Sat Aug 08, 2015 10:23 pm
Sun Aug 09, 2015 7:54 am
Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:06 am
ömoonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?
Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:09 am
Pontypool_Bluebird wrote:ömoonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?
We were 1 nil down and showed great desire to get a point. Simple. Stop reading nonsense into it just to be negative. It was a huge improvement last year, nice to see us passing the ball around. Our fans just want to moan at everything.
Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:17 am
Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:21 am
moonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?
Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:30 am
Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:40 am
JayCee wrote:moonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?
I don't agree with that, far too critical. I haven't heard Slade's interview but judging by the way he usually constructs sentences heis probably saying we did well to battle back and get the point, nit that he was inly hoing after a point. We sat back for a but after equalising but they were pretty slick when they came out to arrack. All in all that was much better than last year, certainly not perfect and we still need another creative midfielder and a bigger mobile goal scorer but the passing, control and chances carved out far surpassed 90% of last yesr's games. Pilkington faded and Whits has another off game but Ralls was excellent, looked very promising and played some great passes. The defence was solid but still susceptible ti balls over the top. We've boughtno one but managed to compete and the team really looked up for it. I was expecting Fulham to clean us out with the players they've bought but they didn't come close. If we continue getting better and can add the missing players we've git a chance. Unfortunately we need to sacrifice Marshall to get them. Moore may come good, I hope he dies, he showed inexperience but that is because he is. Give him a chance too.
Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:54 am
moonstomper1927 wrote:JayCee wrote:moonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?
You can be as critical as you like but don't let your anti-Slade feelings cloud your judgement as it plainly has here.But your not on your own.What also stiicks out like a sore thumb this morning is the lack of anti-Slade bollocks being posted in general.Most of the anti-Slade brigade are wondering if Slade gets it right they'll have to re-invent themselves to have any credibility.Its so easy when your an internet warrior,just post any old bollocks and if you don't get it right instead of manning up just go and get yourself a new identity.
I don't agree with that, far too critical. I haven't heard Slade's interview but judging by the way he usually constructs sentences heis probably saying we did well to battle back and get the point, nit that he was inly hoing after a point. We sat back for a but after equalising but they were pretty slick when they came out to arrack. All in all that was much better than last year, certainly not perfect and we still need another creative midfielder and a bigger mobile goal scorer but the passing, control and chances carved out far surpassed 90% of last yesr's games. Pilkington faded and Whits has another off game but Ralls was excellent, looked very promising and played some great passes. The defence was solid but still susceptible ti balls over the top. We've boughtno one but managed to compete and the team really looked up for it. I was expecting Fulham to clean us out with the players they've bought but they didn't come close. If we continue getting better and can add the missing players we've git a chance. Unfortunately we need to sacrifice Marshall to get them. Moore may come good, I hope he dies, he showed inexperience but that is because he is. Give him a chance too.
Reading my post I must admit it is a tad on the critical side. There were many positive sides to our play I thought were very good and yes a big improvement on last year.
But no matter how critical it comes across I don’t want Moore to ‘die’
Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:09 am
Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:17 am
Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:00 am
moonstomper1927 wrote:JayCee wrote:moonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?
Whoops, nor me, fat fingers, small keyboard![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't agree with that, far too critical. I haven't heard Slade's interview but judging by the way he usually constructs sentences heis probably saying we did well to battle back and get the point, nit that he was inly hoing after a point. We sat back for a but after equalising but they were pretty slick when they came out to arrack. All in all that was much better than last year, certainly not perfect and we still need another creative midfielder and a bigger mobile goal scorer but the passing, control and chances carved out far surpassed 90% of last yesr's games. Pilkington faded and Whits has another off game but Ralls was excellent, looked very promising and played some great passes. The defence was solid but still susceptible ti balls over the top. We've boughtno one but managed to compete and the team really looked up for it. I was expecting Fulham to clean us out with the players they've bought but they didn't come close. If we continue getting better and can add the missing players we've git a chance. Unfortunately we need to sacrifice Marshall to get them. Moore may come good, I hope he dies, he showed inexperience but that is because he is. Give him a chance too.
