So if SAM is LANGSTON then ?

If this solicitor Chris Nott at Capitol Law has got such a document stating Sam is Langston then why don't people go find out ?

There's been so much said and abuse chucked about on here its bonkers when there's a simple solution below.

Its only a case of emailing the company as all the company employees emails and numbers are online for all to see.

Id like to see his answers to be honest as it was him who has told the media that Sam is Langston according the media story.

Email him yourself - c.nott@capitallaw.co.uk

For them who want to know ask him if such a document exists, he will probably say its confidential if he does reply

Although that would be bollocks wouldn't it, if he replied saying its confidential, how can that be as the media have said he told them Sam is Langston and a document does exist


So come on let's stop the abuse and get some actual facts put on here by Capitol Law and start emailing them and see the replies?

Stick your emails on here id love to see the truth

If this solicitor Chris Nott at Capitol Law has got such a document stating Sam is Langston then why don't people go find out ?

There's been so much said and abuse chucked about on here its bonkers when there's a simple solution below.

Its only a case of emailing the company as all the company employees emails and numbers are online for all to see.

Id like to see his answers to be honest as it was him who has told the media that Sam is Langston according the media story.

Email him yourself - c.nott@capitallaw.co.uk

For them who want to know ask him if such a document exists, he will probably say its confidential if he does reply

Although that would be bollocks wouldn't it, if he replied saying its confidential, how can that be as the media have said he told them Sam is Langston and a document does exist


So come on let's stop the abuse and get some actual facts put on here by Capitol Law and start emailing them and see the replies?

Stick your emails on here id love to see the truth

Straight to sticky hmmmmmmmm

wez I mean if people want facts then its only an email away, a simple email and the truth is revealed is it not unless tucker made the whole thing up who knows it cant be hidden can it nore can it be confidential

If this solicitor Chris Nott at Capitol Law has got such a document stating Sam is Langston then why don't people go find out ?

There's been so much said and abuse chucked about on here its bonkers when there's a simple solution below.

Its only a case of emailing the company as all the company employees emails and numbers are online for all to see.

Id like to see his answers to be honest as it was him who has told the media that Sam is Langston according the media story.

Email him yourself - c.nott@capitallaw.co.uk

For them who want to know ask him if such a document exists, he will probably say its confidential if he does reply

Although that would be bollocks wouldn't it, if he replied saying its confidential, how can that be as the media have said he told them Sam is Langston and a document does exist


So come on let's stop the abuse and get some actual facts put on here by Capitol Law and start emailing them and see the replies?

Stick your emails on here id love to see the truth

Straight to sticky hmmmmmmmm

wez I mean if people want facts then its only an email away, a simple email and the truth is revealed is it not unless tucker made the whole thing up who knows it cant be hidden can it nore can it be confidential

Just seems like prolonging things again ,so you think that the quotes from the landfill were made up ? Come on if it was I'm sure Sam would of been suing them

Can we not draw a line underneath this and move on? I have no axe to grind in favour or against Hamman and Tan. I only want to see our club do the best it can while being run in a sensible and viable way, that gives us a future and a legacy that our children can enjoy.

If this solicitor Chris Nott at Capitol Law has got such a document stating Sam is Langston then why don't people go find out ?

There's been so much said and abuse chucked about on here its bonkers when there's a simple solution below.

Its only a case of emailing the company as all the company employees emails and numbers are online for all to see.

Id like to see his answers to be honest as it was him who has told the media that Sam is Langston according the media story.

Email him yourself - c.nott@capitallaw.co.uk

For them who want to know ask him if such a document exists, he will probably say its confidential if he does reply

Although that would be bollocks wouldn't it, if he replied saying its confidential, how can that be as the media have said he told them Sam is Langston and a document does exist


So come on let's stop the abuse and get some actual facts put on here by Capitol Law and start emailing them and see the replies?

