Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:22 pm
Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:26 pm
Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:44 pm
langley wrote:Not sure if u were posting when he was here, but ' donkey ' was a name a lot of people called him on the message boards. Personally I think MAlky wasted him, should of played him a lot more.
Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:00 pm
Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:17 pm
wez1927 wrote:Come on he was Shit for us ,headless chicken with a touch of a rapist ,6 million is a gamble for villa especially after he's only had one good season
Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:19 pm
you must of been watching another player when he was with usPurple in Cwmbran wrote:wez1927 wrote:Come on he was Shit for us ,headless chicken with a touch of a rapist ,6 million is a gamble for villa especially after he's only had one good season
"Come on he was Shit for us" .............that's rubbish, to be fair.
Given how we played him, off bench, dead games, he did pretty damn well. And would have done better with better treatment. I remember watching once at The Vale and his touch and footwork were better than anyone on show. Honestly.
Played right, he was always going to progress.
That said, not sure Villa will be able to get the best from him. But I hope they do and well done to him.
Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:24 pm
wez1927 wrote:you must of been watching another player when he was with usPurple in Cwmbran wrote:wez1927 wrote:Come on he was Shit for us ,headless chicken with a touch of a rapist ,6 million is a gamble for villa especially after he's only had one good season
"Come on he was Shit for us" .............that's rubbish, to be fair.
Given how we played him, off bench, dead games, he did pretty damn well. And would have done better with better treatment. I remember watching once at The Vale and his touch and footwork were better than anyone on show. Honestly.
Played right, he was always going to progress.
That said, not sure Villa will be able to get the best from him. But I hope they do and well done to him.
Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:41 pm
Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:51 pm
Wayne S wrote:Very, very late for an update, it was known when we sold him that there was no sell on clause.
Or is it already "Have a dig Friday" again.
Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:17 pm
Purple in Cwmbran wrote:wez1927 wrote:you must of been watching another player when he was with usPurple in Cwmbran wrote:wez1927 wrote:Come on he was Shit for us ,headless chicken with a touch of a rapist ,6 million is a gamble for villa especially after he's only had one good season
"Come on he was Shit for us" .............that's rubbish, to be fair.
Given how we played him, off bench, dead games, he did pretty damn well. And would have done better with better treatment. I remember watching once at The Vale and his touch and footwork were better than anyone on show. Honestly.
Played right, he was always going to progress.
That said, not sure Villa will be able to get the best from him. But I hope they do and well done to him.
Maybe..... but I wrote this 3 years ago and a Premier League club are paying £6,000, 000 for him. Boy doing good, despite us.
................................................................
Re: Rudy Gestede for helguson?
Postby Purple in Cwmbran » Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:22 am
I struggle to see why everyone knocks Rudi. I don't think he has had enough time on the pitch to learn whether he can convert potential into form. And 'stumpy' Helguson gets credit for running around.....I thought he was meant to score goals? Connelly has scored more than our aging centre forward.
Was up The Vale on Thursday on business and took time out to watch a bit of training. Eight of the fringe players, including Rudi, were being put through their paces. The lad looked really professional. No dicking about. And when it came to quick, close ball work, his passing was really crisp and controlled. To me, he still looks like an option.
Good luck to him.
And maybe City fans should lay off the bandwagon and give the kid some encouragement.
Purple in Cwmbran
..........................................................................................
Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:19 pm
wez1927 wrote:you must of been watching another player when he was with usPurple in Cwmbran wrote:wez1927 wrote:Come on he was Shit for us ,headless chicken with a touch of a rapist ,6 million is a gamble for villa especially after he's only had one good season
"Come on he was Shit for us" .............that's rubbish, to be fair.
Given how we played him, off bench, dead games, he did pretty damn well. And would have done better with better treatment. I remember watching once at The Vale and his touch and footwork were better than anyone on show. Honestly.
Played right, he was always going to progress.
That said, not sure Villa will be able to get the best from him. But I hope they do and well done to him.
Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:20 pm
ThomasC wrote:Wayne S wrote:Very, very late for an update, it was known when we sold him that there was no sell on clause.
Or is it already "Have a dig Friday" again.
Whether you feel posters have a go at the club unfairly, you surely can't believe the club deserves no criticism of the amateurish way a young player was sold, and concequently sold on for millions a short time later.
Foolish and clearly an indication the management structure have no idea how to run a successful football club
Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:23 pm
Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:24 pm
Wayne S wrote:ThomasC wrote:Wayne S wrote:Very, very late for an update, it was known when we sold him that there was no sell on clause.
Or is it already "Have a dig Friday" again.
Whether you feel posters have a go at the club unfairly, you surely can't believe the club deserves no criticism of the amateurish way a young player was sold, and concequently sold on for millions a short time later.
Foolish and clearly an indication the management structure have no idea how to run a successful football club
It STILL ain't an update.
Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:27 pm
Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:45 pm
Santa Ponsa Blue wrote:Wayne S wrote:ThomasC wrote:Wayne S wrote:Very, very late for an update, it was known when we sold him that there was no sell on clause.
Or is it already "Have a dig Friday" again.
Whether you feel posters have a go at the club unfairly, you surely can't believe the club deserves no criticism of the amateurish way a young player was sold, and concequently sold on for millions a short time later.
Foolish and clearly an indication the management structure have no idea how to run a successful football club
It STILL ain't an update.
It is an update - Rudy Gestede signs for Aston Villa
Fri Jul 31, 2015 3:59 pm
Wayne S wrote:Santa Ponsa Blue wrote:Wayne S wrote:ThomasC wrote:Wayne S wrote:Very, very late for an update, it was known when we sold him that there was no sell on clause.
Or is it already "Have a dig Friday" again.
Whether you feel posters have a go at the club unfairly, you surely can't believe the club deserves no criticism of the amateurish way a young player was sold, and concequently sold on for millions a short time later.
Foolish and clearly an indication the management structure have no idea how to run a successful football club
It STILL ain't an update.
It is an update - Rudy Gestede signs for Aston Villa
Fantastic use of the Subject Line. Really encapsulates the main essence of the story.