Reading my post I must admit it is a tad on the critical side. There were many positive sides to our play I thought were very good and yes a big improvement on last year.
But no matter how critical it comes across I don’t want Moore to ‘die’
Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:02 am
JayCee wrote:moonstomper1927 wrote:JayCee wrote:moonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?
Whoops, nor me, fat fingers, small keyboard![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't agree with that, far too critical. I haven't heard Slade's interview but judging by the way he usually constructs sentences heis probably saying we did well to battle back and get the point, nit that he was inly hoing after a point. We sat back for a but after equalising but they were pretty slick when they came out to arrack. All in all that was much better than last year, certainly not perfect and we still need another creative midfielder and a bigger mobile goal scorer but the passing, control and chances carved out far surpassed 90% of last yesr's games. Pilkington faded and Whits has another off game but Ralls was excellent, looked very promising and played some great passes. The defence was solid but still susceptible ti balls over the top. We've boughtno one but managed to compete and the team really looked up for it. I was expecting Fulham to clean us out with the players they've bought but they didn't come close. If we continue getting better and can add the missing players we've git a chance. Unfortunately we need to sacrifice Marshall to get them. Moore may come good, I hope he dies, he showed inexperience but that is because he is. Give him a chance too.
Reading my post I must admit it is a tad on the critical side. There were many positive sides to our play I thought were very good and yes a big improvement on last year.
But no matter how critical it comes across I don’t want Moore to ‘die’
Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:32 am
Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:37 pm
JayCee wrote:moonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?
I don't agree with that, far too critical. I haven't heard Slade's interview but judging by the way he usually constructs sentences heis probably saying we did well to battle back and get the point, nit that he was inly hoing after a point. We sat back for a but after equalising but they were pretty slick when they came out to arrack. All in all that was much better than last year, certainly not perfect and we still need another creative midfielder and a bigger mobile goal scorer but the passing, control and chances carved out far surpassed 90% of last yesr's games. Pilkington faded and Whits has another off game but Ralls was excellent, looked very promising and played some great passes. The defence was solid but still susceptible ti balls over the top. We've boughtno one but managed to compete and the team really looked up for it. I was expecting Fulham to clean us out with the players they've bought but they didn't come close. If we continue getting better and can add the missing players we've git a chance. Unfortunately we need to sacrifice Marshall to get them. Moore may come good, I hope he dies, he showed inexperience but that is because he is. Give him a chance too.
Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:20 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Don't lose at all cost was malkies mantra it worked! Slade as changed way we play far to early to know if it will be successful after ten games better idea .
Sun Aug 09, 2015 6:34 pm
moonstomper1927 wrote:I don’t like what Russell is saying here, and his assessment of the game reflects the way his team played the game.
“Showed great desire to take a point” To me this statement shows a complete lack of ambition, and I have a feeling he’ll be repeating this sort of robotic management drivel for the rest of the season. Fulham won’t do anything this season, mid to lower half if they are lucky. He should be bitterly disappointed we didn’t win the game. Why is he delighted that we fought for a draw? We should have buried a mediocre team like Fulham in the first half
I thought we played too deep, gave the ball away too cheaply, particularly in mid field. We showed very little creativity and played with too much caution (hate to see an attack stop because of no options and we end up passing the ball back the length of the pitch to our keeper) Yes Pilkington did alright in the first half but to be honest he should have gone for goal a couple of times when he crossed the ball. Scot Malone was our only player for 60 minutes who showed any desire to push forward, without doubt the MOTM for me. Having the ability of taking people on and having go is what Noone did for us when he came on and that’s why he scored.
The team he picks and the way we play is obviously ’don’t lose at all cost’, winning is a bonus.
Early days I know but I can’t see Russell changing the way we play, I think we have a squad as good as most in this division; can the manager use them to their full potential?