Steve Tucker

How is this man employed? Does he understand football? Does he actually attend the matches? If the latter question is yes, that's even worse. His ratings are bizarre. Revell a 6? He ran his socks off and for that alone he deserves more. Witts was also more than a 6. After all he yet again gave the scoring assist. And gunner continues to give his all and is with more than a 6. Tucker is dreadful.

He is a shit journalist, always has been

The guy (Tucker) has no interest in anything other than himself and his self-indulgent alter-ego!

Somewhere out there is a village currently missing its idiot and so far they appear reluctant to reclaim him!

Can see why TBH and whilst it doesn't help us, I can understand why they don't want him back!

How is this man employed? Does he understand football? Does he actually attend the matches? If the latter question is yes, that's even worse. His ratings are bizarre. Revell a 6? He ran his socks off and for that alone he deserves more. Witts was also more than a 6. After all he yet again gave the scoring assist. And gunner continues to give his all and is with more than a 6. Tucker is dreadful.

Agree about Revell but I couldnt understand how Whittingham got as high as a 6! The corner swung Tucker I suppose. Gunnar should have been 8

Haven't seen the ratings but I would have given
Moore 5
Connolly 7
Manga 8
Morrison 6
Fabio 8
Whiitingham 7
Gunnarsson 7
Noone 6
Kennedy 5
Jones 4
Revell 7

I'm no huge fan of Steve Tucker, but he's better than having a Swansea Jack, (Chris Wathan), or an egg-chaser, (Delme Parfitt), reporting on us. Terry Phillips is the best of the Western Mail and Echo writers, who covers our games.

Tucks clearly as clueless as Slade on anything football.