Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:38 am
Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:42 am
Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:44 am
Steve Zodiak wrote:Said all along that as long as we are playing Championship football next season and have made big reductions in running costs and debt, Slade will have done exactly what Tan required. I don't believe for one minute that there was any serious thought of promotion this season, and that is why so many of us predicted a mid table finish before a ball was kicked.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:46 am
Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:07 am
Steve Zodiak wrote:Said all along that as long as we are playing Championship football next season and have made big reductions in running costs and debt, Slade will have done exactly what Tan required. I don't believe for one minute that there was any serious thought of promotion this season, and that is why so many of us predicted a mid table finish before a ball was kicked.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:47 am
Bob Bank Bluebird wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:Said all along that as long as we are playing Championship football next season and have made big reductions in running costs and debt, Slade will have done exactly what Tan required. I don't believe for one minute that there was any serious thought of promotion this season, and that is why so many of us predicted a mid table finish before a ball was kicked.
I completely agree but I guess I just don't want to believe that with the squad we have, the plan at the beginning of the season was purely to secure Championship football. It's depressing how negative it all is from top to bottom.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:52 am
Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:01 pm
blue lagoon wrote:Cracking deal. Ill drive Mason to Wolves
Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:29 pm
buckleys brewery wrote:We will need money to pay Langston off.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:35 pm
Bob Bank Bluebird wrote:Just want to state my concerns of lack of ambition. What are we playing at? In my eyes, although we haven't had the greatest of seasons, it has been a fairly poor championship. Sitting 5 points outside play-offs with some decent fixtures coming up, I think we still have a genuine shot at promotion.
So if this is the case, why are looking at shipping out all our strikers during an embargo? Unless there's a dead cert opportunity to bring in better replacements on loan, It seems to me that we're settling for another mediocre ending to the season and worrying more about cutting wage bills (like the Jones to Bournemouth deal last season).
With Mason and Revell looking to go (Although I agree £3mil for Mason is a great deal for us), that would leave us with only Macheda (not good enough imo) and Saadi (looks promising but not match fit atm) as out and out strikers. Although Pilks looked quality against Rotherham, we cant solely depend on him to play every game, especially in an unfamiliar position.
I'm interested on peoples thoughts on this?
Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:37 pm
Forever Blue wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:We will need money to pay Langston off.
Tan knew about that debt 5 yrs ago and agreed to pay it
Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:57 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 1:13 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 1:24 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 1:56 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 1:59 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 2:06 pm
Blueboys1927 wrote:We are back to what we have always been, a very average mid sized championship team. That's pretty good for the size of our City, I don't see why people can't except this. We could be back in League one ala Sheff Utd
Wed Jan 27, 2016 3:01 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 3:03 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 3:10 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 3:11 pm
buckleys brewery wrote:Forever Blue wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:We will need money to pay Langston off.
Tan knew about that debt 5 yrs ago and agreed to pay it
Because we ca'nt buy players with this money, the club may as well put it towards the debts. The judge might insist on this anyway.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:27 pm
Danny Says wrote:There is no chance of promotion whatsoever.
They have flirted with the top 6 but never really put a run together, and they won't.
Mid table is where this club will finish, as most predicted pre season.
What is galling is that this championship is as average as any in recent history. Some ambition, and better management of the finances and the football squad would have stood a much better chance of top 2, let alone top 6. A real wasted opportunity.
What Tan has in mind for next season is anybody's guess.
This is what we fans need to know, and should know.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 5:59 pm
but it's his money Annis he's the owner ,just like any other business owner like you or me you investment at first then claw the money back over time then hopefully have a successful business to run or sell as an assetForever Blue wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:Forever Blue wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:We will need money to pay Langston off.
Tan knew about that debt 5 yrs ago and agreed to pay it
Because we ca'nt buy players with this money, the club may as well put it towards the debts. The judge might insist on this anyway.
The money will be going back to Tan and clearing the debts he created at our club.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:54 pm
wez1927 wrote:but it's his money Annis he's the owner ,just like any other business owner like you or me you investment at first then claw the money back over time then hopefully have a successful business to run or sell as an assetForever Blue wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:Forever Blue wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:We will need money to pay Langston off.
Tan knew about that debt 5 yrs ago and agreed to pay it
Because we ca'nt buy players with this money, the club may as well put it towards the debts. The judge might insist on this anyway.
The money will be going back to Tan and clearing the debts he created at our club.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:23 pm
pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:but it's his money Annis he's the owner ,just like any other business owner like you or me you investment at first then claw the money back over time then hopefully have a successful business to run or sell as an assetForever Blue wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:Forever Blue wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:We will need money to pay Langston off.
Tan knew about that debt 5 yrs ago and agreed to pay it
Because we ca'nt buy players with this money, the club may as well put it towards the debts. The judge might insist on this anyway.
The money will be going back to Tan and clearing the debts he created at our club.
no all his is debt is it though? like way its perseaved that all city's debt is because of tan when others involved prior to tan!![]()
and at end of the day the debt is what all football clubs aquire whatever level you play at , it's just some waste more money than others ?