Stick your emails on here id love to see the truth

Straight to sticky hmmmmmmmm

wez I mean if people want facts then its only an email away, a simple email and the truth is revealed is it not unless tucker made the whole thing up who knows it cant be hidden can it nore can it be confidential

Just seems like prolonging things again ,so you think that the quotes from the landfill were made up ? Come on if it was I'm sure Sam would of been suing them

But surely if they have already paid Langston whatever the figure is up to when they stopped the payments then how comes now they know its supposed to be Sam then why pay him the rest now, it don't add up imo

Last edited by Bluebird1977 on Wed Feb 03, 2016 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Can we not draw a line underneath this and move on? I have no axe to grind in favour or against Hamman and Tan. I only want to see our club do the best it can while being run in a sensible and viable way, that gives us a future and a legacy that our children can enjoy.

This is a going on at the club as we speak that's why we have such forums for debate, it don't mean im grinding any axes and we all want the club to be run sensible. The point is the truths there if people want it rather than the 20 other threads guessing on it.

Sams a fuckin crook end of dosent take a rocket scientist to work that out.

Sams a fuckin crook end of dosent take a rocket scientist to work that out.

There all out to make money that's what owners want, tans no different it will come around again one day at some point. The point is if people want to know then email this guy or believe what's been said in the media otherwise it's just guess work.

If this solicitor Chris Nott at Capitol Law has got such a document stating Sam is Langston then why don't people go find out ?

There's been so much said and abuse chucked about on here its bonkers when there's a simple solution below.

Its only a case of emailing the company as all the company employees emails and numbers are online for all to see.

Id like to see his answers to be honest as it was him who has told the media that Sam is Langston according the media story.

Email him yourself - c.nott@capitallaw.co.uk

For them who want to know ask him if such a document exists, he will probably say its confidential if he does reply

Although that would be bollocks wouldn't it, if he replied saying its confidential, how can that be as the media have said he told them Sam is Langston and a document does exist


So come on let's stop the abuse and get some actual facts put on here by Capitol Law and start emailing them and see the replies?

Stick your emails on here id love to see the truth

Or perhaps the fully paid up Sam Hamman fan club members on here could contact him and ask for a statement directly to the fans of the club he loves so much and wouldn't hurt in a million years or 27million or however much he squeezed out of us-opps sorry I ment Langston.

Sams a fuckin crook end of dosent take a rocket scientist to work that out.

There all out to make money that's what owners want, tans no different it will come around again one day at some point. The point is if people want to know then email this guy or believe what's been said in the media otherwise it's just guess work.

Ian you coming across pissed
has someone put you upto it

Bluebird 77 is right we all give it the big one on here, it's about time they backed it up and get go do what he says and put the replies on here

So come on let's stop the abuse and get some actual facts put on here by Capitol Law and start emailing them and see the replies?

Stick your emails on here id love to see the truth

If you'd love to see the truth so much, e-mail them yourself, problem solved.

Sams a fuckin crook end of dosent take a rocket scientist to work that out.

There all out to make money that's what owners want, tans no different it will come around again one day at some point. The point is if people want to know then email this guy or believe what's been said in the media otherwise it's just guess work.

Ian you coming across pissed
has someone put you upto it

Don't drink Steve unless I'm at the football you know this.

Somebody put me up to this be fucked I say what I think people don't like it tough shit.

The amount of threads on this topic got me thinking why not find out the facts which is easy enough just from a simple email. common sence really

Bluebird 77 is dead right.

Mr Nott clearly told the press Sam Hammam is Langston. Fact.

Sam Hammam still States he's not Langston. Fact.

One is not telling the truth and lying to Cardiff City Fans.

So as the pair of them are quick enough to talk to the press knowing the word goes back to the supporters / customers of the club / Company , then surely the customers/ fans have a right to know who is lying and who is telling the truth ?

