Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 12:03 pm

I maintain we beat Birmingham despite Slade,remember the two players, arguably who change the game around,Doyle and Kennedy were not in Slade's original selection, and I'm sure would not have played such a significant role in the game.

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 12:31 pm

But if it had not been for Slade we wouldn't have either Doyle or Kennedy. Can't have it both ways.

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:19 pm

SWilliams wrote:But if it had not been for Slade we wouldn't have either Doyle or Kennedy. Can't have it both ways.


Exactly, Slade's signings helped win us the game, but we still won in spite of Slade apparently! :lol:

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:56 pm

Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
SWilliams wrote:But if it had not been for Slade we wouldn't have either Doyle or Kennedy. Can't have it both ways.


Exactly, Slade's signings helped win us the game, but we still won in spite of Slade apparently! :lol:


The changes he was forced into.
Doyle started the game as 4th choice ffs as for Kennedy the fact he was even on the bench is strange.

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:34 pm

2blue2handle wrote:
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
SWilliams wrote:But if it had not been for Slade we wouldn't have either Doyle or Kennedy. Can't have it both ways.


Exactly, Slade's signings helped win us the game, but we still won in spite of Slade apparently! :lol:


The changes he was forced into.
Doyle started the game as 4th choice ffs as for Kennedy the fact he was even on the bench is strange.




And it's also a question of "How far can he (Slade) take us?" :?

No too far IMHO :(

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:24 pm

When we win it's because we were up against a poor team and in spite of Slade!

When we lose it's also down to Slade! :laughing5:

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:37 pm

Overthemoon wrote:When we win it's because we were up against a poor team and in spite of Slade!

When we lose it's also down to Slade! :laughing5:


Or tan has picked the team when we lose.

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:54 pm

maccydee wrote:
Overthemoon wrote:When we win it's because we were up against a poor team and in spite of Slade!

When we lose it's also down to Slade! :laughing5:


Or tan has picked the team when we lose.

Forgot about him! :)

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:21 pm

angelis1949 wrote:I maintain we beat Birmingham despite Slade,remember the two players, arguably who change the game around,Doyle and Kennedy were not in Slade's original selection, and I'm sure would not have played such a significant role in the game.



But he signed them both

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:38 pm

I'm not a fan of Slade but he signed both of the players that changed the game.

Still, don't let that stop you moaning

Re: Slade

Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:15 pm

KBK-13 wrote:I'm not a fan of Slade but he signed both of the players that changed the game.

Still, don't let that stop you moaning


Why don't people get it, it not that he signed them it's that he was forced into playing them. Consistently showing his inability to manage.
Doyle was no where near getting on before two injuries, he bought him and won't play him.

Kennedy dropped for no reason and on due to injury.