Tue Feb 02, 2016 7:54 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 7:58 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:01 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:03 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:04 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:Thought osilaja went back out onloan ?
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:18 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:23 pm
Forever Blue wrote:FABIO? ? ?![]()
Will Kenneth Zohore feature at all in the squad ? Hmmm?
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:25 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:26 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:30 pm
djronnieb wrote:Where's Gunnerson Carlos ?
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:36 pm
Peltier playing in both positions?carlccfc wrote:' CCFC TEAM THIS SATURDAY ? '
This is the team I believe Russell Slade will pick on Saturday, not necessarily the side I would like to see or choose but going on previous selections I think this will be the line up.
Marshall
Peltier
Connolly
Manga
Malone
Whittingham
Ralls
O'Keefe
Ameobi
Lawrence
Pilkington
I believe Slade will go for his preferred right back Lee Peltier, who returns after suspension, and Malone seems to be his choice of left back.
The midfield is where I see no change from the win against Huddersfield.
With Mason sold and Lex Immers not having a fantastic game at the John Smiths Stadium, despite scoring, I sense that the manager will bring in new signing Tom Lawrence and partner Anthony Pilkington up top.
Subs :
Moore
Fabio
Dikgacoi
Immers
Saadi
I see these four of these five being certainties on the bench and the remaining two/three spaces will be very much dependant on whether or not they have recovered from injury. Saadi is the one I am doubtful about making the bench despite his tweets yesterday.
If fit then I see Morrison and Noone making the match day squad.
The centre half will be Slades biggest cause for concern if Morrison is not deemed fit to take his place, then I suspect Adedeji Oshilaja will claim a sub spot.
If Noone is not fit then Kadeem Harris may keep his place in the squad.
Will Kenneth Zohore feature at all in the squad ?
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:57 pm
Forever Blue wrote:djronnieb wrote:Where's Gunnerson Carlos ?
Yes Carlos just realised where's one if my other favourite players Gunnerson?
Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:58 pm
rontom wrote:Peltier playing in both positions?carlccfc wrote:' CCFC TEAM THIS SATURDAY ? '
This is the team I believe Russell Slade will pick on Saturday, not necessarily the side I would like to see or choose but going on previous selections I think this will be the line up.
Marshall
Peltier
Connolly
Manga
Malone
Whittingham
Ralls
O'Keefe
Ameobi
Lawrence
Pilkington
I believe Slade will go for his preferred right back Lee Peltier, who returns after suspension, and Malone seems to be his choice of left back.
The midfield is where I see no change from the win against Huddersfield.
With Mason sold and Lex Immers not having a fantastic game at the John Smiths Stadium, despite scoring, I sense that the manager will bring in new signing Tom Lawrence and partner Anthony Pilkington up top.
Subs :
Moore
Fabio
Dikgacoi
Immers
Saadi
I see these four of these five being certainties on the bench and the remaining two/three spaces will be very much dependant on whether or not they have recovered from injury. Saadi is the one I am doubtful about making the bench despite his tweets yesterday.
If fit then I see Morrison and Noone making the match day squad.
The centre half will be Slades biggest cause for concern if Morrison is not deemed fit to take his place, then I suspect Adedeji Oshilaja will claim a sub spot.
If Noone is not fit then Kadeem Harris may keep his place in the squad.
Will Kenneth Zohore feature at all in the squad ?
Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:50 pm
carlccfc wrote:Forever Blue wrote:djronnieb wrote:Where's Gunnerson Carlos ?
Yes Carlos just realised where's one if my other favourite players Gunnerson?
If Noone is not fit then perhaps he will get a place on the bench Annis
Tue Feb 02, 2016 11:03 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 11:17 pm
Wed Feb 03, 2016 12:45 am
Wed Feb 03, 2016 1:22 am
Wed Feb 03, 2016 7:34 am
worcester_ccfc wrote:I think your starting 11 will be the one that is picked Carl.
Personally I'd have the bench as Moore, Fabio, Gunnarsson, Noone, Lawrence, Macheda, Zohore.
Not sure what Slade will go for on the bench but, as someone who has criticised him all season for not having any squad depth, it is good to see us debating about who will and who won't be in the match day squad
Wed Feb 03, 2016 2:43 pm
Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:06 pm
angelis1949 wrote:I know the great adage of never changing a winning side and Slade being the cautious manager that he is will probley select the same side, but I would be tempted to try something outrageous, like having two natural strikers leading the attack,I'm not advocating leaving out the present incumbents from the side,they could be relocated to their natural playing positions, another outrageous suggesting perhaps for Slade to consider
Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:27 pm
nubbsy wrote:angelis1949 wrote:I know the great adage of never changing a winning side and Slade being the cautious manager that he is will probley select the same side, but I would be tempted to try something outrageous, like having two natural strikers leading the attack,I'm not advocating leaving out the present incumbents from the side,they could be relocated to their natural playing positions, another outrageous suggesting perhaps for Slade to consider
We're you not one of the ones crying out for 4-5-1? Now your complaining that were playing with a no.10?
Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:41 pm
angelis1949 wrote:nubbsy wrote:angelis1949 wrote:I know the great adage of never changing a winning side and Slade being the cautious manager that he is will probley select the same side, but I would be tempted to try something outrageous, like having two natural strikers leading the attack,I'm not advocating leaving out the present incumbents from the side,they could be relocated to their natural playing positions, another outrageous suggesting perhaps for Slade to consider
We're you not one of the ones crying out for 4-5-1? Now your complaining that were playing with a no.10?
No I wasn't actually, would help if you get you're facts correct
Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:47 pm
nubbsy wrote:angelis1949 wrote:nubbsy wrote:angelis1949 wrote:I know the great adage of never changing a winning side and Slade being the cautious manager that he is will probley select the same side, but I would be tempted to try something outrageous, like having two natural strikers leading the attack,I'm not advocating leaving out the present incumbents from the side,they could be relocated to their natural playing positions, another outrageous suggesting perhaps for Slade to consider
We're you not one of the ones crying out for 4-5-1? Now your complaining that were playing with a no.10?
No I wasn't actually, would help if you get you're facts correct
You'd complain regardless of what slade done or achieved though, your allergic to positivity!
Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:36 pm
2014ccfc28 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:I think your starting 11 will be the one that is picked Carl.
Personally I'd have the bench as Moore, Fabio, Gunnarsson, Noone, Lawrence, Macheda, Zohore.
Not sure what Slade will go for on the bench but, as someone who has criticised him all season for not having any squad depth, it is good to see us debating about who will and who won't be in the match day squad
Wow!!! That's a attack minded bench no wonder we leak goals if people think like Worcester. Shocking.
Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:44 pm
angelis1949 wrote:nubbsy wrote:angelis1949 wrote:I know the great adage of never changing a winning side and Slade being the cautious manager that he is will probley select the same side, but I would be tempted to try something outrageous, like having two natural strikers leading the attack,I'm not advocating leaving out the present incumbents from the side,they could be relocated to their natural playing positions, another outrageous suggesting perhaps for Slade to consider
We're you not one of the ones crying out for 4-5-1? Now your complaining that were playing with a no.10?
No I wasn't actually, would help if you get you're facts correct
Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:09 pm
ealing_ayatollah wrote:angelis1949 wrote:nubbsy wrote:angelis1949 wrote:I know the great adage of never changing a winning side and Slade being the cautious manager that he is will probley select the same side, but I would be tempted to try something outrageous, like having two natural strikers leading the attack,I'm not advocating leaving out the present incumbents from the side,they could be relocated to their natural playing positions, another outrageous suggesting perhaps for Slade to consider
We're you not one of the ones crying out for 4-5-1? Now your complaining that were playing with a no.10?
No I wasn't actually, would help if you get you're facts correct
Ah now Angelis you can't blame him for not keeping track on what you've moaned about in the past.
There is so much that upsets you about CCFC it's just easier to assume you've complained about any given topic at some point and in doing so accept that 9 out of 10 times that'll be correct.
Its far more efficient to play the law of averages like this than go trawling back through all your posts which would not only be time consuming but also make for pretty bleak reading.
Thu Feb 04, 2016 7:58 am
angelis1949 wrote:ealing_ayatollah wrote:angelis1949 wrote:nubbsy wrote:angelis1949 wrote:I know the great adage of never changing a winning side and Slade being the cautious manager that he is will probley select the same side, but I would be tempted to try something outrageous, like having two natural strikers leading the attack,I'm not advocating leaving out the present incumbents from the side,they could be relocated to their natural playing positions, another outrageous suggesting perhaps for Slade to consider
We're you not one of the ones crying out for 4-5-1? Now your complaining that were playing with a no.10?
No I wasn't actually, would help if you get you're facts correct
Ah now Angelis you can't blame him for not keeping track on what you've moaned about in the past.
There is so much that upsets you about CCFC it's just easier to assume you've complained about any given topic at some point and in doing so accept that 9 out of 10 times that'll be correct.
Its far more efficient to play the law of averages like this than go trawling back through all your posts which would not only be time consuming but also make for pretty bleak reading.
Stupid boy
Thu Feb 04, 2016 6:00 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:angelis1949 wrote:ealing_ayatollah wrote:angelis1949 wrote:nubbsy wrote:angelis1949 wrote:I know the great adage of never changing a winning side and Slade being the cautious manager that he is will probley select the same side, but I would be tempted to try something outrageous, like having two natural strikers leading the attack,I'm not advocating leaving out the present incumbents from the side,they could be relocated to their natural playing positions, another outrageous suggesting perhaps for Slade to consider
We're you not one of the ones crying out for 4-5-1? Now your complaining that were playing with a no.10?
No I wasn't actually, would help if you get you're facts correct
Ah now Angelis you can't blame him for not keeping track on what you've moaned about in the past.
There is so much that upsets you about CCFC it's just easier to assume you've complained about any given topic at some point and in doing so accept that 9 out of 10 times that'll be correct.
Its far more efficient to play the law of averages like this than go trawling back through all your posts which would not only be time consuming but also make for pretty bleak reading.
Stupid boy
Far from stupid ealing, an astute and subtle post that exposes the miserable, negative poster that this old man is.
The funny thing is you're only stating what the vast majority of fans already know.