Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

" This Sat £387mill team v £2.7mill team in Premier "

Thu Dec 10, 2015 3:51 pm

Man Utd take their £387m squad to #afcb on #SNF to take on a starting XI which cost £2.7m

Bournemouth v Manchester United


By Peter Smith

10/12/15


Bournemouth come up against Premier League heavyweights Manchester United on Saturday Night Football - and the contrast between the two clubs is stark.

The Cherries stunned defending champions Chelsea 1-0 at Stamford Bridge last weekend and United, dumped out of the Champions League in midweek, will not have it all their own way at Vitality Stadium.

But when it comes to trophy hauls, record transfer fees and the cost of each team's starting XI last weekend the difference is clear.

Re: " This Sat £387mill team v £2.7mill team in Premier "

Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:18 pm

And I hope bournemouth stuff them... :ayatollah:

Re: " This Sat £387mill team v £2.7mill team in Premier "

Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:25 pm

krabb wrote:And I hope bournemouth stuff them... :ayatollah:


Hope so aswell.

Re: " This Sat £387mill team v £2.7mill team in Premier "

Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:51 pm

Bournemouth play some lovely football & from what I have seen deserve to stay up.

Re: " This Sat £387mill team v £2.7mill team in Premier "

Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:44 pm

neathbluebird wrote:Bournemouth play some lovely football & from what I have seen deserve to stay up.


:thumbup:

Re: " This Sat £387mill team v £2.7mill team in Premier "

Fri Dec 11, 2015 5:36 am

Bournemouth play with the same fluidity as last season they are more than capable of getting a result. When is call um Wilson back?

Re: " This Sat £387mill team v £2.7mill team in Premier "

Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:16 pm

Sky website

Christian Atsu Chelsea Loan
e Bennett Aston Villa Loan
Artur BorucSouthampton Free
Filippo Costa Chievo Loan
Sylvain Distin Unassigned Players Free
Max Gradel St Etienne Undisclosed
Tyrone Mings Ipswich Town £8.0m
Glenn Murray Crystal Palace £4.0m
Lee Tomlin Middlesbrough £3.5m

Yeah, its not the same, but these are not paupers