looked older, he knew she was underage so he understood the repurcussions.
Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:52 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:49 pm
polo wrote:Got a smart missus, kid on the way, living in a mansion, earning millions of pounds a year, made for life.
Why oh why would you risk all that for a fumble about with a 15 year old schoolgirl. Absolute wrong un.
Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:55 pm
polo wrote:Got a smart missus, kid on the way, living in a mansion, earning millions of pounds a year, made for life.
Why oh why would you risk all that for a fumble about with a 15 year old schoolgirl. Absolute wrong un.
Wed Feb 10, 2016 6:49 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:18 pm
The12thBlue wrote:Holding back until Friday when more is released, because at the moment we don't know the full facts.
But what I do know is that he's a stupid idiot for simply cheating on his missus (who is pretty hot), the lad is a very decent football player and he's almost fucked that up for him self at 28, If he is acquitted on all charges then I can only see him staying at Sunderland for the rest of his career or moving abroad because I doubt any Prem team will go after him now
Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 pm
Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:22 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:His missus has stood by him which I find incredible. I would bet everything I got that if they were married she would be filing divorce right now and she'd get a very very handsome pay off!
Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:55 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:His missus has stood by him which I find incredible. I would bet everything I got that if they were married she would be filing divorce right now and she'd get a very very handsome pay off!
I would hope money has nothing to do with it. No amount of money is going to help in this case and hes about to stop earning
Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:00 am
The12thBlue wrote:Holding back until Friday when more is released, because at the moment we don't know the full facts.
But what I do know is that he's a stupid idiot for simply cheating on his missus (who is pretty hot), the lad is a very decent football player and he's almost fucked that up for him self at 28, If he is acquitted on all charges then I can only see him staying at Sunderland for the rest of his career or moving abroad because I doubt any Prem team will go after him now