" £33Mill/£8.5Mill/£42.6Mill & £37.5Mill/Plus "

" £33Mill/£8.5Mill/£42.6Mill & £37.5Mill/Plus "

" Money spent just in the last 2 transfers to stay in the Premier League "

QPR Spent £33 Mill Now Relegated
Burnley Spent £8.5 Mill Now Relegated
Hull City Spent £42.6 Mill At mom 3rd from Bottom.
Newcastle Spent £37.5 Mill At mom 4th from Bottom.
Sunderland Spent £14 Mill At mom 5th From Bottom
Leicester Spent £20.7 Mill At mom 6th from Bottom.
Aston Villa Spent £9.9 Mill At mom 7th from bottom looking safe

Many clubs spend unbelievable amounts to stay up,then when they are relegated virtually skint,parachute payments just about save them.

Between Malky and Ole, City spent about £65 million Bad business from the very top,no control of our finances.

" Money spent just in the last 2 transfers to stay in the Premier League "

QPR Spent £33 Mill Now Relegated
Burnley Spent £8.5 Mill Now Relegated
Hull City Spent £42.6 Mill At mom 3rd from Bottom.
Newcastle Spent £37.5 Mill At mom 4th from Bottom.
Sunderland Spent £14 Mill At mom 5th From Bottom
Leicester Spent £20.7 Mill At mom 6th from Bottom.
Aston Villa Spent £9.9 Mill At mom 7th from bottom looking safe

Many clubs spend unbelievable amounts to stay up,then when they are relegated virtually skint,parachute payments just about save them.

Between Malky and Ole, City spent about £65 million Bad business from the very top,no control of our finances.

have to agree malky was the worst Like a kid in a sweet shop ,I can't help feeling that Dave Jones would if done better with the money than all of them

From FB

Peter D Collins People blame malky for over spending yet Imo if we kept him as manager for full season we would stayed up in the prem

No guarantees we would have stayed up under malky
and he was as much to blame for the spending of the money
he was trusted and let them and us down

No guarantees we would have stayed up under malky
and he was as much to blame for the spending of the money
he was trusted and let them and us down

I will always like Malky and Respect him for what he achieved at Cardiff City

Your right no guarantee,but I believe he would of.

Fair enough
but after spending 65m staying up would have been a min
malky did a great job but was supportered in the market like no other
People like to forget that

Fair enough
but after spending 65m staying up would have been a min
malky did a great job but was supportered in the market like no other
People like to forget that

He was supported and some of that money Ole spent as well.

Yes Malky was given money,but was also had Tan on his back 24/7.

I think there are two ways of looking at it

Firstly on the face of it Malky spent £47m and only made £6m in transfers received - net spend £41m
Ole spent £21m but made £26m - net spend -£5m
Slade spent £1.2m but made £1.7m - net spend -£0.5m

Obviously this makes Malky look completely incompetent BUT

The players Malky spent £47m on have been sold for £30m and we still have T-C, Moore, Noone, Connolly, Turner, Mason, Gunnarsson and Harris who may have some value. Net spend £17m
The players Ole spent £21m on have recouped only £1m so far with Manga, Morrison, Le Fondre, Adeyemi, Fabio and Pilkington still around. Net spend £20m

To me this makes Malky look like a genius because he effectively got all that TV money in return for £17m where as Ole spent more and left us with the squad we currently have. Obviously won't know final amounts until there are no Malky or Ole players left.

I've taken all the values from transfermarkt website. It shows ? for the sales of Gestede, Conway and Taylor and the purchase of Healey so Malky's figures are probably slightly better than shown.

No guarantees we would have stayed up under malky
and he was as much to blame for the spending of the money
he was trusted and let them and us down

I will always like Malky and Respect him for what he achieved at Cardiff City

Your right no guarantee,but I believe he would of.

I second this, I also think he would have kept us up. It wouldn't have been pretty but I think he would have and despite the money spent we would be a lot better off financially with another year guaranteed in the riches of the prem. All if but and maybe. It's done now, we must move forward.

Not turning this into a malky thread
we all have our opinions

transfer fees are also spiraling out of control at almost doubling every season scary times for the relegated clubs

I think there are two ways of looking at it

Firstly on the face of it Malky spent £47m and only made £6m in transfers received - net spend £41m
Ole spent £21m but made £26m - net spend -£5m
Slade spent £1.2m but made £1.7m - net spend -£0.5m

Obviously this makes Malky look completely incompetent BUT

The players Malky spent £47m on have been sold for £30m and we still have T-C, Moore, Noone, Connolly, Turner, Mason, Gunnarsson and Harris who may have some value. Net spend £17m
The players Ole spent £21m on have recouped only £1m so far with Manga, Morrison, Le Fondre, Adeyemi, Fabio and Pilkington still around. Net spend £20m

To me this makes Malky look like a genius because he effectively got all that TV money in return for £17m where as Ole spent more and left us with the squad we currently have. Obviously won't know final amounts until there are no Malky or Ole players left.

I've taken all the values from transfermarkt website. It shows ? for the sales of Gestede, Conway and Taylor and the purchase of Healey so Malky's figures are probably slightly better than shown.

I agree when you look at those figures, but Malky was new and naive to the Premier League.
I will remember Malky for Runner way Champions and drawing with the Mighty Liverpool at Wembley, plus unite our fans behind his trojan players

No guarantees we would have stayed up under malky
and he was as much to blame for the spending of the money
he was trusted and let them and us down

I will always like Malky and Respect him for what he achieved at Cardiff City

Your right no guarantee,but I believe he would of.

