Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

digashwee

Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:16 pm

BBC radio Wales....

Re: digashwee

Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:21 pm

apparently thats the way he likes it pronounced re. discussion last week on radio wales!

Re: digashwee

Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:26 pm

that's how it's pronounced :lol:

Re: digashwee

Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:29 pm

I thought we signed a new player lol

Re: digashwee

Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:33 pm

However he spells it he laid on a goal for Mason, and shot just over the bar from 35 yards out :thumbup:

Re: digashwee

Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:33 pm

I first heard it said that way on Fifa and thought it was a glitch :lol:

Re: digashwee

Tue Aug 18, 2015 7:33 pm

That's how you pronounce it, nobody spells or pronounces his name right.

Re: digashwee

Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:37 am

I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?

Re: digashwee

Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:19 am

PC BBC again and Match of the Day is the same when Jonathan Pearce try's to pronounce players names.

I would love to hear a foreign commentator pronounce names in Geordie or Scouse accent ffs

Re: digashwee

Thu Aug 20, 2015 2:59 pm

From the Fulham programme :thumbright:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: digashwee

Thu Aug 20, 2015 9:23 pm

worcester_ccfc wrote:From the Fulham programme :thumbright:



All I noticed there is that his middle name is 'evidence'!????

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 7:51 am

nubbsy wrote:
worcester_ccfc wrote:From the Fulham programme :thumbright:



All I noticed there is that his middle name is 'evidence'!????


Look at the very bottom of the programme.

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:18 am

nubbsy wrote:
worcester_ccfc wrote:From the Fulham programme :thumbright:



All I noticed there is that his middle name is 'evidence'!????


I think the evidence is clear for all to see m'lud. I rest my case!

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:19 am

davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:29 am

RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:35 am

City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:38 am

tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:43 am

City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

you know me Phil, I will debate and have a laugh with the best but what I can't stand is people that know fukall about football, players and what their job is and continue to have an agenda against certain players just because they 'hate' them. Get my point Phil? It's plain to see that RYAN knows fukall about football, end of :thumbup:

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:59 am

tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

you know me Phil, I will debate and have a laugh with the best but what I can't stand is people that know fukall about football, players and what their job is and continue to have an agenda against certain players just because they 'hate' them. Get my point Phil? It's plain to see that RYAN knows fukall about football, end of :thumbup:


Sorry Steve, disagree on that one, its only a bit of fun. Its not the Holocaust or anything. And in fairness to Ryan how on earth can you say he knows fukall about football? You probably don't know Ryan just like I don't. There's more to life than bring a bodyguard for a particular idol of yours!

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 10:19 am

City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

you know me Phil, I will debate and have a laugh with the best but what I can't stand is people that know fukall about football, players and what their job is and continue to have an agenda against certain players just because they 'hate' them. Get my point Phil? It's plain to see that RYAN knows fukall about football, end of :thumbup:


Sorry Steve, disagree on that one, its only a bit of fun. Its not the Holocaust or anything. And in fairness to Ryan how on earth can you say he knows fukall about football? You probably don't know Ryan just like I don't. There's more to life than bring a bodyguard for a particular idol of yours!

whether I know him or not is quite irrelevant, I only have to read the drivel he posts and that tells me everything, as for being a bodyguard to a particular 'idol' of mine, I would defend any player that plays for Cardiff City even if I don't like them but this shit that Whitts keeps getting is getting out of hand to be honest. I'll say no more as you can't see what I see when it comes to Whittingham as you don't like him. I like the banter with you but I will no longer debate as I don't want to lose the friendship we have on here. I'm getting myself wound up because I believe now that some are just on a wind-up so that's me done.
One last thing Phil, he has derailed a thread about Dikgacoi because of his hatred for Whitts when the thread had nothing to do with it. See what I mean by drivel.

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 11:53 am

tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

you know me Phil, I will debate and have a laugh with the best but what I can't stand is people that know fukall about football, players and what their job is and continue to have an agenda against certain players just because they 'hate' them. Get my point Phil? It's plain to see that RYAN knows fukall about football, end of :thumbup:


Sorry Steve, disagree on that one, its only a bit of fun. Its not the Holocaust or anything. And in fairness to Ryan how on earth can you say he knows fukall about football? You probably don't know Ryan just like I don't. There's more to life than bring a bodyguard for a particular idol of yours!

whether I know him or not is quite irrelevant, I only have to read the drivel he posts and that tells me everything, as for being a bodyguard to a particular 'idol' of mine, I would defend any player that plays for Cardiff City even if I don't like them but this shit that Whitts keeps getting is getting out of hand to be honest. I'll say no more as you can't see what I see when it comes to Whittingham as you don't like him. I like the banter with you but I will no longer debate as I don't want to lose the friendship we have on here. I'm getting myself wound up because I believe now that some are just on a wind-up so that's me done.
One last thing Phil, he has derailed a thread about Dikgacoi because of his hatred for Whitts when the thread had nothing to do with it. See what I mean by drivel.


