Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:44 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:47 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:47 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:48 am
worcester_ccfc wrote:Had my hopes up with that title Carl![]()
Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:48 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:48 am
Military Junta wrote:you tease Carl with a heading like that. You'll be having your hit bonus within hours at this rate![]()
Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:52 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:59 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:00 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:01 am
maccydee wrote:If Tan were to pull out today we would be liquidated within three months. Probably a lot less.
Fact
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:03 am
carlccfc wrote:Vincent Tan is "pulling out all the stops" to have Russell Slade installed as Cardiff City manager for Saturday's game.
That was the term used when I spoke to a friend this morning, apparently he is willing to pay compensation for Slade ( Slade offered his resignation but it was not accepted ), so now City are going down the route of negotiations with Orient for Slade.
Slade will be at the game on Saturday apparently, even if the paperwork has not been sorted to name him as manager but by the sounds of it, Tan is doing everything he can to get the deal done.
It has potential to get messy between the clubs, obviously Orient are trying to get as much as possible for their manager but they have been a bit daft really, printing in Tuesday's match programme, that Slade only had a game to keep his job.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:07 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:33 am
Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:If Tan were to pull out today we would be liquidated within three months. Probably a lot less.
Fact
can you proved me of proof of that fact please and even further proof that not a single party will ever show interest
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:33 am
maccydee wrote:If Tan were to pull out today we would be liquidated within three months. Probably a lot less.
Fact
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:37 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:37 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:39 am
maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:If Tan were to pull out today we would be liquidated within three months. Probably a lot less.
Fact
can you proved me of proof of that fact please and even further proof that not a single party will ever show interest
Well we were on the verge of it before he came in. Now we are in a lot more debt albeit to him so if he cut and run he would stop subsidising us. Even if we went in administration there's not enough money to keep the club going ergo HMRC would liquidate us like they did Rangers. Who could come in and sort that? They would have before. We are a second tier side with massive overheads. We are not a sound investment.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:41 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:44 am
Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:If Tan were to pull out today we would be liquidated within three months. Probably a lot less.
Fact
can you proved me of proof of that fact please and even further proof that not a single party will ever show interest
Well we were on the verge of it before he came in. Now we are in a lot more debt albeit to him so if he cut and run he would stop subsidising us. Even if we went in administration there's not enough money to keep the club going ergo HMRC would liquidate us like they did Rangers. Who could come in and sort that? They would have before. We are a second tier side with massive overheads. We are not a sound investment.
That's your assumptions based on what the courts said a number of years ago now. So really it's not fact at all especially on the area that there would be no other party interested
Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:48 am
maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:If Tan were to pull out today we would be liquidated within three months. Probably a lot less.
Fact
can you proved me of proof of that fact please and even further proof that not a single party will ever show interest
Well we were on the verge of it before he came in. Now we are in a lot more debt albeit to him so if he cut and run he would stop subsidising us. Even if we went in administration there's not enough money to keep the club going ergo HMRC would liquidate us like they did Rangers. Who could come in and sort that? They would have before. We are a second tier side with massive overheads. We are not a sound investment.
That's your assumptions based on what the courts said a number of years ago now. So really it's not fact at all especially on the area that there would be no other party interested
In my opinion it is a fact. Better?
Adam are your businesses doing well enough to but the City?
Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:38 am
carlccfc wrote:Vincent Tan is "pulling out all the stops" to have Russell Slade installed as Cardiff City manager for Saturday's game.
That was the term used when I spoke to a friend this morning, apparently he is willing to pay compensation for Slade ( Slade offered his resignation but it was not accepted ), so now City are going down the route of negotiations with Orient for Slade.
Slade will be at the game on Saturday apparently, even if the paperwork has not been sorted to name him as manager but by the sounds of it, Tan is doing everything he can to get the deal done.
It has potential to get messy between the clubs, obviously Orient are trying to get as much as possible for their manager but they have been a bit daft really, printing in Tuesday's match programme, that Slade only had a game to keep his job.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:39 am
lewispenarth wrote:another misleading header.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:46 am
NIBluebird wrote:lewispenarth wrote:another misleading header.
Great play on words - but how many thought - OH NO thats us doomed with millions of debt ???
Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:59 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:07 am
GSO Cardiff City wrote:NIBluebird wrote:lewispenarth wrote:another misleading header.
Great play on words - but how many thought - OH NO thats us doomed with millions of debt ???
We wouldn't be doomed for long... then we'd all have to go and support newport...
Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:23 am
Bakedalasker wrote:GSO Cardiff City wrote:NIBluebird wrote:lewispenarth wrote:another misleading header.
Great play on words - but how many thought - OH NO thats us doomed with millions of debt ???
We wouldn't be doomed for long... then we'd all have to go and support newport...
Millions of debt yes but to who....Tan.
Tan stand no chance of getting his money back unless we get promoted and look a good bet to stay the course this time. If Tan walks because we do not get promoted then his best best is to sell us on the cheap and cut his losses. I believe he will do that so I'm not worried one bit about us going into oblivion.
My only concern is that if someone new came in then they would look at bringing down the ongoing costs which is mainly the players wages. Our squad would be stripped down and we would most likely be staring at a few years fighting a relegation battles whatever league we were in. However it is a concern I would quite easily live with if it meant getting back to any resemblance of a football club with its traditions restored.
Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:28 am
maccydee wrote:What if the new owner liked us in red?
Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:37 am
Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:41 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:Had my hopes up with that title Carl![]()
Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:45 pm