Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:40 pm

Dropped...responsible for goals against Reading and Bolton. Cannot defend to save his life, he is a liability and should be got rid of. Those who say he should play on the wing don't understand why he looks good going forward, when going forward from the back he comes into contact with opposition midfield players who cannot dive in, If he starts the game further forward he has to deal with full backs who are there to defend and usually have back up if they fail. The bottom line is he is a full back that cannot defend!

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:54 pm

If Fabio was responsible so we're Noone and Whitts who offered zero protection and both are playing today. Slade scapegoats Fabio and doesn't address more serious problems in the squad.

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:58 pm

RFMH wrote:If Fabio was responsible so we're Noone and Whitts who offered zero protection and both are playing today. Slade scapegoats Fabio and doesn't address more serious problems in the squad.

It's fab ios job to defend and he can't do it. The two games I mentioned are the latest ones, there has been many more. He is crap

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 2:25 pm

Roy wrote:Dropped...responsible for goals against Reading and Bolton. Cannot defend to save his life, he is a liability and should be got rid of. Those who say he should play on the wing don't understand why he looks good going forward, when going forward from the back he comes into contact with opposition midfield players who cannot dive in, If he starts the game further forward he has to deal with full backs who are there to defend and usually have back up if they fail. The bottom line is he is a full back that cannot defend!


I really like fabio but anyone with half a football brain will know u r not wrong. Peltier is solid and slades done the right thing

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 2:39 pm

Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:If Fabio was responsible so we're Noone and Whitts who offered zero protection and both are playing today. Slade scapegoats Fabio and doesn't address more serious problems in the squad.

It's fab ios job to defend and he can't do it. The two games I mentioned are the latest ones, there has been many more. He is crap


You can always tell a bad football fan by how little they see the game. Blame goals conceded on the last few seconds of it.

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:02 pm

Roy wrote:Dropped...responsible for goals against Reading and Bolton. Cannot defend to save his life, he is a liability and should be got rid of. Those who say he should play on the wing don't understand why he looks good going forward, when going forward from the back he comes into contact with opposition midfield players who cannot dive in, If he starts the game further forward he has to deal with full backs who are there to defend and usually have back up if they fail. The bottom line is he is a full back that cannot defend!


Agree 100%

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:05 pm

RFMH wrote:
Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:If Fabio was responsible so we're Noone and Whitts who offered zero protection and both are playing today. Slade scapegoats Fabio and doesn't address more serious problems in the squad.

It's fab ios job to defend and he can't do it. The two games I mentioned are the latest ones, there has bei en many more. He is crap


You can always tell a bad football fan by how little they see the game. Blame goals conceded on the last few seconds of it.

I was most probably watching the city when you was in nappies. Fabio is a full back and cannot defend end of.

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:25 pm

Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:
Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:If Fabio was responsible so we're Noone and Whitts who offered zero protection and both are playing today. Slade scapegoats Fabio and doesn't address more serious problems in the squad.

It's fab ios job to defend and he can't do it. The two games I mentioned are the latest ones, there has bei en many more. He is crap


You can always tell a bad football fan by how little they see the game. Blame goals conceded on the last few seconds of it.

I was most probably watching the city when you was in nappies. Fabio is a full back and cannot defend end of.



He is an attacking fullback! But either he can't defend properly or he doesn't suit city's style of play? Last 2 games are not only times he's gone missing at the back! Can blame players ahead of him but its his responsibility to manage that?

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:35 pm

He can defend, but is not a defender. He needs to go to a club that play modern football.

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:47 pm

llan bluebird wrote:He can defend, but is not a defender. He needs to go to a club that play modern football.


:oops: Bottom line is that he is a crap defender!

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:11 pm

Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:
Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:If Fabio was responsible so we're Noone and Whitts who offered zero protection and both are playing today. Slade scapegoats Fabio and doesn't address more serious problems in the squad.

It's fab ios job to defend and he can't do it. The two games I mentioned are the latest ones, there has bei en many more. He is crap


You can always tell a bad football fan by how little they see the game. Blame goals conceded on the last few seconds of it.

I was most probably watching the city when you was in nappies. Fabio is a full back and cannot defend end of.


End of and you keep replying. Sad.

You might have watched football for a long time but your knowledge is sparsely enough to cover a biscuit.

Yes Fabio has defensive frailties but the situations he ended up in were at the faults of others. That's obvious.

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:39 pm

RFMH wrote:
Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:
Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:If Fabio was responsible so we're Noone and Whitts who offered zero protection and both are playing today. Slade scapegoats Fabio and doesn't address more serious problems in the squad.

It's fab ios job to defend and he can't do it. The two games I mentioned are the latest ones, there has bei en many more. He is crap


You can always tell a bad football fan by how little they see the game. Blame goals conceded on the last few seconds of it.

I was most probably watching the city when you was in nappies. Fabio is a full back and cannot defend end of.


End of and you keep replying. Sad.

You might have watched football for a long time but your knowledge is sparsely enough to cover a biscuit.

Yes Fabio has defensive frailties but the situations he ended up in were at the faults of others. That's obvious.

Watched and played it but if you think it's the fault of others then your biscuit is much smaller than mine

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:02 pm

Just no. End of and still replies, so not end of :laughing5: :laughing5: pathetic.

Football is a team game and most goals aren't down to just individual errors. If you don't think that then give up.

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:16 pm

RFMH wrote:Just no. End of and still replies, so not end of :laughing5: :laughing5: pathetic.

Football is a team game and most goals aren't down to just individual errors. If you don't think that then give up.

We will have to differ on this subject, I cannot waste no more time conversing with an idiot

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:26 pm

Roy wrote:
RFMH wrote:Just no. End of and still replies, so not end of :laughing5: :laughing5: pathetic.

Football is a team game and most goals aren't down to just individual errors. If you don't think that then give up.

We will have to differ on this subject, I cannot waste no more time conversing with an idiot


We'll agree you were wrong then, Mr end of, then replies again and again :laughing6:

Re: Glad to see Fabio

Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:50 pm

Roy wrote:Dropped...responsible for goals against Reading and Bolton. Cannot defend to save his life, he is a liability and should be got rid of. Those who say he should play on the wing don't understand why he looks good going forward, when going forward from the back he comes into contact with opposition midfield players who cannot dive in, If he starts the game further forward he has to deal with full backs who are there to defend and usually have back up if they fail. The bottom line is he is a full back that cannot defend!

You, sir, know what you're talking about!