Pen or no pen on Pilks in the second half??

Deffo pen for me... I was in Canton and he was definitely impeded. He could have gone down earlier but stayed on his feet. For me though, he made too much of the foul, and overreacted in falling to the ground. It does not mean however that he wasn't fouled, but the theatrics didn't help his cause.

Looked a pen in 108 of the canton

It looked a definite penalty from my angle in the Grandstand too. There was a definite noise when their player made contact with Pilkington. I have no doubts their player caught Pilkington and it looked a cast iron penalty.

That's both games against Rotherham this season where we've been cheated by the officials with horrendous decisions, cheating Rotherham players and sending offs.

Deffo pen for me... I was in Canton and he was definitely impeded. He could have gone down earlier but stayed on his feet. For me though, he made too much of the foul, and overreacted in falling to the ground. It does not mean however that he wasn't fouled, but the theatrics didn't help his cause.

Not much contact, if any. He would have done better if, instead of cheating, he had looked as if he made some effort to stand up rather than deliberately flop like a mortally wounded infantryman. It may be that, at last, refs are wishing up to these sot of theatrics. Just a shame that the same didn't apply to Peltier's challenge for the sending off - complete joke, and their player should be banned for five years.

100% a pen and I was all the way up in DD canton, he made contact with pilkington but I think Pilks made it abit to dramatic which may of made the ref wave it off

Pilkington made the most of it going down but the player did foul him

A very weak foul however stoped pilks getting to the ball outside the box it's a free kick