Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:22 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:51 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:53 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:01 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:19 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:25 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:43 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:48 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:48 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:51 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:51 pm
ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:56 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:04 pm
ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:06 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:07 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
Normally agree with a lot of your posts but this comes across as a bitter jealousy.
Unfortunately, the jack bastards are light years ahead of our circus from top to bottom.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:09 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:16 pm
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:17 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:18 pm
6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's the administration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:19 pm
6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's the administration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:21 pm
waddle wrote:6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's the administration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
To be fair I think most of them know the score now , a bit sad really seeing all the fight knocked out of them
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:22 pm
waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be payed back
What a tit !
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:23 pm
6 bysedd wrote:waddle wrote:6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's the administration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
To be fair I think most of them know the score now , a bit sad really seeing all the fight knocked out of them
Which is why I never come on here nowadays.There's no banter or competition just a messageboard full of empty souls.Quite sad really.
f**k off then.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:24 pm
6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's second half,ministration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:24 pm
Gaffer wrote:6 bysedd wrote:waddle wrote:6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's the administration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
To be fair I think most of them know the score now , a bit sad really seeing all the fight knocked out of them
Which is why I never come on here nowadays.There's no banter or competition just a messageboard full of empty souls.Quite sad really.
f**k off then.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:25 pm
6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's second half,ministration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:25 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be payed back
What a tit !
How is that the same? We made an offer and Hammam accepted. He could have declined and insisted we paid the full amount back. A big difference to what you did, but full credit to Huw Jenkins who has done an incredible job since and makes a mockery of our current owner.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:26 pm
waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be payed back
What a tit !
How is that the same? We made an offer and Hammam accepted. He could have declined and insisted we paid the full amount back. A big difference to what you did, but full credit to Huw Jenkins who has done an incredible job since and makes a mockery of our current owner.
which is exactly the same as happened to us , they didn't have to accept but came to an agreement
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:26 pm
6 bysedd wrote:waddle wrote:6 bysedd wrote:I thought it would be the attendances rolled out but no it's the administration line tonight.Your club owes a hundred times the amount we owed back then and have since paid back.I'm not on here gloating and didn't start the thread just commented on a great win for us.In Montero we have a superstar and Arsenals fullback Callum Chambers will do well to recover from the rinsing he took today.Just saying.
To be fair I think most of them know the score now , a bit sad really seeing all the fight knocked out of them
Which is why I never come on here nowadays.There's no banter or competition just a messageboard full of empty souls.Quite sad really.
Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:28 pm
Gaffer wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:waddle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:ffs wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Since cheating with administration twice, they've done very well. But they're only where they are now because they cheated. What would you choose out of taking the cheap way out like the Jacks to get to where they are now, or go down our path of trying to do things the right way, only to have Vincent Tan rip our club to shreds?
We 'cheated' as well. Didn't we owe Hammam £30m+ and ended up paying him around a third of that?
No, we did a deal with Hammam which is why he's now the life president of our club.
So you did exactly the same as us , you owed someone x amount couldn't pay it so came to an agreement over what would be payed back
What a tit !
How is that the same? We made an offer and Hammam accepted. He could have declined and insisted we paid the full amount back. A big difference to what you did, but full credit to Huw Jenkins who has done an incredible job since and makes a mockery of our current owner.
which is exactly the same as happened to us , they didn't have to accept but came to an agreement
The difference is your creditors didn't have a choice in the matter.