This worries me about Cardiff City

As we all know, it was revealed that a member of this forum was giving us all information about the club through a different name. We all welcomed the information, and nobody seemed to be complaining at the time.

Steve Borley responded by saying staff at the club were "under suspicion" and that this was "unfair".

For me that is hugely worrying.

It highlights the lack of trust in the club. I can't imagine having to work in those circumstances.

It seems, going by those tweets, that the club can not trust the people who work for them. That must be hugely difficult for the people who work there.

You have to ask, how many other times are they under suspicion?

Of course, this is just my opinion and no factual evidence. Just pointing out that this is something that worries me.

Surely the club should be more concrened by the fact that the information is getting out regardless?
The fact that the name of the person who was revealing it was called staff is irellevant.

Or it's just common in any kind of job? You post under an anonymous name lets say, write a post on a page about work colleagues/what's going on in the business then people get curious? Shows this forum is full of vultures and leeches

Or it's just common in any kind of job? You post under an anonymous name lets say, write a post on a page about work colleagues/what's going on in the business then people get curious? Shows this forum is full of vultures and leeches

Look at the stories,You have tried to make up about me and then when you were totally wrong every time, youve then said, it wasnt me I read it some where but Ive let it go every time. At least Carl doesnt make it up

Or it's just common in any kind of job? You post under an anonymous name lets say, write a post on a page about work colleagues/what's going on in the business then people get curious? Shows this forum is full of vultures and leeches

Look at the stories,You have tried to make up about me and then when you were totally wrong every time, youve then said, it wasnt me I read it some where but Ive let it go every time. At least Carl doesnt make it up

Before you ban me/remove this post like this never happened. I wasn't lying, don't know the guy who you supposedly/apparetly did this to and don't particularly care in all honesty but

Or it's just common in any kind of job? You post under an anonymous name lets say, write a post on a page about work colleagues/what's going on in the business then people get curious? Shows this forum is full of vultures and leeches

Look at the stories,You have tried to make up about me and then when you were totally wrong every time, youve then said, it wasnt me I read it some where but Ive let it go every time. At least Carl doesnt make it up

Before you ban me/remove this post like this never happened. I wasn't lying, don't know the guy who you supposedly/apparetly did this to and don't particularly care in all honesty but

I wont be banning you? I never did before did I? But at the time you virtually made out you saw it yourself and some other stuff, but then when I pm you, you said you had not, true?

If you did not care? why did you post the stuff on here, like it was true?

Or it's just common in any kind of job? You post under an anonymous name lets say, write a post on a page about work colleagues/what's going on in the business then people get curious? Shows this forum is full of vultures and leeches

Look at the stories,You have tried to make up about me and then when you were totally wrong every time, youve then said, it wasnt me I read it some where but Ive let it go every time. At least Carl doesnt make it up

Before you ban me/remove this post like this never happened. I wasn't lying, don't know the guy who you supposedly/apparetly did this to and don't particularly care in all honesty but

I wont be banning you? I never did before did I? But at the time you virtually made out you saw it yourself and some other stuff, but then when I pm you, you said you had not, true?

If you did not care? why did you post the stuff on here, like it was true?

You've now seen the link so now know I wasn't lying, if anything isn't it a heads up? To clear your name, to make amends with the person who has called you those names? You never asked for evidence, I told you via PM I had seen a tweet about you am even gave the name. I just saw what happened and had a nose like most people do

Or it's just common in any kind of job? You post under an anonymous name lets say, write a post on a page about work colleagues/what's going on in the business then people get curious? Shows this forum is full of vultures and leeches

Look at the stories,You have tried to make up about me and then when you were totally wrong every time, youve then said, it wasnt me I read it some where but Ive let it go every time. At least Carl doesnt make it up

Before you ban me/remove this post like this never happened. I wasn't lying, don't know the guy who you supposedly/apparetly did this to and don't particularly care in all honesty but

I wont be banning you? I never did before did I? But at the time you virtually made out you saw it yourself and some other stuff, but then when I pm you, you said you had not, true?

If you did not care? why did you post the stuff on here, like it was true?

You've now seen the link so now know I wasn't lying, if anything isn't it a heads up? To clear your name, to make amends with the person who has called you those names? You never asked for evidence, I told you via PM I had seen a tweet about you am even gave the name. I just saw what happened and had a nose like most people do

On that fair enough But at the time you virtually made out you had heard it. Water under the bridge as they say

Surely the club should be more concrened by the fact that the information is getting out regardless?
The fact that the name of the person who was revealing it was called staff is irellevant.

Spot on.

When we used to have updates, I hate to think if it was the same lack of trust then?

No trust = unhappy workers.

Or it's just common in any kind of job? You post under an anonymous name lets say, write a post on a page about work colleagues/what's going on in the business then people get curious? Shows this forum is full of vultures and leeches

No.

If they really wanted to know, they could have contacted the forum?

But no, they go straight to being suspicious over members of their staff.

But the poster on the second most popular forum pretended to be a club insider. Now I doubt the club really suspected it the poster was a club employee, but if the info given out was close to the bone, it certainly raises interest in the reaches of the circle of trust.

Like most of us, we all guessed it was Carl, Borley is making the point about how dangerous it may have been if a club employee was suspected.

Point is there as always been info leaked from club so nothing is different except user name! Why wasn't club staff under suspicion then? Think people making mountain out of a worm hole! Just to suite agenda?

Point is there as always been info leaked from club so nothing is different except user name! Why wasn't club staff under suspicion then? Think people making mountain out of a worm hole! Just to suite agenda?

Totally agree with this.

Point is there as always been info leaked from club so nothing is different except user name! Why wasn't club staff under suspicion then? Think people making mountain out of a worm hole! Just to suite agenda?

Spot on Allan and its given the snipers a chance to rise again and have ago at Carl.

="Forever Blue"]

Point is there as always been info leaked from club so nothing is different except user name! Why wasn't club staff under suspicion then? Think people making mountain out of a worm hole! Just to suite agenda?

Spot on Allan and its given the snipers a chance to rise again and have ago at Carl.[/quote]

Doesnt matter who it was same principal applies other people post inside info no one complains except usual suspects! much prefer some info even if turns out wrong all part of forum life!

="Forever Blue"]

Point is there as always been info leaked from club so nothing is different except user name! Why wasn't club staff under suspicion then? Think people making mountain out of a worm hole! Just to suite agenda?

Spot on Allan and its given the snipers a chance to rise again and have ago at Carl.

Doesnt matter who it was same principal applies other people post inside info no one complains except usual suspects! much prefer some info even if turns out wrong all part of forum life! [/quote]

I could post once a week with info im told which has come to fruit even though some does and some dont but whats the point eitherway you will have the snipers or " Bullshit" replys. I've no idea why carl or anyone else even bothers posting anything there told at all to be replyed to in such ways.
Some people seem to forget its an ONLINE FORUM and its all about gossip & hear say & what there told by others yet take it all way to seriously. I mean whats a football forum without topics ...nothing

I could post once a week with info im told which has come to fruit even though some does and some dont but whats the point eitherway you will have the snipers or " Bullshit" replys. I've no idea why carl or anyone else even bothers posting anything there told at all to be replyed to in such ways.
Some people seem to forget its an ONLINE FORUM and its all about gossip & hear say & what there told by others yet take it all way to seriously. I mean whats a football forum without topics ...nothing

I'd be embarrassed if I was Borley too.

As we all know, it was revealed that a member of this forum was giving us all information about the club through a different name. We all welcomed the information, and nobody seemed to be complaining at the time.

Steve Borley responded by saying staff at the club were "under suspicion" and that this was "unfair".

For me that is hugely worrying.

It highlights the lack of trust in the club. I can't imagine having to work in those circumstances.

It seems, going by those tweets, that the club can not trust the people who work for them. That must be hugely difficult for the people who work there.

You have to ask, how many other times are they under suspicion?

Of course, this is just my opinion and no factual evidence. Just pointing out that this is something that worries me.

So what is the difference between an insider giving Carl the info so he posts under the name 'STAFF" or the insider who gave him the information posting it himself? Surely it is still leaked information and either way you look at it, somebody has got elastic lips within the club.

As we all know, it was revealed that a member of this forum was giving us all information about the club through a different name. We all welcomed the information, and nobody seemed to be complaining at the time.

Steve Borley responded by saying staff at the club were "under suspicion" and that this was "unfair".

For me that is hugely worrying.

It highlights the lack of trust in the club. I can't imagine having to work in those circumstances.

It seems, going by those tweets, that the club can not trust the people who work for them. That must be hugely difficult for the people who work there.

You have to ask, how many other times are they under suspicion?

Of course, this is just my opinion and no factual evidence. Just pointing out that this is something that worries me.

So what is the difference between an insider giving Carl the info so he posts under the name 'STAFF" or the insider who gave him the information posting it himself? Surely it is still leaked information and either way you look at it, somebody has got elastic lips within the club.

Exactly.

Another two things we've learned from this:

They should trust club staff.

Borley, as a key figure at the club, needs to stop making these sorts of comments on Twitter.