Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:29 pm
Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:33 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Do u think he is finally learning?
Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:37 pm
angelis1949 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Do u think he is finally learning?
Maybe in away games but will return to type for home games
Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:41 pm
Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:54 pm
eddiep wrote:How can he play 4 4 2 with only 1 striker?
We only have mason in our first team squad.
Revell and the Mach are awful and only 1 on bench is enough as they are a waste when we have better midfielders than attackers
If Slade reverts he should be shot (or at least maimed)!
Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:57 pm
Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:58 pm
Pontypool_Bluebird wrote:Pilkington was upfront today with mason so it was pretty much a 4-4-2. Pilkington was fantastic today
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:25 pm
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:27 pm
BlueSince1908 wrote:I believe in changing formation depending on what team you play, if we played the same formation at home against a lowly Rotherham then you'd be expecting the same result in different circumstances.
Game by game tactics are the way forward
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:27 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Pontypool_Bluebird wrote:Pilkington was upfront today with mason so it was pretty much a 4-4-2. Pilkington was fantastic today
It was a 4411.
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:28 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Do u think he is finally learning?
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:28 pm
Pontypool_Bluebird wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Pontypool_Bluebird wrote:Pilkington was upfront today with mason so it was pretty much a 4-4-2. Pilkington was fantastic today
It was a 4411.
Lol sort of. Mason did drop a bit at times but the pair of them were up top for most of it. Great performance anyhow
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:31 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:BlueSince1908 wrote:I believe in changing formation depending on what team you play, if we played the same formation at home against a lowly Rotherham then you'd be expecting the same result in different circumstances.
Game by game tactics are the way forward
Never change a winning side.
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:32 pm
BlueSince1908 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:BlueSince1908 wrote:I believe in changing formation depending on what team you play, if we played the same formation at home against a lowly Rotherham then you'd be expecting the same result in different circumstances.
Game by game tactics are the way forward
Never change a winning side.
Not exactly a winning side considering our recent form.
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:33 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:BlueSince1908 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:BlueSince1908 wrote:I believe in changing formation depending on what team you play, if we played the same formation at home against a lowly Rotherham then you'd be expecting the same result in different circumstances.
Game by game tactics are the way forward
Never change a winning side.
Not exactly a winning side considering our recent form.
Its a winning side after this game keep it the same.
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:34 pm
BlueSince1908 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:BlueSince1908 wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:BlueSince1908 wrote:I believe in changing formation depending on what team you play, if we played the same formation at home against a lowly Rotherham then you'd be expecting the same result in different circumstances.
Game by game tactics are the way forward
Never change a winning side.
Not exactly a winning side considering our recent form.
Its a winning side after this game keep it the same.
Papering over the cracks
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:37 pm
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:40 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Christ you chnage your mind every game lol.
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:42 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Christ you chnage your mind every game lol.
I haven't changed my mind it will take more than that to turn me around but I'm just saying is Slade finally learning that 442 is not good enough?
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:44 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Christ you chnage your mind every game lol.
I haven't changed my mind it will take more than that to turn me around but I'm just saying is Slade finally learning that 442 is not good enough?
He won't learn.
He will keep with this until we lose the change back to the standard, its what he always does.
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:51 pm
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:52 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Nothing wrong with 442 at the right time, it has its uses.
But slades predictability makes us easy targets. Thankfully we have plahefs bought by previous managers to keep us going.
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:53 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Christ you chnage your mind every game lol.
I haven't changed my mind it will take more than that to turn me around but I'm just saying is Slade finally learning that 442 is not good enough?
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:55 pm
Steve Zodiak wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Christ you chnage your mind every game lol.
I haven't changed my mind it will take more than that to turn me around but I'm just saying is Slade finally learning that 442 is not good enough?
If he is he's a slow learner. Most fans have been wanting this formation for the last 27 games.
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:58 pm
Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:58 pm
2blue2handle wrote:A manager should be looking at the situation throughout a game not every half a season