Now then, Mr Nott has stated it as fact, then that means that there can't be any confidentiality agreements in place on the settlement of the case, meaning Mr Nott can disclose and back up his statements and demonstrate facts, if he can't then it's pretty clear he's a bullshitter. On the other hand if he can demonstrate ( and he has no reason not to because clearly there is no confidentiality agreement in place because if it's good enough for the press its good enough surely for the clubs fans/ customers ) then Sam Hammam can be shown as the bullshitter !!!
One of them is bullshitting which one is it ?
If it's the lawyer / solicitor Mr Nott, then in my opinion he should resign as who would have faith in a solicitor or firm who bullshits like that ?
Same difference, if it proves to be Hammam , he should never be allowed to enter in whatever life role he has be allowed in the Stadium.
One of thems a bullshitter for sure,
Which one is it ?
Ask Nott.

Bluebird 77 is right we all give it the big one on here, it's about time they backed it up and get go do what he says and put the replies on here

That's my point. It's a simple solution I'm not a Sam or tan follower everyone knows this. I'd just like to see if such a documenta exists rather than guess and abuse. Whichever way u look at it people can find out them self rather than guess.

So come on let's stop the abuse and get some actual facts put on here by Capitol Law and start emailing them and see the replies?

Stick your emails on here id love to see the truth

If you'd love to see the truth so much, e-mail them yourself, problem solved.

I have emailed them have you?

Waiting for reply just curious as things don't add up

Bluebird 77 is dead right.

Mr Nott clearly told the press Sam Hammam is Langston. Fact.

Sam Hammam still States he's not Langston. Fact.

One is not telling the truth and lying to Cardiff City Fans.

So as the pair of them are quick enough to talk to the press knowing the word goes back to the supporters / customers of the club / Company , then surely the customers/ fans have a right to know who is lying and who is telling the truth ?

Now then, Mr Nott has stated it as fact, then that means that there can't be any confidentiality agreements in place on the settlement of the case, meaning Mr Nott can disclose and back up his statements and demonstrate facts, if he can't then it's pretty clear he's a bullshitter. On the other hand if he can demonstrate ( and he has no reason not to because clearly there is no confidentiality agreeiment in place because if it's good enough for the press its good enough surely for the clubs fans/ customers ) then Sam Hammam can be shown as the bullshitter !!!
One of them is bullshitting which one is it ?
If it's the lawyer / solicitor Mr Nott, then in my opinion he should resign as who would have faith in a solicitor or firm who bullshits like that ?
Same difference, if it proves to be Hammam , he should never be allowed to enter in whatever life role he has be allowed in the Stadium.
One of thems a bullshitter for sure,
Which one is it ?
Ask Nott.

Daya imo either tuckers story, nott or Sam's lying, one will come to fruit surely just off an email to this guy. He's got nothing to hide clearly.

I have emailed them have you?

Waiting for reply just curious as things don't add up [/quote]

No I haven't pal, not my money so couldn't really give a shit. I'm sure though if it isn't true or they've breached a confidentiality clause then Sam will be taking the club back to court. More interested in the footy than the money and politics of the club to be honest, I can't change the way they run it so I concentrate on my own life and things I can influence, makes life simpler and more enjoyable.

Bluebird 77 is dead right.

Mr Nott clearly told the press Sam Hammam is Langston. Fact.

Sam Hammam still States he's not Langston. Fact.

One is not telling the truth and lying to Cardiff City Fans.

So as the pair of them are quick enough to talk to the press knowing the word goes back to the supporters / customers of the club / Company , then surely the customers/ fans have a right to know who is lying and who is telling the truth ?

