Not good enough for Russell Slade

Ravel Morrison today had his medical at Italian Giants Lazio
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=150707

Good luck to him

the issue was not whether he was good enough. it was whether he has the attitude to succeed, and whether he fits in with the formation and tactics.

slade thought he was more trouble than he's worth, the same as managers like allardyce and ferguson before him. he's not alone in holding that view, in other words.

the issue was not whether he was good enough. it was whether he has the attitude to succeed, and whether he fits in with the formation and tactics.

slade thought he was more trouble than he's worth, the same as managers like allardyce and ferguson before him. he's not alone in holding that view, in other words.

But we signed him while on trial,yet gave him back once found not guilty?
Also are you saying that all the players that are quality,our club cant handle because their trouble Guerra,Cala,Daehli etc etc ?

the issue was not whether he was good enough. it was whether he has the attitude to succeed, and whether he fits in with the formation and tactics.

slade thought he was more trouble than he's worth, the same as managers like allardyce and ferguson before him. he's not alone in holding that view, in other words.

But we signed him while on trial,yet gave him back once found not guilty?
Also are you saying that all the players that are quality,our club cant handle because their trouble Guerra,Cala,Daehli etc etc ?

he's shown he is trouble throughout his career, and that stands whether he was found guilty or not of this particular offence, thats why his career hasn't progressed like a player possessing that talent should.

on your second point, no i'm am not saying that, otherwise i would have said it in my post. i suspect cost cutting and players not fitting into tactics would be the reasons slade would cite behind their departures.

Couldn't afford his wages anyway, so it's a non story really

Couldn't afford his wages anyway, so it's a non story really

City were only paying 40% of them.

the issue was not whether he was good enough. it was whether he has the attitude to succeed, and whether he fits in with the formation and tactics.

slade thought he was more trouble than he's worth, the same as managers like allardyce and ferguson before him. he's not alone in holding that view, in other words.

But we signed him while on trial,yet gave him back once found not guilty?
Also are you saying that all the players that are quality,our club cant handle because their trouble Guerra,Cala,Daehli etc etc ?

he's shown he is trouble throughout his career, and that stands whether he was found guilty or not of this particular offence, thats why his career hasn't progressed like a player possessing that talent should.

on your second point, no i'm am not saying that, otherwise i would have said it in my post. i suspect cost cutting and players not fitting into tactics would be the reasons slade would cite behind their departures.

The truth is,that Slade cant handle quality players. Plus of course on some players,Tan tells him who he can keep or get rid of,like a puppet on a string.

Good luck to him

Slade never gave him a chance, just like with Mats Daehli.

Exactly why I don't believe the Matt Jarvis rumour. He'd be a great player for us, but for some reason Slade always gets rid of the player with creativity?

Good luck to him

Slade never gave him a chance, just like with Mats Daehli.

Exactly why I don't believe the Matt Jarvis rumour. He'd be a great player for us, but for some reason Slade always gets rid of the player with creativity?

Ned, I agree I never believed the bullshit Matt Jarvis rumour either

Good luck to him

Slade never gave him a chance, just like with Mats Daehli.

Exactly why I don't believe the Matt Jarvis rumour. He'd be a great player for us, but for some reason Slade always gets rid of the player with creativity?

Ned, I agree I never believed the bullshit Matt Jarvis rumour either

Couldn't have put it better

See you on Saturday for another Russell Slade masterclass

Ravel Morrison is a liability. No doubting his talent but i'm glad we're shot of him & the circus he brings.

so we were only paying 40% of his wages
maybe that's why he didn't give 100%
in fact he didn't give 40% either
another big time Charlie going to waste his talent
sorry annis this stick to hit slade with is whats called hitting below the belt
shame you posted this as we been agreeing lately
but cant agree this time

the issue was not whether he was good enough. it was whether he has the attitude to succeed, and whether he fits in with the formation and tactics

Formation and tactics???? have we got either

can't blame Slade for this one...No manager he has ever worked under has been able to control him.

He will be bombed out of this new club within 6 months...waste of talent and a waste of space

Ravel Morrison is a liability. No doubting his talent but i'm glad we're shot of him & the circus he brings.

Couldn't agree more. He's also a massively overrated footballer who you can never trust to consistently perform. Not good enough for us and I don't know what Lazio are thinking. They will soon be realising their mistake and try offloading him next summer. Ravel Morrison will achieve absolutely nothing in football. He lacks so many things necessary to make it as a decent footballer. Attitude, professionalism, character, determination and work ethic being some of them.

the issue was not whether he was good enough. it was whether he has the attitude to succeed, and whether he fits in with the formation and tactics.

slade thought he was more trouble than he's worth, the same as managers like allardyce and ferguson before him. he's not alone in holding that view, in other words.

But we signed him while on trial,yet gave him back once found not guilty?
Also are you saying that all the players that are quality,our club cant handle because their trouble Guerra,Cala,Daehli etc etc ?

he's shown he is trouble throughout his career, and that stands whether he was found guilty or not of this particular offence, thats why his career hasn't progressed like a player possessing that talent should.

on your second point, no i'm am not saying that, otherwise i would have said it in my post. i suspect cost cutting and players not fitting into tactics would be the reasons slade would cite behind their departures.

The truth is,that Slade cant handle quality players. Plus of course on some players,Tan tells him who he can keep or get rid of,like a puppet on a string.

So managers at ncastle, liverpool, swansea, sunderland , west brom , man city have all been puppets? Because everyone of these clubs owners have say in player policy to some degree!! I remember certain someone being called a puppet of our previous owner?

West Ham midfielder Ravel Morrison has agreed a four-year pre-contract with Lazio.

so we were only paying 40% of his wages
maybe that's why he didn't give 100%
in fact he didn't give 40% either
another big time Charlie going to waste his talent
sorry annis this stick to hit slade with is whats called hitting below the belt
shame you posted this as we been agreeing lately
but cant agree this time

His reputation is irrelevent, he wouldn't have played him anyway

so we were only paying 40% of his wages
maybe that's why he didn't give 100%
in fact he didn't give 40% either
another big time Charlie going to waste his talent
sorry annis this stick to hit slade with is whats called hitting below the belt
shame you posted this as we been agreeing lately
but cant agree this time

His reputation is irrelevent, he wouldn't have played him anyway

Thats the truth.