Tue Mar 24, 2015 12:03 pm
Tue Mar 24, 2015 12:31 pm
Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:19 pm
SWilliams wrote:But if it had not been for Slade we wouldn't have either Doyle or Kennedy. Can't have it both ways.
Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:56 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:SWilliams wrote:But if it had not been for Slade we wouldn't have either Doyle or Kennedy. Can't have it both ways.
Exactly, Slade's signings helped win us the game, but we still won in spite of Slade apparently!
Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:34 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:SWilliams wrote:But if it had not been for Slade we wouldn't have either Doyle or Kennedy. Can't have it both ways.
Exactly, Slade's signings helped win us the game, but we still won in spite of Slade apparently!
The changes he was forced into.
Doyle started the game as 4th choice ffs as for Kennedy the fact he was even on the bench is strange.
Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:24 pm
Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:37 pm
Overthemoon wrote:When we win it's because we were up against a poor team and in spite of Slade!
When we lose it's also down to Slade!
Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:54 pm
maccydee wrote:Overthemoon wrote:When we win it's because we were up against a poor team and in spite of Slade!
When we lose it's also down to Slade!
Or tan has picked the team when we lose.
Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:21 pm
angelis1949 wrote:I maintain we beat Birmingham despite Slade,remember the two players, arguably who change the game around,Doyle and Kennedy were not in Slade's original selection, and I'm sure would not have played such a significant role in the game.
Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:38 pm
Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:15 pm
KBK-13 wrote:I'm not a fan of Slade but he signed both of the players that changed the game.
Still, don't let that stop you moaning