Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:08 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:14 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:23 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:33 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:42 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:56 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:58 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:59 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:00 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:no its getting ridiculous now started with support of malky and now non support/backing of ole![]()
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:01 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:ffs barry chuckles back to usual where have I said ole cant be criticised
no go back in your little corner and be a nice mod where you've been put to shut you up
markemark you are spot on![]()
![]()
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:02 pm
DrDre wrote:
Too right, Malky was the anti-Tan hero and now that he's indefensible Ole has become Tan's proxy to attack and criticise.![]()
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:09 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:10 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:DrDre wrote:
Too right, Malky was the anti-Tan hero and now that he's indefensible Ole has become Tan's proxy to attack and criticise.![]()
Or could it be that they just happen to have doubts about OGS capabilities?
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:13 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:16 pm
DrDre wrote:and by some strange coincidence Ole's biggest critics are also Tan's worst haters.
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:16 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:where does that say he cant be criticised ffs you allways see what you want to see not what is actually said you are a fool but don't let that stop you idiot![]()
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:21 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:25 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:spot on chuckles have to agree with you there only a fool and an idiot would see something different to what I posted
yes you are defo a fool and an idiot keep up the good work you are heading for the coveted award of board fool and idiot 2014![]()
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:33 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:35 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:exactly give it a rest NOT you are not allowed to fool
glad to see you have now seen what i wrote![]()
Barking.
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:41 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 5:51 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:20 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:why all the questioning and disbelieving of Hudson going
Because Steve, it didn't look to many that Hudson had lost any of his game, he was playing well up to the point of sale
surely its not just to have a go at ole?
No it is not to have a go at Ole but simply questioning the decision.
a lot of fans backed malky just to get at tan
A lot of fans appreciated the success that Malky brought to the club and will never forget it either, it is in the record books as a success and always will be. Some people showed loyalty when loyalty is a dying commodity in football.
now it seems fans just want to have a go at oles every move just to get at tan
Disagree with this comment, Ole is being judged on performances and when it is critical it has nothing to do with Tan.
personally Ive had more than enough thread after thread questioning criticising doubting ole ffs give it a rest
So if a performance is crap are you suggesting people don't say so or if they do then they are only doing so to have a pop at Tan? The word you used after the performance at Fulham on Saturday was 'crap!', was that aimed at Tan, the team or Ole?
I used to enjoy this board looked foreward to coming on here for good banter/debate but that's quickly disappearing with the constant turning of every thread to have a go at ole/tan![]()
![]()
![]()
I believe it is posts like yours that is creating the misconception that fans are against Ole because of a hatred of Tan, from what I can read and see is people are not convinced that Ole is the right man to deliver promotion BUT are supporting him and willing and hoping he achieves success but people like you are looking for something extra that is simply not there.
Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:23 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:why all the questioning and disbelieving of Hudson going
surely its not just to have a go at ole?
a lot of fans backed malky just to get at tan
now it seems fans just want to have a go at oles every move just to get at tan
personally Ive had more than enough thread after thread questioning criticising doubting ole ffs give it a rest
I used to enjoy this board looked foreward to coming on here for good banter/debate but that's quickly disappearing with the constant turning of every thread to have a go at ole/tan![]()
![]()
![]()
Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:28 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:29 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Part 3 will be about the Donkey
Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:33 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Part 3 will be about the Donkey
Now that's one decision I agree with OGS on entirely... selling that donkey Gestede.
Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:50 pm
Wed Sep 03, 2014 7:52 pm
brewer918 wrote:Think the OP makes a valid point! Looking back it does seem the pro malky / anti tan supporters do seem to be lining OGS up for a fall with their comments regarding OGS tactics, OGS letting Hudson go, OGS having the strongest team in our history, OGS the tinkerman, OGS being Tans man, Indirect digs at Tan through OGS. I could go on but anyone looking from the outside would probably agree!
Wed Sep 03, 2014 8:00 pm
carlccfc wrote:brewer918 wrote:Think the OP makes a valid point! Looking back it does seem the pro malky / anti tan supporters do seem to be lining OGS up for a fall with their comments regarding OGS tactics, OGS letting Hudson go, OGS having the strongest team in our history, OGS the tinkerman, OGS being Tans man, Indirect digs at Tan through OGS. I could go on but anyone looking from the outside would probably agree!
Or could it just be as simple as 'not entirely convinced by Ole's tactics, line-ups and results.
Don't over complicate the matter by looking for something that is not there.