" Russell Slade options "

'Our options up front are limited' said Noddy Slade post Ipswich. Well, yes....when you send out a load of strikers on loan to reduce wages at Vinnie the Red's bidding! Doyle and Healey should've been kept.

It would have been far better to have sent Mason and Revell out on loan instead, in my humble opinion of course

Did you see Doyle last night, was terrible, did not do anything and was subbed on 59 minutes

End of last season Doyle showed real promise, just like Kennedy.

It would have been far better to have sent Mason and Revell out on loan instead, in my humble opinion of course

Do not agree about Mason, he has scored 5 goals for us.

Resign?

Cheer us up Russell, you know it makes sense!

Did you see Doyle last night, was terrible, did not do anything and was subbed on 59 minutes

Maybe it was right loaning him out.

It would have been far better to have sent Mason and Revell out on loan instead, in my humble opinion of course

Do not agree about Mason, he has scored 5 goals for us.

In reality you could have real quality strikers up front for us,but with our labourus and predictable midfield they would be as impotent as the mediocre strikers we have now

Recall healey and start him! He's got to do better than mason and revell They're shit

He has more than enough personnel for a 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 formation. Even a 4-5-1 if he wants continue not scoring goals..
But he sure has the man love for 4-4-2, and its not going to be dropped, no matter what.. Maybe Peltier can stand in for Turner as a striker?

Don't see why we can't just recall some of our strikers who are out on loan?