Doyle must start! and with...

Macheda for me at the moment, either doyle and macheda or doyle and mcaleny.

Doyle must start imo because he gives hard work and good movement up front and i believe will get goals too, he also offers a bit of a physical presence and can battle against defenders.

I dont buy the lump it to kenwynne shite football and kenwynne is just a carthorse lump of striker up front, we could get george north or jamie roberts to play up front to do the same job as kenwynne does but i would rather a striker up front who moves and is a good finisher.
Im adding macheda in to it because he is a good finisher and could link well with doyle given the chance. Kenwynne and macheda are too strikers who dont give a lot of running and energy and this wont benefit the team overall and the likes of mcaleny and noone looking to join in setting up attacks from the wings.. opinions..

I think you mean Two strikers.

Macheda for me at the moment, either doyle and macheda or doyle and mcaleny.

Doyle must start imo because he gives hard work and good movement up front and i believe will get goals too, he also offers a bit of a physical presence and can battle against defenders.

I dont buy the lump it to kenwynne shite football and kenwynne is just a carthorse lump of striker up front, we could get george north or jamie roberts to play up front to do the same job as kenwynne does but i would rather a striker up front who moves and is a good finisher.
Im adding macheda in to it because he is a good finisher and could link well with doyle given the chance. Kenwynne and macheda are too strikers who dont give a lot of running and energy and this wont benefit the team overall and the likes of mcaleny and noone looking to join in setting up attacks from the wings.. opinions..

We haven't lumped it to Kenwyn since Trollope arrived, maybe last ten when it's needs must. Did you go to the game yesterday?

Macheda for me at the moment, either doyle and macheda or doyle and mcaleny.

Doyle must start imo because he gives hard work and good movement up front and i believe will get goals too, he also offers a bit of a physical presence and can battle against defenders.

I dont buy the lump it to kenwynne shite football and kenwynne is just a carthorse lump of striker up front, we could get george north or jamie roberts to play up front to do the same job as kenwynne does but i would rather a striker up front who moves and is a good finisher.
Im adding macheda in to it because he is a good finisher and could link well with doyle given the chance. Kenwynne and macheda are too strikers who dont give a lot of running and energy and this wont benefit the team overall and the likes of mcaleny and noone looking to join in setting up attacks from the wings.. opinions..

I wrote this on a previous post in week after Rotherham game i think macheda has good touch to slip ball through to Doyle. Although yesterday he wasn't brilliant but did score

Macheda for me at the moment, either doyle and macheda or doyle and mcaleny.

Doyle must start imo because he gives hard work and good movement up front and i believe will get goals too, he also offers a bit of a physical presence and can battle against defenders.

I dont buy the lump it to kenwynne shite football and kenwynne is just a carthorse lump of striker up front, we could get george north or jamie roberts to play up front to do the same job as kenwynne does but i would rather a striker up front who moves and is a good finisher.
Im adding macheda in to it because he is a good finisher and could link well with doyle given the chance. Kenwynne and macheda are too strikers who dont give a lot of running and energy and this wont benefit the team overall and the likes of mcaleny and noone looking to join in setting up attacks from the wings.. opinions..

We haven't lumped it to Kenwyn since Trollope arrived, maybe last ten when it's needs must. Did you go to the game yesterday?

No i couldnt go to yesterdays game. What im getting at is he is far too lazy for my liking and i would rather a team playing with movement up front and not a target man.. apart from being a target man holding the ball up and laying it off and winning a few headers he isnt good for anything else and thats just not good enough for me

I think you mean Two strikers.

Yeh thats what i meant to say ha