Now then, Mr Nott has stated it as fact, then that means that there can't be any confidentiality agreements in place on the settlement of the case, meaning Mr Nott can disclose and back up his statements and demonstrate facts, if he can't then it's pretty clear he's a bullshitter. On the other hand if he can demonstrate ( and he has no reason not to because clearly there is no confidentiality agreement in place because if it's good enough for the press its good enough surely for the clubs fans/ customers ) then Sam Hammam can be shown as the bullshitter !!!
One of them is bullshitting which one is it ?
If it's the lawyer / solicitor Mr Nott, then in my opinion he should resign as who would have faith in a solicitor or firm who bullshits like that ?
Same difference, if it proves to be Hammam , he should never be allowed to enter in whatever life role he has be allowed in the Stadium.
One of thems a bullshitter for sure,
Which one is it ?
Ask Nott.

Steve you said on another thread that the solicitor has had a bollocking from his bosses bfor disclosing that Sam was Langston now your saying that he should respond to email s, you can't have it both ways if it's true he had a bollocking then do you honestly think he's going to email anyone back ?

It's not hard in life to ask a question,
.....

Dear Mr Nott,

Firstly I hope you are well and your recent bout of late nights burning the midnight oil and chomping unhealthy pizza hasn't caused too many issues.

Anyway the reason I write to you this evening is in regard to your press statement that Mr Sam Hammam is Langston.

For you to be able to make this statement to the press, clearly there isn't a confidentiality agreement in place, so could you please provide to me evidence of this.

The reason I ask is because Mr Sam Hammam states this is not the case and that at no time did he inform you this.

So this means one is not being truthful to the supporters of Cardiff City.

As you have informed the press obviously based off your factual evidence may I ask you provide what ever you wish to back up your press statement, as there can't be any reason to why you can't reveal as obviously you wouldn't have made the statement to the National Welsh media.

Warm Regards

Steve Day

Pizza bit creased me

Pizza bit creased me

Well it too was part of his statement to the press. Pizza is not healthy especially late at night.

I've just watched Mr Notts video, he doesn't talk about Pizza or his love of pizza but makes many claims on behalf of Capital Law being the honest friendly law company to use who don't speak gobby do gook legal speak, but plain English as not to confuse, so hopefully Mr Nott will come back with the goods and provide the evidence to back up his statements and put everything to bed once and for and scam will be a figment of the past and can go back to hill walking with his old mucker dim but Gwyn.

It's not hard in life to ask a question,
.....

Dear Mr Nott,

Firstly I hope you are well and your recent bout of late nights burning the midnight oil and chomping unhealthy pizza hasn't caused too many issues.

Anyway the reason I write to you this evening is in regard to your press statement that Mr Sam Hammam is Langston.

For you to be able to make this statement to the press, clearly there isn't a confidentiality agreement in place, so could you please provide to me evidence of this.

The reason I ask is because Mr Sam Hammam states this is not the case and that at no time did he inform you this.

So this means one is not being truthful to the supporters of Cardiff City.

As you have informed the press obviously based off your factual evidence may I ask you provide what ever you wish to back up your press statement, as there can't be any reason to why you can't reveal as obviously you wouldn't have made the statement to the National Welsh media.

Warm Regards

Steve Day

Because he's a brief he would not dare to deliberately lie or deliberate mislead because he would never work again.It's a pity your not as vociferous with Hamman in the pursuit of truth.I would like to have seen Hamman swear under oath because then he would have the same constraints as Nott.So,to me the answer is clear.

Sneggy I'd like t see a statement from Sam to. Somebody's fell by fibs it makes no sence why Tucker has put the story out yet it's supposed to be confidential but it's goes against the meaning of the word, I'm not here to name call or abuse anyone it's just mind boggling, either way tan comes out smelling of roses which would be another game played well by the club
The plot thickens as they say

It's not hard in life to ask a question,
.....

Dear Mr Nott,

Firstly I hope you are well and your recent bout of late nights burning the midnight oil and chomping unhealthy pizza hasn't caused too many issues.

Anyway the reason I write to you this evening is in regard to your press statement that Mr Sam Hammam is Langston.

For you to be able to make this statement to the press, clearly there isn't a confidentiality agreement in place, so could you please provide to me evidence of this.

