Sun Jul 19, 2015 2:47 pm
Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:04 pm
Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:22 pm
Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:25 pm
not often I agree with you but I feel we need a new striker maybe two ,we a 20 goal a season striker Like ChopraBakedalasker wrote:We have never really replace Bothroyd or Chopra since they left.
Miller could not score, Maynard got injured and then there was Cornelious.
If we got 2 top quality strikers then yes we would be up there. Personally I feel that Macheda now needs to show his potential for us to stand a chance. I do believe Doyle will come good but hi along will not be enough. Of course we also need that midfielder as well.
Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:28 pm
wez1927 wrote:not often I agree with you but I feel we need a new striker maybe two ,we a 20 goal a season striker Like ChopraBakedalasker wrote:We have never really replace Bothroyd or Chopra since they left.
Miller could not score, Maynard got injured and then there was Cornelious.
If we got 2 top quality strikers then yes we would be up there. Personally I feel that Macheda now needs to show his potential for us to stand a chance. I do believe Doyle will come good but hi along will not be enough. Of course we also need that midfielder as well.
Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:42 pm
Lawnmower wrote:Mason and Macheda did OK IMHO.
Bigger problem was our outclassed central midfield .
Centre half a looked rusty as did Peltier and John.
Sun Jul 19, 2015 4:32 pm
Sun Jul 19, 2015 5:37 pm
moonboots wrote:Lawnmower wrote:Mason and Macheda did OK IMHO.
Bigger problem was our outclassed central midfield .
Centre half a looked rusty as did Peltier and John.
So are you saying the exact opposite to me? You think we need to strengthen at centre half, full back and centre midfield but we don't need new strikers. It's all about opinions I suppose. I said I'd keep Mason but we desperately need some quality to play alongside him. Macheda is too slow and too lazy but he does have a good knack of finishing. However, if you play him alongside Mason it's an attack without pace, an essential tool in my opinion. It makes us too easy to mark, too predictable. You said our central midfield was outclassed but they weren't in the first half. I thought we had the better of them in the first half and I suppose the point I am making is that if we added two quality strikers to that first half team we would be equipped to challenge near the top. Yes you pointed out that "Centre half a looked rusty as did Peltier and John" but we know that will improve with more games. Peltier is a decent defender as is Manga, Turner, Connolly and I thought Ajayi looked promising too. Yes, it would be nice to find a midfield general (their lad Ryan Woods looked ok) but in my opinion and given the choice I would sign two quality strikers above anywhere else.
Sun Jul 19, 2015 6:29 pm
Lawnmower wrote:moonboots wrote:Lawnmower wrote:Mason and Macheda did OK IMHO.
Bigger problem was our outclassed central midfield .
Centre half a looked rusty as did Peltier and John.
So are you saying the exact opposite to me? You think we need to strengthen at centre half, full back and centre midfield but we don't need new strikers. It's all about opinions I suppose. I said I'd keep Mason but we desperately need some quality to play alongside him. Macheda is too slow and too lazy but he does have a good knack of finishing. However, if you play him alongside Mason it's an attack without pace, an essential tool in my opinion. It makes us too easy to mark, too predictable. You said our central midfield was outclassed but they weren't in the first half. I thought we had the better of them in the first half and I suppose the point I am making is that if we added two quality strikers to that first half team we would be equipped to challenge near the top. Yes you pointed out that "Centre half a looked rusty as did Peltier and John" but we know that will improve with more games. Peltier is a decent defender as is Manga, Turner, Connolly and I thought Ajayi looked promising too. Yes, it would be nice to find a midfield general (their lad Ryan Woods looked ok) but in my opinion and given the choice I would sign two quality strikers above anywhere else.
No.
I was commenting on yesterday.
Overall, this is what I think....
At the moment I don't think we can expect anyone to come in.
No I don't think we need a centre half Turner and Manga are a top 6 pairing and Morrison and Connelly of GE stays are very good cover and also our full backs are ok. , I'd expect Peltier to do better than yesterday.
We've now got 4 decent wide men and still have competition in the middle. However yesterday I wasn't impressed here. Getting the right mix is a tough one for Slade.
As for strikers, we won't get another until at least 2 of Guerra, Jones and LeFondre leave. Their combined wages must be crippling.
If they go then yes we may get one and it would be good, however I'm not that disappointed with Doyle, Mason and Macheda with Revell to give a different option.
Another decent one would be good or maybe one of the 3 outcasts will sort themselves out and play their part ?
Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:15 pm
Mon Jul 20, 2015 8:31 am
Lawnmower wrote:No problem.
I guess I did go off on a bit of a tangent.
It's still possible for any of our strikers to shine.
My bet to shine would be Mason, but I wouldn't be surprised to see Macheda or Doyle score a load given decent service
Mon Jul 20, 2015 9:28 am