I second this, I also think he would have kept us up. It wouldn't have been pretty but I think he would have and despite the money spent we would be a lot better off financially with another year guaranteed in the riches of the prem. All if but and maybe. It's done now, we must move forward.

Thats how I saw it. I honestly believe he would of

Not turning this into a malky thread
we all have our opinions

transfer fees are also spiraling out of control at almost doubling every season scary times for the relegated clubs

To be honest this was not a Malky thread, I was looking at what clubs spend to stay up in the so called promised land,which is shocking

Did not say you was
thought I was lol

Not turning this into a malky thread
we all have our opinions

transfer fees are also spiraling out of control at almost doubling every season scary times for the relegated clubs

To be honest this was not a Malky thread, I was looking at what clubs spend to stay up in the so called promised land,which is shocking

It's going to be worse this season with the new tv deal

" Money spent just in the last 2 transfers to stay in the Premier League "

QPR Spent £33 Mill Now Relegated
Burnley Spent £8.5 Mill Now Relegated
Hull City Spent £42.6 Mill At mom 3rd from Bottom.
Newcastle Spent £37.5 Mill At mom 4th from Bottom.
Sunderland Spent £14 Mill At mom 5th From Bottom
Leicester Spent £20.7 Mill At mom 6th from Bottom.
Aston Villa Spent £9.9 Mill At mom 7th from bottom looking safe

Many clubs spend unbelievable amounts to stay up,then when they are relegated virtually skint,parachute payments just about save them.

Between Malky and Ole, City spent about £65 million Bad business from the very top,no control of our finances.

have to agree malky was the worst Like a kid in a sweet shop ,I can't help feeling that Dave Jones would if done better with the money than all of them

Worse than ole starting the season with 10 strikers on the books?

" Money spent just in the last 2 transfers to stay in the Premier League "

QPR Spent £33 Mill Now Relegated
Burnley Spent £8.5 Mill Now Relegated
Hull City Spent £42.6 Mill At mom 3rd from Bottom.
Newcastle Spent £37.5 Mill At mom 4th from Bottom.
Sunderland Spent £14 Mill At mom 5th From Bottom
Leicester Spent £20.7 Mill At mom 6th from Bottom.
Aston Villa Spent £9.9 Mill At mom 7th from bottom looking safe

Many clubs spend unbelievable amounts to stay up,then when they are relegated virtually skint,parachute payments just about save them.

Between Malky and Ole, City spent about £65 million Bad business from the very top,no control of our finances.

have to agree malky was the worst Like a kid in a sweet shop ,I can't help feeling that Dave Jones would if done better with the money than all of them

Worse than ole starting the season with 10 strikers on the books?

Jack, Malky should be Knighted compared to Ole

Not turning this into a malky thread
we all have our opinions

transfer fees are also spiraling out of control at almost doubling every season scary times for the relegated clubs

To be honest this was not a Malky thread, I was looking at what clubs spend to stay up in the so called promised land,which is shocking

It's going to be worse this season with the new tv deal

Wez, Clubs will go further in to debt to get there next season.

Burnley done the right thing with Dyche, not giving him money as he can't be trusted to spend it. But, they are sticking with him & I predict Burnley will be strong next season as there squad won't have the upheaval. Le Fondre replacement for Ings is a good shout

" Money spent just in the last 2 transfers to stay in the Premier League "

QPR Spent £33 Mill Now Relegated
Burnley Spent £8.5 Mill Now Relegated
Hull City Spent £42.6 Mill At mom 3rd from Bottom.
Newcastle Spent £37.5 Mill At mom 4th from Bottom.
Sunderland Spent £14 Mill At mom 5th From Bottom
Leicester Spent £20.7 Mill At mom 6th from Bottom.
Aston Villa Spent £9.9 Mill At mom 7th from bottom looking safe

Many clubs spend unbelievable amounts to stay up,then when they are relegated virtually skint,parachute payments just about save them.

Between Malky and Ole, City spent about £65 million Bad business from the very top,no control of our finances.

have to agree malky was the worst Like a kid in a sweet shop ,I can't help feeling that Dave Jones would if done better with the money than all of them

Worse than ole starting the season with 10 strikers on the books?

Jack, Malky should be Knighted compared to Ole

Sorry to butt in here, but I realise sacking Malky wax probably inevitable, but had he stayed, I agree that he had the balls to keep the club up. His spending has been put under the microscope and yes, he did drop a changer with Cornelius. However, it is easy to forget th hat a new club with no recent top flight history will always struggle to attract top players. Even if you do get a star, you're more likely to pay over the odds and possibly forfeit any sell-ons.

That's the harsh reality of the top flight.

In fact, this season hasn't seen a huge implosion, but rather a managed trimming of the squad and wages.

If money wasn't owed to Tan, it would be looking quite rosy.

The big clubs will always pay more for the best players which stops other clubs becoming successful as they can't compete.Its not the size of your support these days its the size of your wallet.Its the same every season Clubs like Bornemouth,Burnley,Wigan,Hull etc. do well to get there but haven't the financial muscle to stay long term.

Malky asked for even more money in January despite the 'warchest' he was given in the summer, we had Arsenal, Man City and Man United away in January, do you really think we wouldn't have been in the relegation zone then?