Tan playing another blinder

Promising Millions to Slade if we are in the Playoffs come January Just like my very good mate who told a jack he would get a Swansea tattoo if we go up No the thinking of my mate and Mr Vincent Tan : In Slade we trust

And ill give everyone £100000 if Aston villa win the premiership this season and man city get relegated at same time

And ill give everyone £100000 if Aston villa win the premiership this season and man city get relegated at same time

Hmmmm

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

And ill give everyone £100000 if Aston villa win the premiership this season and man city get relegated at same time

Bet your house on it!

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Then he let him. If you give someone money and trust them to make good decisions, then you let them have free reign over how its spent.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Then he let him. If you give someone money and trust them to make good decisions, then you let them have free reign over how its spent.

But nukes said let him spend it on an 8 million cart horse. He didn't. That was the main reason he decided to sack him.

Customers with no voice we are.

Tan can easy replace us remember? ....................Where are the new customers? Where is Tan?

Tan out

Promising Millions to Slade if we are in the Playoffs come January Just like my very good mate who told a jack he would get a Swansea tattoo if we go up No the thinking of my mate and Mr Vincent Tan : In Slade we trust

What kind of T.Watt would say they'd get a jack tattoo.

Promising Millions to Slade if we are in the Playoffs come January Just like my very good mate who told a jack he would get a Swansea tattoo if we go up No the thinking of my mate and Mr Vincent Tan : In Slade we trust

What kind of T.Watt would say they'd get a jack tattoo.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Then he let him. If you give someone money and trust them to make good decisions, then you let them have free reign over how its spent.

But nukes said let him spend it on an 8 million cart horse. He didn't. That was the main reason he decided to sack him.

Nukes didn't say anything

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Oh so now you admit tan set the budget. So malky didn't overspend, tan did? Bit of a backtrack here.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Oh so now you admit tan set the budget. So malky didn't overspend, tan did? Bit of a backtrack here.

Well there is debate over that as apparently it was 35 million and 50 million was spent. My point is that Tan or anyone for that matter didn't expect Malky to spend 8.5 million on 'one for the future'.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Oh so now you admit tan set the budget. So malky didn't overspend, tan did? Bit of a backtrack here.

Well there is debate over that as apparently it was 35 million and 50 million was spent. My point is that Tan or anyone for that matter didn't expect Malky to spend 8.5 million on 'one for the future'.

But the question remains. If they didn't want to spend the level of money they did on the players they did then why did they sign the contacts involved?

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Oh so now you admit tan set the budget. So malky didn't overspend, tan did? Bit of a backtrack here.

Well there is debate over that as apparently it was 35 million and 50 million was spent. My point is that Tan or anyone for that matter didn't expect Malky to spend 8.5 million on 'one for the future'.

But the question remains. If they didn't want to spend the level of money they did on the players they did then why did they sign the contacts involved?

I read an article that said Moody could sign off on contracts. Not sure if that's right.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Oh so now you admit tan set the budget. So malky didn't overspend, tan did? Bit of a backtrack here.

Well there is debate over that as apparently it was 35 million and 50 million was spent. My point is that Tan or anyone for that matter didn't expect Malky to spend 8.5 million on 'one for the future'.

But the question remains. If they didn't want to spend the level of money they did on the players they did then why did they sign the contacts involved?

I read an article that said Moody could sign off on contracts. Not sure if that's right.

All big contracts had to be ( as they are now) signed off at CEO/ director level. Plus Moody was never a signatory on the bank account to authorise the payments.

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Oh so now you admit tan set the budget. So malky didn't overspend, tan did? Bit of a backtrack here.

Well there is debate over that as apparently it was 35 million and 50 million was spent. My point is that Tan or anyone for that matter didn't expect Malky to spend 8.5 million on 'one for the future'.

But tan or his CO still signed the cheques. They still take responsibility for the cash spent. Malkys fault for buying a dud that's fair enough but you have to admit the board hold huge responsiblity due to their complete lack of football knowledge

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Oh so now you admit tan set the budget. So malky didn't overspend, tan did? Bit of a backtrack here.

Well there is debate over that as apparently it was 35 million and 50 million was spent. My point is that Tan or anyone for that matter didn't expect Malky to spend 8.5 million on 'one for the future'.

But the question remains. If they didn't want to spend the level of money they did on the players they did then why did they sign the contacts involved?

I read an article that said Moody could sign off on contracts. Not sure if that's right.

All big contracts had to be ( as they are now) signed off at CEO/ director level. Plus Moody was never a signatory on the bank account to authorise the payments.

Maccydee is a huge tan apologist and ignores facts. He's ranger blame moody than face the truth that Tan fucked up spending 50m and blamed the whole thing on Malky n moody

I wouldn't be surprised. This is the same owner that allowed Malky to spend £8m+ on a Danish carthorse.

He didn't let him. He gave a budget to Malky and Moody and trusted them to spend it wisely. They wasted it.

Oh so now you admit tan set the budget. So malky didn't overspend, tan did? Bit of a backtrack here.

Well there is debate over that as apparently it was 35 million and 50 million was spent. My point is that Tan or anyone for that matter didn't expect Malky to spend 8.5 million on 'one for the future'.

But the question remains. If they didn't want to spend the level of money they did on the players they did then why did they sign the contacts involved?

I read an article that said Moody could sign off on contracts. Not sure if that's right.

All big contracts had to be ( as they are now) signed off at CEO/ director level. Plus Moody was never a signatory on the bank account to authorise the payments.

Maccydee is a huge tan apologist and ignores facts. He's ranger blame moody than face the truth that Tan fucked up spending 50m and blamed the whole thing on Malky n moody

No I'm not I'm not blinded because Malky used to fist pump.

Malky and Moody were in charge of player signings. Remember the dossier. It was after Cornelius not playing that Tan stopped trusting Malky and Moody and I don't blame him.