Thu May 07, 2015 4:51 pm
Fri May 08, 2015 5:25 pm
Sat May 09, 2015 2:17 am
Sat May 09, 2015 6:13 am
krabb wrote:my number is put along side the number of the voting slip i am given.....so a cross reference can be made......apparently only a high court judge can ask for this to be referenced.....yerrrr o.k.....
Sat May 09, 2015 6:44 am
Sven wrote:40m+ voters and you think they 'cross-reference' every one of them?!?!![]()
![]()
That would be paranoia in the extreme!![]()
Sat May 09, 2015 6:48 am
powysblue wrote:krabb wrote:my number is put along side the number of the voting slip i am given.....so a cross reference can be made......apparently only a high court judge can ask for this to be referenced.....yerrrr o.k.....
Krabb, is that factually 100% true mate?
I always thought that as you went into the polling station, you were issued with an unmarked unnumbered voting paper after they checked off your name and number on their voter record sheet.
So, the actual paper that you put your cross on is untraceable ?
Blooobirds Forever !!!![]()
![]()
Sat May 09, 2015 7:06 am
krabb wrote:powysblue wrote:krabb wrote:my number is put along side the number of the voting slip i am given.....so a cross reference can be made......apparently only a high court judge can ask for this to be referenced.....yerrrr o.k.....
Krabb, is that factually 100% true mate?
I always thought that as you went into the polling station, you were issued with an unmarked unnumbered voting paper after they checked off your name and number on their voter record sheet.
So, the actual paper that you put your cross on is untraceable ?
Blooobirds Forever !!!![]()
![]()
when you go in you number off voting card is then put against a number that is on your voting slip......i was told this is in case of inproper voting then a high court judge can investigate.....100 % correct....
Sat May 09, 2015 8:12 am
Sat May 09, 2015 8:45 am
powysblue wrote:krabb wrote:powysblue wrote:krabb wrote:my number is put along side the number of the voting slip i am given.....so a cross reference can be made......apparently only a high court judge can ask for this to be referenced.....yerrrr o.k.....
Krabb, is that factually 100% true mate?
I always thought that as you went into the polling station, you were issued with an unmarked unnumbered voting paper after they checked off your name and number on their voter record sheet.
So, the actual paper that you put your cross on is untraceable ?
Blooobirds Forever !!!![]()
![]()
when you go in you number off voting card is then put against a number that is on your voting slip......i was told this is in case of inproper voting then a high court judge can investigate.....100 % correct....
Well that just makes a mockery of a secret ballot and if you think about what has happened in past recent history, is also quite frightening - could be used against you. Just look at what happened in Germany.
Blooobirds Foever !!!![]()
Sat May 09, 2015 8:47 am
Sat May 09, 2015 8:54 am
RFMH wrote:How did people not know that?![]()
If it was anonymous someone could just subtract a load of votes and add votes for party X.
Sat May 09, 2015 9:21 am
krabb wrote:RFMH wrote:How did people not know that?![]()
If it was anonymous someone could just subtract a load of votes and add votes for party X.
there should be no cross reference......had your voting slip in should be enough.....no need for a serial number on voting slip....not difficult is it
Sat May 09, 2015 9:28 am
Sat May 09, 2015 10:05 am
krabb wrote:Sven wrote:40m+ voters and you think they 'cross-reference' every one of them?!?!![]()
![]()
That would be paranoia in the extreme!![]()
not at all,but if you vote for a certain party then the authorities have the abillity to identify ......not hard is it...
Sat May 09, 2015 8:59 pm
Sun May 10, 2015 4:19 am
Griff wrote:Gower constituency was won by 27 votes, in the past there have been even tighter results. If it came to light that there had been 30 votes by people impersonating deceased electors (or others who did not vote) the only way to find out if the election result was affected would be to obtain a court order during the next year to open up the container holding the tens of thousands of votes and find the voting slips used for those 30 votes. That would be a lot of work but it would allow a court to decide if the result should be changed. This can only be achieved because the poll clerks write the voting register number on the voting slip.
As a society we have a choice as our local and national elections can be:
(1) 100% anonymous - in which case it is not possible to tell if any fraud had an impact on the result; OR
(2) legally protected anonymous - so that only a court order (exceedingly rare and always in public) can authorise the investigation of suspected fraud.
We cannot have both, we have to select one. On balance I much prefer the second option.
Mon May 11, 2015 10:07 pm