Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:07 am

Who will win this now it's official ?

3/4 years ago I would have bet pacquiao now I'm not sure !

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:52 am

For me, this fight is 5-6years to late. They should have got it on straight after they both beat hatton, when they were both at their best. The fight will be one sided with maywaether keeping at arms length and picking pacman off, unanimous points decision to mayweather. If this fight was 5years ago, my money would have been on pacman. For whatever reason, he was a f*cking machine back then, his work rate and aggression was out of this world, and wouldve got the judges vote, as good as mayweathers defence was and still is, IMO the judges would have gone for Manny on a point decision. I don't think he's anywhere near the fighter he was, but mayweather is still the defensive counter attacking master he always has been and that's why I think he will win comfortably. Mayweather has picked the right time to fight him. That's just my opinion though

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:10 am

MoneyMay all the way..

Look at what Juanma Did with Manny on their series of fights, then look what Floyd did with Juanma.


Like Manny,but Floyds a whole different kettle of fish..

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 6:37 am

Always Floyd. Different class.

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 9:39 am

Two fighters past their prime getting one last enormous pay day. Would have been much more appealing 7 or 8 years ago.

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 1:30 pm

Hope Pacquiao batters him.

Mayweather is horrible, rich, greedy bellend. Friends with Bieber ffs!.

Pacquaio looks to save lives in the phillipines and floyd minces about wasting money in front of millions of poor people.

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 1:52 pm

Depressed Blue wrote:Pacquaio looks to save lives in the phillipines and floyd minces about wasting money in front of millions of poor people.

What does FMJ waste money on? If you're on about cars, parties, etc. then you don't seem to understand how economics works.

:lol:

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 1:54 pm

I'm talking about greed And gluttony.

I understand perfectly that he has 'earned' his money.

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 1:57 pm

mr'mogreenz wrote:For me, this fight is 5-6years to late. They should have got it on straight after they both beat hatton, when they were both at their best. The fight will be one sided with maywaether keeping at arms length and picking pacman off, unanimous points decision to mayweather. If this fight was 5years ago, my money would have been on pacman. For whatever reason, he was a f*cking machine back then, his work rate and aggression was out of this world, and wouldve got the judges vote, as good as mayweathers defence was and still is, IMO the judges would have gone for Manny on a point decision. I don't think he's anywhere near the fighter he was, but mayweather is still the defensive counter attacking master he always has been and that's why I think he will win comfortably. Mayweather has picked the right time to fight him. That's just my opinion though


Unfortunately I agree as would love to see pacquio win but he seems to have lost the seek and destroy attitude he had in his prime. I can't remember the last time he had a stoppage and on many occasions recently seems to be carrying his opponent through the twelve rounds when if he put his foot down he could stop him.

Still probably think pacquio would be better at light welter or lightweight as well. Mayweather by decision again I feel!!

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:03 pm

Depressed Blue wrote:I'm talking about greed And gluttony.

I understand perfectly that he has 'earned' his money.


In what sense is he greedy? You don't make sense. He gives to charity and he helps train a lot of youngsters and get them off the street. All the cars need cleaners, properties he buys need gardeners, cleaners - etc. puts people in jobs and the money he spends goes back into the system whilst the VAT on his purchases will also. It would be far worse if he just sat on all of that money like others do rather than circulating it through spending. The media has done a good job on you portraying him in this way. You should watch the more balanced documentaries of him. You come across very bitter to be honest.

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:17 pm

Hahaha bitter. Do me a favour.

He openly spends money on prositutes. Throws around money as if its worthless. I would link a video of him in a penthouse in vegas with about 30 prozzys.

He is hedonistic douche bag that associates himself with another bellend in bieber. But what ever makes him feel good inside. Buying some watches and a few pointless cars.

Personally, I dont care about money. Couldnt care less about it.

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:25 pm

Depressed Blue wrote:Hahaha bitter. Do me a favour.

He openly spends money on prositutes. Throws around money as if its worthless. I would link a video of him in a penthouse in vegas with about 30 prozzys.

He is hedonistic douche bag that associates himself with another bellend in bieber. But what ever makes him feel good inside. Buying some watches and a few pointless cars.

Personally, I dont care about money. Couldnt care less about it.

Jealous :wave: :wave: :wave:

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:34 pm

There are many other rich people that I am jealous of.

Mayweather really is not one of them.

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:37 pm

Image

No thanks.

Re: Mayweather v pacquiao. . Fight officially on

Sun Feb 22, 2015 12:26 am

No point saying "oh they should've faught 5 years ago.. Both peak then.... " because they didn't fight. So no point dreaming of what could've been.

It's all ifs and buts!!!

Had ODH been five years younger when he faced Manny or Floyd the results would've been different..

But he wasn't.