' Did Mason dive video? '

I think he did watching this a few times over again, although it looked a cert from the stands

Very inconclusive goalie went for ball not mason! Think mason new what was going to happen and instead of trying to go over keeper decided to go through him and it didn't work out! Looked as if ball going away from him after the touch.

Wasn't sure at the time but after seeing that video..........that's definitely a foul.
The keeper has dived in Masons way and may or may not have touched him, but in doing so has hindered Masons run and chances of getting to the ball.
PENALTY!

That's a stonewall penalty. Awful decision by the ref.

Def a penalty watching the replays, wrong decision by ref...

Looking at that, it doesn't look like the keeper touched Mason at all. Sadly, it looks like Mason jumps over the keeper and dives. No contact and no penalty for me.

It's 50/50
unfortunately for us the ref went the keepers way
but I would be gutted if given agaisnt us

I'm in family end that was direct in front of me and I thought it was a dive at the time. Watching it back it is definitely dive, he was playing for it and actually missed the keeper trying to get contact

No reason to dive, he would have scored if he went around him.

Masons hands was in the air before any contact so was clearly looking for it

Should be a red card for diving its killed the British game

Definite penalty the keeper went for the ball with his right hand missed it and put his left arm up towards Mason's body which obstructed him the dive might have been a bit over the top but they get given 9 out of 10 times

It's the sort of situation where he could have jumped it but at the same time he's fully entitled to take the contact.

His trouble is he jumped it and tried to claim contact.

Didn't the lino flag for a penalty?

Didn't the lino flag for a penalty?

not from what i saw, he waved flag above head! unless someone saw him after that put it across his chest to signal pen, but surely if that was case ref would not go against him?

Definite penalty - and red card for keeper.

Bad call by referee.

They may even up over a season (or not) but at this stage in the season we're due a few.

I was directly behind the goal and I thought it was a penalty as Mason had knocked the ball past the keeper, but not far enough for him not to have had a tap in, and in the process of jumping over the keeper, who had totally committed himself, was caught by the keepers right arm which was raised and had grabbed at Mason's leg with his hand.

100% penalty, 100 % red card just another poor decision by the referee on Saturday, like the hand ball in the 2nd half.

You can see clear contact between the keeper and masons left leg/foot, so it's a pen.

It wasn't a lot of contact, but the keepers got none of the ball and completely blocked off mason. If mason could have scored, he would have. If he wanted a cheap penalty, he could have easily just kicked the keeper to create obvious contact.

It's quite clear imo that he tries to avoid the keeper, but is impeaded and thus goes down. I'm just glad we got the 3 points and this didn't cost us.

Mason appeared to make a lot of it, but there was contact and he would've gone on to score. A pen and red card. For second successive week an awful decision.

I was sat directly in line with it and initially thought he played for it after he left it too late to decide what to do. Nothing has changed my mind about that. The goalie came out and he ran into him

I was sat directly in line with it and initially thought he played for it after he left it too late to decide what to do. Nothing has changed my mind about that. The goalie came out and he ran into him

what was goalie suppose to do he clearly goes for ball ahead of mason! mason didn't make any attempt go avoid collision and like you say he played for it?

I was sat directly in line with it and initially thought he played for it after he left it too late to decide what to do. Nothing has changed my mind about that. The goalie came out and he ran into him

what was goalie suppose to do he clearly goes for ball ahead of mason! mason didn't make any attempt go avoid collision and like you say he played for it?

Um, he pretty clearly did try to avoid collision. If he didn't jump right before the contact was made (whether there actually was any or not), then the keeper would have clattered him. The keeper has got none of the ball and clearly impeded Joe.

I was sat directly in line with it and initially thought he played for it after he left it too late to decide what to do. Nothing has changed my mind about that. The goalie came out and he ran into him

what was goalie suppose to do he clearly goes for ball ahead of mason! mason didn't make any attempt go avoid collision and like you say he played for it?

Um, he pretty clearly did try to avoid collision. If he didn't jump right before the contact was made (whether there actually was any or not), then the keeper would have clattered him. The keeper has got none of the ball and clearly impeded Joe.

Just shows how hard it was to say in an instant the ref had making decision? At end day goalie entitled to go for Ball which he clearly Doe's , he doesn't go for Mason what Else is he to do say after you Mason your 1st?

Is this thread still going? We were right on top of it and the GK should have been sent off. Even the Charlton fans thought so! Just booking my Brighton tickets and hope that the ref on the day doesn't repeat the two potentially game changing howlers that have happened to us in the last two games.

As it's the Brighton trip, I'm also issuing complimentary safety t-shirts on our coach emblazoned with the words 'NO BUMMING' on the front and back to ward off the Seagulls despicable Brown-Hatter firm.

I was sat directly in line with it and initially thought he played for it after he left it too late to decide what to do. Nothing has changed my mind about that. The goalie came out and he ran into him

what was goalie suppose to do he clearly goes for ball ahead of mason! mason didn't make any attempt go avoid collision and like you say he played for it?

Um, he pretty clearly did try to avoid collision. If he didn't jump right before the contact was made (whether there actually was any or not), then the keeper would have clattered him. The keeper has got none of the ball and clearly impeded Joe.

You know after jumping over a keeper you don't have to roll around after it? He could have jumped over him and scored an open goal

I was sat directly in line with it and initially thought he played for it after he left it too late to decide what to do. Nothing has changed my mind about that. The goalie came out and he ran into him

There is no reason for Mason to go down whatsoever if there is no contact, hard to tell from that clip if there is any contact. I don't think there is any contact though.

If it was a dive then he should be warned by Slade IMO.

what was goalie suppose to do he clearly goes for ball ahead of mason! mason didn't make any attempt go avoid collision and like you say he played for it?

Um, he pretty clearly did try to avoid collision. If he didn't jump right before the contact was made (whether there actually was any or not), then the keeper would have clattered him. The keeper has got none of the ball and clearly impeded Joe.

You know after jumping over a keeper you don't have to roll around after it? He could have jumped over him and scored an open goal