The reason I ask is because Mr Sam Hammam states this is not the case and that at no time did he inform you this.

So this means one is not being truthful to the supporters of Cardiff City.

As you have informed the press obviously based off your factual evidence may I ask you provide what ever you wish to back up your press statement, as there can't be any reason to why you can't reveal as obviously you wouldn't have made the statement to the National Welsh media.

Warm Regards

Steve Day

Because he's a brief he would not dare to deliberately lie or deliberate mislead because he would never work again.It's a pity your not as vociferous with Hamman in the pursuit of truth.I would like to have seen Hamman swear under oath because then he would have the same constraints as Nott.So,to me the answer is clear.

Sneggy, believe me I'm no Scam fan. I was the first to suss him out many years ago and fought his inner circle on many occasions, maybe someone could upload the snowden hill walking video where Scam and his cronies dim butt Gwyn , Vince not the brightest Alm, and a few other Scam hangers on throw drunken abuse at me from their mountain hut, lead by Scam. Funny enough the video has disappeared from the Valley Rams collection of videos when all he others haven't ? I wonder why ???? Shall I tell you why ! Because I was right and they were wrong !!!!
Where are they now ? Scam has gone, dim butt Gwyn has gone as well as many other so called die hard loyal supporters who wouldn't accept my stance against Scam, sticking to him as lumps of glue with some hero worship.
Black Friday - I stood there and called him out to be a lying c**t , whilst corky and dim butt Gwyn with their mug and bigger mug t-shirts soon whipped them off and went for another friendly meal down the bay, after calling him out all day earlier !!
Then there's that thick follower Ketty, hides behinds others but gutless to the core, hides behind others , like the time I was attacked after celebrating a city win in the play offs, fat Sam who has more faces than a town hall clock, Ketty no brain cell , all just sat there thinking it was amusing , dim butt Gwyn who thrived on it for years later, well guess what I was right and they were wrong !!! Scam was a wrong un, he was just after the retail park, so please don't call me a scam fan !!

Can we not draw a line underneath this and move on? I have no axe to grind in favour or against Hamman and Tan. I only want to see our club do the best it can while being run in a sensible and viable way, that gives us a future and a legacy that our children can enjoy.

Well said.

It's not hard in life to ask a question,
.....

Dear Mr Nott,

Firstly I hope you are well and your recent bout of late nights burning the midnight oil and chomping unhealthy pizza hasn't caused too many issues.

Anyway the reason I write to you this evening is in regard to your press statement that Mr Sam Hammam is Langston.

For you to be able to make this statement to the press, clearly there isn't a confidentiality agreement in place, so could you please provide to me evidence of this.

The reason I ask is because Mr Sam Hammam states this is not the case and that at no time did he inform you this.

So this means one is not being truthful to the supporters of Cardiff City.

As you have informed the press obviously based off your factual evidence may I ask you provide what ever you wish to back up your press statement, as there can't be any reason to why you can't reveal as obviously you wouldn't have made the statement to the National Welsh media.

Warm Regards

Steve Day

Because he's a brief he would not dare to deliberately lie or deliberate mislead because he would never work again.It's a pity your not as vociferous with Hamman in the pursuit of truth.I would like to have seen Hamman swear under oath because then he would have the same constraints as Nott.So,to me the answer is clear.

