' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:45 pm
' Vincent Tans Latest Court Case '
Cardiff City aka Vincent Tan v Langston
As you all know Langston have taken this to Court, as the last payments have stopped,after £15million had already been paid to Langston
Tan seems to be in No rush to deal with the matter,dragging his heals and making sure that this case will take longer to conclude.
Costs are already running up.
Interesting.
I'm really looking forward to the outcome of this and how it ends.
Hmmmm?
Cardiff City aka Vincent Tan v Langston
As you all know Langston have taken this to Court, as the last payments have stopped,after £15million had already been paid to Langston
Tan seems to be in No rush to deal with the matter,dragging his heals and making sure that this case will take longer to conclude.
Costs are already running up.
Interesting.
I'm really looking forward to the outcome of this and how it ends.
Hmmmm?
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:54 pm
Sorry but this will not be correct. Parties can try and delay civil cases but the Judge sets the timetable and cases will only be delayed with his/her say so.
Simples.
Simples.
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:55 pm
piledriver64 wrote:Sorry but this will not be correct. Parties can try and delay civil cases but the Judge sets the timetable and cases will only be delayed with his/her say so.
Simples.
It is correct if papers are slowing down,replies etc and you have to go back to court to hurry them up
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:59 pm
Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Sorry but this will not be correct. Parties can try and delay civil cases but the Judge sets the timetable and cases will only be delayed with his/her say so.
Simples.
It is correct if papers are slowing down,replies etc and you have to go back to court to hurry them up
Annis I have been in a court case where this has happened. You are correct.
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:01 pm
carlccfc wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Sorry but this will not be correct. Parties can try and delay civil cases but the Judge sets the timetable and cases will only be delayed with his/her say so.
Simples.
It is correct if papers are slowing down,replies etc and you have to go back to court to hurry them up
Annis I have been in a court case where this has happened. You are correct.
Carl, Ive been in Family court cases,BBC court cases & Business cases where delaying tactics have been used by both sides.
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:07 pm
I think that Sam rubbed tan up the wrong way over the consortium links last season so he will make him wait for it stringing him along ,funny tho we are back in blue and nothing more mentioned about possible take overs
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:10 pm
wez1927 wrote:I think that Sam rubbed tan up the wrong way over the consortium links last season so he will make him wait for it stringing him along ,funny tho we are back in blue and nothing more mentioned about possible take overs
Wez, I think you might have some truth in that and watch Tan in time pay the lot plus interest,but he enjoys making people wait.
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 7:34 pm
How long has this been going on?
Aren't you all bored of this fiasco now?
Aren't you all bored of this fiasco now?
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 8:11 pm
wez1927 wrote:I think that Sam rubbed tan up the wrong way over the consortium links last season so he will make him wait for it stringing him along ,funny tho we are back in blue and nothing more mentioned about possible take overs
I think so.
Tbh it I was Tan I'd be lu I'd giving Sam anything as well.
Re: ' Vincent Tan in No Rush '
Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:59 pm
Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Sorry but this will not be correct. Parties can try and delay civil cases but the Judge sets the timetable and cases will only be delayed with his/her say so.
Simples.
It is correct if papers are slowing down,replies etc and you have to go back to court to hurry them up
That is right. The other side merely need to make an application to enforce compliance with directions.
If a party in a civil case (not family or criminal) makes is judged to be deliberately delaying the case without good reason their case/defence can be struck out or, more commonly, they will be penalised with a substantial order for costs against them. In the Sam v VT case neither of these things have happened, I wonder why ?