Absolutely perfectly said mate.
An opinion that differs or a bit of banter is fine but the constant agenda from the same few against certain players is tiresome - again & again & again.
Spot on Tenerife.

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 12:15 pm

tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

you know me Phil, I will debate and have a laugh with the best but what I can't stand is people that know fukall about football, players and what their job is and continue to have an agenda against certain players just because they 'hate' them. Get my point Phil? It's plain to see that RYAN knows fukall about football, end of :thumbup:


Sorry Steve, disagree on that one, its only a bit of fun. Its not the Holocaust or anything. And in fairness to Ryan how on earth can you say he knows fukall about football? You probably don't know Ryan just like I don't. There's more to life than bring a bodyguard for a particular idol of yours!

whether I know him or not is quite irrelevant, I only have to read the drivel he posts and that tells me everything, as for being a bodyguard to a particular 'idol' of mine, I would defend any player that plays for Cardiff City even if I don't like them but this shit that Whitts keeps getting is getting out of hand to be honest. I'll say no more as you can't see what I see when it comes to Whittingham as you don't like him. I like the banter with you but I will no longer debate as I don't want to lose the friendship we have on here. I'm getting myself wound up because I believe now that some are just on a wind-up so that's me done.
One last thing Phil, he has derailed a thread about Dikgacoi because of his hatred for Whitts when the thread had nothing to do with it. See what I mean by drivel.


Couldn't agree more Steve.

I'll criticise some players, including Whittingham, if they face a poor game. But some people cross the line by constantly making comments about the same players - sometimes before a match has even started.

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 1:29 pm

worcester_ccfc wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

you know me Phil, I will debate and have a laugh with the best but what I can't stand is people that know fukall about football, players and what their job is and continue to have an agenda against certain players just because they 'hate' them. Get my point Phil? It's plain to see that RYAN knows fukall about football, end of :thumbup:


Sorry Steve, disagree on that one, its only a bit of fun. Its not the Holocaust or anything. And in fairness to Ryan how on earth can you say he knows fukall about football? You probably don't know Ryan just like I don't. There's more to life than bring a bodyguard for a particular idol of yours!

whether I know him or not is quite irrelevant, I only have to read the drivel he posts and that tells me everything, as for being a bodyguard to a particular 'idol' of mine, I would defend any player that plays for Cardiff City even if I don't like them but this shit that Whitts keeps getting is getting out of hand to be honest. I'll say no more as you can't see what I see when it comes to Whittingham as you don't like him. I like the banter with you but I will no longer debate as I don't want to lose the friendship we have on here. I'm getting myself wound up because I believe now that some are just on a wind-up so that's me done.
One last thing Phil, he has derailed a thread about Dikgacoi because of his hatred for Whitts when the thread had nothing to do with it. See what I mean by drivel.


Couldn't agree more Steve.

I'll criticise some players, including Whittingham, if they face a poor game. But some people cross the line by constantly making comments about the same players - sometimes before a match has even started.

You are right, of course. And I agree. But as long as Macheda is an exception.

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 4:12 pm

worcester_ccfc wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

you know me Phil, I will debate and have a laugh with the best but what I can't stand is people that know fukall about football, players and what their job is and continue to have an agenda against certain players just because they 'hate' them. Get my point Phil? It's plain to see that RYAN knows fukall about football, end of :thumbup:


Sorry Steve, disagree on that one, its only a bit of fun. Its not the Holocaust or anything. And in fairness to Ryan how on earth can you say he knows fukall about football? You probably don't know Ryan just like I don't. There's more to life than bring a bodyguard for a particular idol of yours!

whether I know him or not is quite irrelevant, I only have to read the drivel he posts and that tells me everything, as for being a bodyguard to a particular 'idol' of mine, I would defend any player that plays for Cardiff City even if I don't like them but this shit that Whitts keeps getting is getting out of hand to be honest. I'll say no more as you can't see what I see when it comes to Whittingham as you don't like him. I like the banter with you but I will no longer debate as I don't want to lose the friendship we have on here. I'm getting myself wound up because I believe now that some are just on a wind-up so that's me done.
One last thing Phil, he has derailed a thread about Dikgacoi because of his hatred for Whitts when the thread had nothing to do with it. See what I mean by drivel.


