Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:32 pm

WTF was that sub, Watt was out on his feet (not match fit yet)
Jones having a good game, and instead of taking off Watt, he took off Jones, Slade really is clueless, he must have told them at half time, right boys we are 2-0 up, dont attack so much but just sit back and protect that lead, that worked well didn't it. Time for him to go :wave:

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:37 pm

better still Noone was down injures holding his arm !
the manager is clueless. really need Bellamy in soon so he can judge whose good enough and whose not.
personally i think we got good enough players. just havnt got a manager who can close out a game

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:38 pm

I literally knew straight away that fans would blame Slade's sub if Wednesday equalized, our fans are so predictable :laughing6:

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:43 pm

JonCCFC wrote:I literally knew straight away that fans would blame Slade's sub if Wednesday equalized, our fans are so predictable :laughing6:


I literally knew straight away that when they scored their first that they would get an equalizer. Our team is so predictable.

Did Slade replace Pilkington with Fabio to try to win the game or to make sure we didn't lose?

I could not work that one out.

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 7:08 pm

To stop us losing the game, a decent manager would have brought macheda on earlier instead of watt

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 7:21 pm

JonCCFC wrote:I literally knew straight away that fans would blame Slade's sub if Wednesday equalized, our fans are so predictable :laughing6:


Maybe because you thought it was well :lol:

Thought Jones was excellent second half but did little first half.

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 8:38 pm

Igovernor wrote:WTF was that sub, Watt was out on his feet (not match fit yet)
Jones having a good game, and instead of taking off Watt, he took off Jones, Slade really is clueless, he must have told them at half time, right boys we are 2-0 up, dont attack so much but just sit back and protect that lead, that worked well didn't it. Time for him to go :wave:

Well overdue should have gone ages ago :sladeout:

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 10:28 pm

Igovernor wrote:To stop us losing the game, a decent manager would have brought macheda on earlier instead of watt

Fans were criticizing Slade two weeks ago for bringing on Macheda, he just can't win with any of you :lol:

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 11:06 pm

JonCCFC wrote:
Igovernor wrote:To stop us losing the game, a decent manager would have brought macheda on earlier instead of watt

Fans were criticizing Slade two weeks ago for bringing on Macheda, he just can't win with any of you :lol:


It does depend on the situation though. You can't just say that.

Did you think his subs were correct?
Would you have made the same changed upfront?

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 11:24 pm

When other managers make changes of formation when there teams are losing in an effort to get back in the game uncle festor does nothing to counter these changes.He only subs like for like.He has no imagination and we are to predictable.
If we get anywhere this season it will be despite of him not because of him.
We have the players let them play.

Re: SLADE

Sat Dec 12, 2015 11:28 pm

Briwnantbluebird wrote:When other managers make changes of formation when there teams are losing in an effort to get back in the game uncle festor does nothing to counter these changes.He only subs like for like.He has no imagination and we are to predictable.
If we get anywhere this season it will be despite of him not because of him.
We have the players let them play.

Spot on.

Re: SLADE

Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:06 am

2blue2handle wrote:
JonCCFC wrote:
Igovernor wrote:To stop us losing the game, a decent manager would have brought macheda on earlier instead of watt

Fans were criticizing Slade two weeks ago for bringing on Macheda, he just can't win with any of you :lol:


It does depend on the situation though. You can't just say that.

Did you think his subs were correct?
Would you have made the same changed upfront?

I don't think it was a bad sub, I think it was a sensible decision. Jones always becomes lazy as the game goes on and even fans were singing Ameobi's name before he came on. That substitution didn't cost us the game, the fact we stopped attacking and dropped deep once we conceded is what cost us once again.

The Pilkington/Fabio sub was an odd one but it was at a time when Wednesday were in total control in the last few minutes, so bringing on an extra defender in those circumstances made sense.

Re: SLADE

Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:12 am

You shouldn't be surprised. The man has no idea what to do in terms of substitutions or changing tactics during the match.

Clueless.

Re: SLADE

Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:12 am

JonCCFC wrote:
2blue2handle wrote:
JonCCFC wrote:
Igovernor wrote:To stop us losing the game, a decent manager would have brought macheda on earlier instead of watt

Fans were criticizing Slade two weeks ago for bringing on Macheda, he just can't win with any of you :lol:


It does depend on the situation though. You can't just say that.

Did you think his subs were correct?
Would you have made the same changed upfront?

I don't think it was a bad sub, I think it was a sensible decision. Jones always becomes lazy as the game goes on and even fans were singing Ameobi's name before he came on. That substitution didn't cost us the game, the fact we stopped attacking and dropped deep once we conceded is what cost us once again.

The Pilkington/Fabio sub was an odd one but it was at a time when Wednesday were in total control in the last few minutes, so bringing on an extra defender in those circumstances made sense.


Personally I felt we dropped very deep second half although we did blow a couple of chanxwz early that half. It was massively open for some reason.

Disagree about Jones, felt he was uselesz first half but was dominating second half until he was taken off.


Sub's didn't cost us, our mentality the second half did and if that's down to Slade. Whatever he said or didn't say cost us and his inability to react to situations is mad.

How many months after everyone said ralls in the middle did it take him to do it?

Re: SLADE

Sun Dec 13, 2015 9:25 am

We only play one half. That's Slades way. I haven't seen a game this season where we have played well in both halves. The result of this approach means we will finish half way down the league and half way up it. SLADE is a bit like the grand old duke of York,his team tactics are to march up the hill then to March down again.Tackle and attack one half , stand off and let them score the second,he is a very nice man. I have finally come around to liking him. Thank you Slade . I really hope another club doesn't come in for him, it would ruin my Xmas. :blob8: :blob8: :blob2: :blob3: :blob6: :blob7:

Re: SLADE

Sun Dec 13, 2015 10:21 am

Lets get one thing straight, Slade has watched more games of professional football than anyone of us, so this is not inexperience, this is philosophy. He will not budge from his beliefs and in my opinion as a fan is wrong. He has been a professional football manager 20 years more than i have, but in my business I have had to evolve and things I learnt in college in the 80's are no longer relevant in today's world. I have had to adapt.

His inability to adapt is the reason he needs to be moved upstairs. He is obviously a good administrator and trusted within the senior management but as a tactician in 2016 he is found wanting.

Both home games had the same MO. We somehow got a lead, well done. The opposition heavily gamble and overload the middle pushing their line up by 20 metres. We are now playing with four players out the game. Our 2 wingers and both strikers. Even when they drop they don't have the attributes to compete. The oppositions gamble should lead to a counter attack, but with Watt and Jones out on their feet after 60 mins we can't.

TAKE BOTH STRIKERS OFF & REPLACE WITH ONE STRIKER & MIDFIELDER !!!!!

But this is 433 and not in his armoury.There is a reason 442 is almost extinct at the top level it ends up 424