Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:09 pm
Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:18 pm
Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:25 pm
davids wrote:I know it's on a smaller scale but last week the son of a friend stood to win almost £4000 on an accumultor but was let down by one result.....he bet on cardiff to beat Norwich!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Serves him right to be honest.
Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:34 pm
Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:35 pm
bluebird_1995 wrote:davids wrote:I know it's on a smaller scale but last week the son of a friend stood to win almost £4000 on an accumultor but was let down by one result.....he bet on cardiff to beat Norwich!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Serves him right to be honest.
Rule No. 1 of any accumulator never bet on your own team or Cardiff City!! Helps if they are the same![]()
Sat Jan 24, 2015 7:43 pm
Sat Jan 24, 2015 8:23 pm
JAWS wrote:1/100
so he would have won £10 for every £1000 bet,that's £440 he would've won if Chelsea went on to win for a stake of £44,000.Absolute stupid bet and deserved to lose.
Sat Jan 24, 2015 8:24 pm
JAWS wrote:1/100
so he would have won £10 for every £1000 bet,that's £440 he would've won if Chelsea went on to win for a stake of £44,000.Absolute stupid bet and deserved to lose.
Sat Jan 24, 2015 8:55 pm
carlccfc wrote:Listening to Talksport in the car on my way home after the game had finished and a bookie was talking about the shocks in the cup today.
He said at half time in the Chelsea v Bradford, the Bantams were 450/1 to go on and win after being 2-0 down.
He then said that Chelsea were 1/100 at 2-0 and someone put £44,000 on them at those odds, I bet someone is absolutely tamping tonight![]()
So we may be down after losing to Reading but think of that guy who lost £44k
Sat Jan 24, 2015 8:57 pm
maccydee wrote:JAWS wrote:1/100
so he would have won £10 for every £1000 bet,that's £440 he would've won if Chelsea went on to win for a stake of £44,000.Absolute stupid bet and deserved to lose.
Better interest than a bank.
Sat Jan 24, 2015 9:17 pm
nubbsy wrote:maccydee wrote:JAWS wrote:1/100
so he would have won £10 for every £1000 bet,that's £440 he would've won if Chelsea went on to win for a stake of £44,000.Absolute stupid bet and deserved to lose.
Better interest than a bank.
Well no mate, it wasn't was it because he lost.
Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:59 pm
Sun Jan 25, 2015 1:49 am
llangainbluebird wrote:You'll never beat the bookies!
Sun Jan 25, 2015 2:03 am
carlccfc wrote:Listening to Talksport in the car on my way home after the game had finished and a bookie was talking about the shocks in the cup today.
He said at half time in the Chelsea v Bradford, the Bantams were 450/1 to go on and win after being 2-0 down.
He then said that Chelsea were 1/100 at 2-0 and someone put £44,000 on them at those odds, I bet someone is absolutely tamping tonight![]()
So we may be down after losing to Reading but think of that guy who lost £44k