Couldn't agree more Steve.

I'll criticise some players, including Whittingham, if they face a poor game. But some people cross the line by constantly making comments about the same players - sometimes before a match has even started.

Ned, it really gets my goat up. Some on here would still criticize Whittingham if he scored a hatrick and got 3 assists just because they have an agenda. As you know I admire Whittingham because I see what he does for the team when played in the right position, on and off the ball but some refuse to see anything good in him just because they have an agenda and can't see past that, having saying that I did say that Whitts had a below par game on Tuesday as did all the midfield. I will say it as it is whoever the player is.

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 4:37 pm

I blame the manager for picking him when hes off form.

He would benefit from being given a break.

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 4:48 pm

Depressed Blue wrote:I blame the manager for picking him when hes off form.

He would benefit from being given a break.


Nonce.

Re: digashwee

Fri Aug 21, 2015 6:53 pm

tenerife_blu wrote:
worcester_ccfc wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:


Oh come on Steve, lighten up and join the party! :lol:

you know me Phil, I will debate and have a laugh with the best but what I can't stand is people that know fukall about football, players and what their job is and continue to have an agenda against certain players just because they 'hate' them. Get my point Phil? It's plain to see that RYAN knows fukall about football, end of :thumbup:


Sorry Steve, disagree on that one, its only a bit of fun. Its not the Holocaust or anything. And in fairness to Ryan how on earth can you say he knows fukall about football? You probably don't know Ryan just like I don't. There's more to life than bring a bodyguard for a particular idol of yours!

whether I know him or not is quite irrelevant, I only have to read the drivel he posts and that tells me everything, as for being a bodyguard to a particular 'idol' of mine, I would defend any player that plays for Cardiff City even if I don't like them but this shit that Whitts keeps getting is getting out of hand to be honest. I'll say no more as you can't see what I see when it comes to Whittingham as you don't like him. I like the banter with you but I will no longer debate as I don't want to lose the friendship we have on here. I'm getting myself wound up because I believe now that some are just on a wind-up so that's me done.
One last thing Phil, he has derailed a thread about Dikgacoi because of his hatred for Whitts when the thread had nothing to do with it. See what I mean by drivel.


Couldn't agree more Steve.

I'll criticise some players, including Whittingham, if they face a poor game. But some people cross the line by constantly making comments about the same players - sometimes before a match has even started.

Ned, it really gets my goat up. Some on here would still criticize Whittingham if he scored a hatrick and got 3 assists just because they have an agenda. As you know I admire Whittingham because I see what he does for the team when played in the right position, on and off the ball but some refuse to see anything good in him just because they have an agenda and can't see past that, having saying that I did say that Whitts had a below par game on Tuesday as did all the midfield. I will say it as it is whoever the player is.


Completely agree mate. I'm more than happy to say when a player hasn't played well, like I do with Revell after every game. But people take it too far with Whittingham. As I've said before, Malky ruined him.

Nothing wrong with criticising someone's performance because it's about opinions but as you say some people seem to have an agenda.

Re: digashwee

Sat Aug 22, 2015 7:40 am

worcester_ccfc wrote:Completely agree mate. I'm more than happy to say when a player hasn't played well, like I do with Revell after every game. But people take it too far with Whittingham. As I've said before, Malky ruined him.

Nothing wrong with criticising someone's performance because it's about opinions but as you say some people seem to have an agenda.

:ayatollah: :thumbup: see you later mate

Re: digashwee

Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:32 am

tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:

and true :sladein: :bluescarf: :bluebird:

Re: digashwee

Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:36 am

troobloo3339 wrote:
tenerife_blu wrote:
City Slicker wrote:
RYANBLUE wrote:
davids wrote:I wonder if we could save some money by only paying him three quarters of his wages as he can only play for three quarters of a game?


Fuk me - Whitts would be free if thats the case


That's a corker Ryan :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

that's pathetic :roll:

and true :sladein: :bluescarf: :bluebird:

you're just an idiot :thumbup: :wave: