' Nathan Blakeys Wrong on Ambition '

Blakeys got it wrong on his comments re ambition

Ambition is not only a short term thing

it can also be a long term thing

Surely sorting out our financial mess in the short term is ambitious

Surely having a longer term plan on the playing side is showing ambition

So putting them together is in fact showing ambition
letting jones go now is no more less ambitions then ambitious
in fact in the short term its beneficial to our financial ambitions
there for its ambitious

NATHAN BLAKE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167109

spot on

Well said.

Blakey in full of shit article shocker.

Agree Steve.

wonder how many of our fans would except a 2/3 year plan to put our club on a solid platform finance/playing footing

wonder how many of our fans would except a 2/3 year plan to put our club on a solid platform finance/playing footing

Very few. They would just say that Tan was lacking ambition.

Blakeys got it wrong on his comments re ambition

Ambition is not only a short term thing

it can also be a long term thing

Surely sorting out our financial mess in the short term is ambitious

Surely having a longer term plan on the playing side is showing ambition

So putting them together is in fact showing ambition
letting jones go now is no more less ambitions then ambitious
in fact in the short term its beneficial to our financial ambitions
there for its ambitious

NATHAN BLAKE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167109

I do like this post, however, it does not factor in the above strategies are now in place because Tan made a right pigs ear of running a football club.

He is a billionaire owner and never tried to get a top manager to run club affairs. No point crying when giving untested managers serious cash to spend in transfer windows

Blakeys got it wrong on his comments re ambition

Ambition is not only a short term thing

it can also be a long term thing

Surely sorting out our financial mess in the short term is ambitious

Surely having a longer term plan on the playing side is showing ambition

So putting them together is in fact showing ambition
letting jones go now is no more less ambitions then ambitious
in fact in the short term its beneficial to our financial ambitions
there for its ambitious

NATHAN BLAKE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167109

I do like this post, however, it does not factor in the above strategies are now in place because Tan made a right pigs ear of running a football club.

He is a billionaire owner and never tried to get a top manager to run club affairs. No point crying when giving untested managers serious cash to spend in transfer windows

I take it you mean malky and ole as he's given slade fu.. All to spend

Most of Nathan Blakes articles are a crock of shit

Blakeys got it wrong on his comments re ambition

Ambition is not only a short term thing

it can also be a long term thing

Surely sorting out our financial mess in the short term is ambitious

Surely having a longer term plan on the playing side is showing ambition

So putting them together is in fact showing ambition
letting jones go now is no more less ambitions then ambitious
in fact in the short term its beneficial to our financial ambitions
there for its ambitious

NATHAN BLAKE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167109

I do like this post, however, it does not factor in the above strategies are now in place because Tan made a right pigs ear of running a football club.

He is a billionaire owner and never tried to get a top manager to run club affairs. No point crying when giving untested managers serious cash to spend in transfer windows

How dare you? Malky not a top manager? Malky was God.

Blakeys got it wrong on his comments re ambition

Ambition is not only a short term thing

it can also be a long term thing

Surely sorting out our financial mess in the short term is ambitious

Surely having a longer term plan on the playing side is showing ambition

So putting them together is in fact showing ambition
letting jones go now is no more less ambitions then ambitious
in fact in the short term its beneficial to our financial ambitions
there for its ambitious

NATHAN BLAKE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167109

I do like this post, however, it does not factor in the above strategies are now in place because Tan made a right pigs ear of running a football club.

He is a billionaire owner and never tried to get a top manager to run club affairs. No point crying when giving untested managers serious cash to spend in transfer windows

How dare you? Malky not a top manager? Malky was God.

Lol, easy for me to say in hindsight, but, I would like to think it was my money, I'd give serious thoughts (+ sleepless nights) who I've employed to spend it!

Blakeys got it wrong on his comments re ambition

Ambition is not only a short term thing

it can also be a long term thing

Surely sorting out our financial mess in the short term is ambitious

Surely having a longer term plan on the playing side is showing ambition

So putting them together is in fact showing ambition
letting jones go now is no more less ambitions then ambitious
in fact in the short term its beneficial to our financial ambitions
there for its ambitious

NATHAN BLAKE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167109

I do like this post, however, it does not factor in the above strategies are now in place because Tan made a right pigs ear of running a football club.

He is a billionaire owner and never tried to get a top manager to run club affairs. No point crying when giving untested managers serious cash to spend in transfer windows

I take it you mean malky and ole as he's given slade fu.. All to spend

That's my point, I can't applaud the cost cutting as I personally thought a billionaire owner was going to be a benefactor, not a venture capitalist

Blakeys got it wrong on his comments re ambition

Ambition is not only a short term thing

it can also be a long term thing

Surely sorting out our financial mess in the short term is ambitious

Surely having a longer term plan on the playing side is showing ambition

So putting them together is in fact showing ambition
letting jones go now is no more less ambitions then ambitious
in fact in the short term its beneficial to our financial ambitions
there for its ambitious

NATHAN BLAKE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167109

I do like this post, however, it does not factor in the above strategies are now in place because Tan made a right pigs ear of running a football club.

He is a billionaire owner and never tried to get a top manager to run club affairs. No point crying when giving untested managers serious cash to spend in transfer windows

How dare you? Malky not a top manager? Malky was God.

Lol, easy for me to say in hindsight, but, I would like to think it was my money, I'd give serious thoughts (+ sleepless nights) who I've employed to spend it!

Completely agree with you.

Blakeys got it wrong on his comments re ambition

Ambition is not only a short term thing

it can also be a long term thing

Surely sorting out our financial mess in the short term is ambitious

Surely having a longer term plan on the playing side is showing ambition

So putting them together is in fact showing ambition
letting jones go now is no more less ambitions then ambitious
in fact in the short term its beneficial to our financial ambitions
there for its ambitious

NATHAN BLAKE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=167109

I do like this post, however, it does not factor in the above strategies are now in place because Tan made a right pigs ear of running a football club.

He is a billionaire owner and never tried to get a top manager to run club affairs. No point crying when giving untested managers serious cash to spend in transfer windows

I take it you mean malky and ole as he's given slade fu.. All to spend

That's my point, I can't applaud the cost cutting as I personally thought a billionaire owner was going to be a benefactor, not a venture capitalist

He would have been. Then we started abusing him personally and racially and he changed his mind.

wonder how many of our fans would except a 2/3 year plan to put our club on a solid platform finance/playing footing

Very few. They would just say that Tan was lacking ambition.

Yep and they then say in another thread the debt needs to go down tan needs to go and so does slade, this one always cracks me up

wonder how many of our fans would except a 2/3 year plan to put our club on a solid platform finance/playing footing

Very few. They would just say that Tan was lacking ambition.

Yep and they then say in another thread the debt needs to go down tan needs to go and so does slade, this one always cracks me up

The debt does need to go down but we need expensive players else we have no ambition. Oh hang on.

KJ is overpaid but to let him go is a lack of ambition. Oh hang on.

wonder how many of our fans would except a 2/3 year plan to put our club on a solid platform finance/playing footing

Very few. They would just say that Tan was lacking ambition.

Yep and they then say in another thread the debt needs to go down tan needs to go and so does slade, this one always cracks me up

The debt does need to go down but we need expensive players else we have no ambition. Oh hang on.

KJ is overpaid but to let him go is a lack of ambition. Oh hang on.

You couldn't make it up rite