Tue Feb 02, 2016 3:42 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 3:54 pm
Daya wrote:The so called professional solicitor Mr Nott according to my impeccable source was having a right roasting last night over his press statement. Apparently in the so called confidential notes on file Hammam made admission to being apart of langston.
Confidential business that Nott un professionally informed the press.
So there we are we finally find out ..... There was confidential notes stating or an admission but Club and lawyers didn't keep confidential.
Maybe there was too many " E" s in the pizzas that made Nott go off his head.
Sam Hammam as I always stated when the club was still at ninian park was after one thing, the retail park of course in his partnership with Ronnie boy who was doing the same at Brentford.
The council wasn't having it as we all know.
Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:03 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Daya wrote:The so called professional solicitor Mr Nott according to my impeccable source was having a right roasting last night over his press statement. Apparently in the so called confidential notes on file Hammam made admission to being apart of langston.
Confidential business that Nott un professionally informed the press.
So there we are we finally find out ..... There was confidential notes stating or an admission but Club and lawyers didn't keep confidential.
Maybe there was too many " E" s in the pizzas that made Nott go off his head.
Sam Hammam as I always stated when the club was still at ninian park was after one thing, the retail park of course in his partnership with Ronnie boy who was doing the same at Brentford.
The council wasn't having it as we all know.
is this an apology for your embarrassing defense of scam hammam yesterday?
Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:05 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:13 pm
Daya wrote:you must be f*cking thick as i've never defended Sam Hammam. Not for donkeys years around 2002/3.
You need to engage a brain and read through my posts which started with where was the confirmation of Hammam being involved with Langston. We got to the answer eventually Mr Nott and his so called confidential files.
Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:17 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Daya wrote:you must be f*cking thick as i've never defended Sam Hammam. Not for donkeys years around 2002/3.
You need to engage a brain and read through my posts which started with where was the confirmation of Hammam being involved with Langston. We got to the answer eventually Mr Nott and his so called confidential files.
all i read is that you are a know-it-all tw*t who got it very wrong
Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:20 pm
Daya wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Daya wrote:you must be f*cking thick as i've never defended Sam Hammam. Not for donkeys years around 2002/3.
You need to engage a brain and read through my posts which started with where was the confirmation of Hammam being involved with Langston. We got to the answer eventually Mr Nott and his so called confidential files.
all i read is that you are a know-it-all tw*t who got it very wrong
Got it exactly correct actually, your just too thick to note - now f**k off dumbo im trying to watch a place in the sun.
Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:33 pm
Daya wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Daya wrote:you must be f*cking thick as i've never defended Sam Hammam. Not for donkeys years around 2002/3.
You need to engage a brain and read through my posts which started with where was the confirmation of Hammam being involved with Langston. We got to the answer eventually Mr Nott and his so called confidential files.
all i read is that you are a know-it-all tw*t who got it very wrong
Got it exactly correct actually, your just too thick to note - now f**k off dumbo im trying to watch a place in the sun.
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:14 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:35 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:37 pm
A block wrote:If it was "confidential" surely he would be in the shit? Liable for legal action?
All the Sam lovers and defenders have been VERY quiet on this particular topic.
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:38 pm
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:38 pm
wez1927 wrote:A block wrote:If it was "confidential" surely he would be in the shit? Liable for legal action?
All the Sam lovers and defenders have been VERY quiet on this particular topic.
Sam's had his money. The cat is out of the bag
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:42 pm
A block wrote:wez1927 wrote:A block wrote:If it was "confidential" surely he would be in the shit? Liable for legal action?
All the Sam lovers and defenders have been VERY quiet on this particular topic.
Sam's had his money. The cat is out of the bag
Being the leach that he is, I'm sure he would jump at the chance to make some more.
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:47 pm
wez1927 wrote:Daya wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Daya wrote:you must be f*cking thick as i've never defended Sam Hammam. Not for donkeys years around 2002/3.
You need to engage a brain and read through my posts which started with where was the confirmation of Hammam being involved with Langston. We got to the answer eventually Mr Nott and his so called confidential files.
all i read is that you are a know-it-all tw*t who got it very wrong
Got it exactly correct actually, your just too thick to note - now f**k off dumbo im trying to watch a place in the sun.
Sam will begin there soon with his swag bag
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:55 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Daya wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Daya wrote:you must be f*cking thick as i've never defended Sam Hammam. Not for donkeys years around 2002/3.
You need to engage a brain and read through my posts which started with where was the confirmation of Hammam being involved with Langston. We got to the answer eventually Mr Nott and his so called confidential files.
all i read is that you are a know-it-all tw*t who got it very wrong
Got it exactly correct actually, your just too thick to note - now f**k off dumbo im trying to watch a place in the sun.
Sam will begin there soon with his swag bag
I was told a few took swagbags when the rebrand come about wez to push the red
Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:57 pm
wez1927 wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Daya wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Daya wrote:you must be f*cking thick as i've never defended Sam Hammam. Not for donkeys years around 2002/3.
You need to engage a brain and read through my posts which started with where was the confirmation of Hammam being involved with Langston. We got to the answer eventually Mr Nott and his so called confidential files.
all i read is that you are a know-it-all tw*t who got it very wrong
Got it exactly correct actually, your just too thick to note - now f**k off dumbo im trying to watch a place in the sun.
Sam will begin there soon with his swag bag
I was told a few took swagbags when the rebrand come about wez to push the red
Heard Sam gave a couple of houses out
Tue Feb 02, 2016 10:38 pm
Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:28 pm
New Order wrote:So Sam is part of Langston...all very quiet
Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:54 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:A block wrote:wez1927 wrote:A block wrote:If it was "confidential" surely he would be in the shit? Liable for legal action?
All the Sam lovers and defenders have been VERY quiet on this particular topic.
Sam's had his money. The cat is out of the bag
Being the leach that he is, I'm sure he would jump at the chance to make some more.
Why do we let this tosser daya post so much utter garbage
He disappears for months
Then jumps back on here with utter trash name calling other posters ,takes over threads with his bullying ways
Get rid of the pest I say
Wed Feb 03, 2016 5:15 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:A block wrote:wez1927 wrote:A block wrote:If it was "confidential" surely he would be in the shit? Liable for legal action?
All the Sam lovers and defenders have been VERY quiet on this particular topic.
Sam's had his money. The cat is out of the bag
Being the leach that he is, I'm sure he would jump at the chance to make some more.
Why do we let this tosser daya post so much utter garbage
He disappears for months
Then jumps back on here with utter trash name calling other posters ,takes over threads with his bullying ways
Get rid of the pest I say
Spot on.
Most of his posts are snidey and looking for a wind-up and reaction from true City fans.
Complete moron.
Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:01 pm
Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:05 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:Sadly hes back again with the same old drivel