Tue Sep 16, 2014 8:04 am
Tue Sep 16, 2014 8:53 am
Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:00 am
Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:07 am
Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:32 pm
Igovernor wrote:Obviously you lot did not see Palace play under Pulis, they were playing very good football
Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:35 pm
Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:45 pm
AfricanBluebird wrote:Igovernor wrote:Obviously you lot did not see Palace play under Pulis, they were playing very good football
![]()
Palace played very well under Pulis and his reputation for being a long ball manager is unmerited as during the last few years he got them playing quite well given the limited resources available to them.
Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:55 pm
LonCar wrote:AfricanBluebird wrote:Igovernor wrote:Obviously you lot did not see Palace play under Pulis, they were playing very good football
![]()
Palace played very well under Pulis and his reputation for being a long ball manager is unmerited as during the last few years he got them playing quite well given the limited resources available to them.
The reason stoke got rid of him was that they wanted more attractive football.
Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:59 pm
JonCCFC wrote:Why do people suddenly care about our "style of football"? No one seemed to have a problem before we got promoted...
If it gets us results then the style of football doesn't matter, our fans expect too much.
Tue Sep 16, 2014 1:59 pm
Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:05 pm
moonboots wrote:OK he would probably organise us at the back and make us harder to beat but do we really want to watch his style of football long term?