Sneggy, believe me I'm no Scam fan. I was the first to suss him out many years ago and fought his inner circle on many occasions, maybe someone could upload the snowden hill walking video where Scam and his cronies dim butt Gwyn , Vince not the brightest Alm, and a few other Scam hangers on throw drunken abuse at me from their mountain hut, lead by Scam. Funny enough the video has disappeared from the Valley Rams collection of videos when all he others haven't ? I wonder why ???? Shall I tell you why ! Because I was right and they were wrong !!!!
Where are they now ? Scam has gone, dim butt Gwyn has gone as well as many other so called die hard loyal supporters who wouldn't accept my stance against Scam, sticking to him as lumps of glue with some hero worship.
Black Friday - I stood there and called him out to be a lying c**t , whilst corky and dim butt Gwyn with their mug and bigger mug t-shirts soon whipped them off and went for another friendly meal down the bay, after calling him out all day earlier !!
Then there's that thick follower Ketty, hides behinds others but gutless to the core, hides behind others , like the time I was attacked after celebrating a city win in the play offs, fat Sam who has more faces than a town hall clock, Ketty no brain cell , all just sat there thinking it was amusing , dim butt Gwyn who thrived on it for years later, well guess what I was right and they were wrong !!! Scam was a wrong un, he was just after the retail park, so please don't call me a scam fan !!

Wasn't aimed at you in particular.

Had a message from someone I know who is connected to the goings on at Cardiff City and is always 100% correct I have no doubt that this is correct

"The first court hearing last week tans barrister asked that if it proceeded to the high court could they have full disclosure of who Langston were as it was never tans debt but inherited from the time Sam had run the club. The judge allowed that if they went to court there would be full disclosure.
A week later there is an amicable deal where Sam has to pay for his own court and legal costs. Why because Sam did not want disclosure in the high court.
My daughter in law worked as part of the team for capital law on the case so 100 percent Sam was Langston."

Had a message from someone I know who is connected to the goings on at Cardiff City and is always 100% correct I have no doubt that this is correct

"The first court hearing last week tans barrister asked that if it proceeded to the high court could they have full disclosure of who Langston were as it was never tans debt but inherited from the time Sam had run the club. The judge allowed that if they went to court there would be full disclosure.
A week later there is an amicable deal where Sam has to pay for his own court and legal costs. Why because Sam did not want disclosure in the high court.
My daughter in law worked as part of the team for capital law on the case so 100 percent Sam was Langston."

Hi Wezz,

Not too many have a daughter in law at capital law, so of course I know your contact !!!

So I think the best option is to see what Mr Nott has to say and comeback with, I'm sure your fed up as a Cardiff City fan of Chinese whispers.
I have to say I'm intrigued for the first time in years, only one can be telling the truth , Nott or Hammam.

Nott can obviously reveal the facts because he's already told the press in a statement made by himself, if he doesn't he's obviously a bullshitter and not a solicitor to be used in the future and in fact capital law should remove him if it's the case, who wants a lying a solicitor ?
There again , if he can back it up, let's be honest here he's told the press its fact, then Scam should never even be allowed to enter Wales let alone Cardiff !!

SH claims its bullshit, now we await the Nott response !

Had a message from someone I know who is connected to the goings on at Cardiff City and is always 100% correct I have no doubt that this is correct

"The first court hearing last week tans barrister asked that if it proceeded to the high court could they have full disclosure of who Langston were as it was never tans debt but inherited from the time Sam had run the club. The judge allowed that if they went to court there would be full disclosure.
A week later there is an amicable deal where Sam has to pay for his own court and legal costs. Why because Sam did not want disclosure in the high court.
My daughter in law worked as part of the team for capital law on the case so 100 percent Sam was Langston."

Hi Wezz,

Not too many have a daughter in law at capital law, so of course I know your contact !!!

So I think the best option is to see what Mr Nott has to say and comeback with, I'm sure your fed up as a Cardiff City fan of Chinese whispers.
I have to say I'm intrigued for the first time in years, only one can be telling the truth , Nott or Hammam.

Nott can obviously reveal the facts because he's already told the press in a statement made by himself, if he doesn't he's obviously a bullshitter and not a solicitor to be used in the future and in fact capital law should remove him if it's the case, who wants a lying a solicitor ?
There again , if he can back it up, let's be honest here he's told the press its fact, then Scam should never even be allowed to enter Wales let alone Cardiff !!

SH claims its bullshit, now we await the Nott response !

I know who I believe and it's not the hill Walker