" THE CIRCUS IS LINING UP FOR THE MAIN EVENT "

CARDIFF CITY Vs LANGSTON COURT CASE viewtopic.php?f=2&t=157035

The circus is lining up for its main event but like many top bills to headline I think those who are watching in anticipation for something dramatic to take place may be left disappointed, as I would not be surprised to see this settled outside of a court just days before.

Good to see your back in the know

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

The statement says both tan and club sued but tan is the garauntour so as liability for debt?

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

The statement says both tan and club sued but tan is the garauntour so as liability for debt?

Allan, Tan personally signed the new agreement etc

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

The statement says both tan and club sued but tan is the garauntour so as liability for debt?

Allan, Tan personally signed the new agreement etc

Maybe so Annis but statement clearly says its against club and tan! but like you said tan is responsible for debt
Just makes you wonder why he's taking Langston to court if its cut and dried case against tan?

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

The statement says both tan and club sued but tan is the garauntour so as liability for debt?

Allan, Tan personally signed the new agreement etc

Maybe so Annis but statement clearly says its against club and tan! but like you said tan is responsible for debt
Just makes you wonder why he's taking Langston to court if its cut and dried case against tan?

Allan, Rem I said this,it will be settled outside court

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

The statement says both tan and club sued but tan is the garauntour so as liability for debt?

Allan, Tan personally signed the new agreement etc

Maybe so Annis but statement clearly says its against club and tan! but like you said tan is responsible for debt
Just makes you wonder why he's taking Langston to court if its cut and dried case against tan?

Allan, Rem I said this,it will be settled outside court

ITK Annis!

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

The statement says both tan and club sued but tan is the garauntour so as liability for debt?

Allan, Tan personally signed the new agreement etc

Maybe so Annis but statement clearly says its against club and tan! but like you said tan is responsible for debt
Just makes you wonder why he's taking Langston to court if its cut and dried case against tan?

Allan, Rem I said this,it will be settled outside court

ITK Annis!

Honestly Allan, rem I said it

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

The statement says both tan and club sued but tan is the garauntour so as liability for debt?

Allan, Tan personally signed the new agreement etc

Maybe so Annis but statement clearly says its against club and tan! but like you said tan is responsible for debt
Just makes you wonder why he's taking Langston to court if its cut and dried case against tan?

Allan, Rem I said this,it will be settled outside court

ITK Annis!

Honestly Allan, rem I said it

I'm sure you will remind me Annis!

Yes annis you did say it
BUT Carl said it first

Yes annis you did say it
BUT Carl said it first

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -fees.html
Hmmmm ?

Carl,

If everyone reads the case correctly,Sam/Langston are only taking Tan to court and say there is no need to get the club involved as it's a Tan that's being sued for going back on his agreement

The statement says both tan and club sued but tan is the garauntour so as liability for debt?

Allan, Tan personally signed the new agreement etc

Maybe so Annis but statement clearly says its against club and tan! but like you said tan is responsible for debt
Just makes you wonder why he's taking Langston to court if its cut and dried case against tan?

Allan, Rem I said this,it will be settled outside court

Wasn't that also said about the case with Malky vs the club or Tan?