Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:40 pm
Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:00 pm
Tue Aug 26, 2014 4:09 pm
Brighton & hove Albion wrote:Were groomed and gang raped in Rotherham since 97 - 2000 (Labour were in power)
It's a Labour council and they allowed this to happen because they and the police didn't want to be accused of being racists. Today's report reveals some shocking findings, one 11 year old was gang raped over 6 years and doused in petrol and when she turned 16 the perpetrators disregarded her because she was to old.
The report today refuse to say who these perpetrators are because of community cohesion but why don't these Labour poliltions come out and say it was Asian men. They allowed this to happen because they want the Asian vote, why do thousands of Asian immigrants flock to these shores? They can't get it at home and know Mohammed married a 7 year old. The labour council on the news know who allowed it to happen is asked why don't you and your party resign as you allowed it to happen? Response = We are the solution, what the f**k.
If Labour get into power then it'll start again. The Asian community vote Labour and you must wonder why, doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.
Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:21 pm
Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:34 pm
AlwaysBBlue wrote:Brighton & hove Albion wrote:Were groomed and gang raped in Rotherham since 97 - 2000 (Labour were in power)
It's a Labour council and they allowed this to happen because they and the police didn't want to be accused of being racists. Today's report reveals some shocking findings, one 11 year old was gang raped over 6 years and doused in petrol and when she turned 16 the perpetrators disregarded her because she was to old.
The report today refuse to say who these perpetrators are because of community cohesion but why don't these Labour poliltions come out and say it was Asian men. They allowed this to happen because they want the Asian vote, why do thousands of Asian immigrants flock to these shores? They can't get it at home and know Mohammed married a 7 year old. The labour council on the news know who allowed it to happen is asked why don't you and your party resign as you allowed it to happen? Response = We are the solution, what the f**k.
If Labour get into power then it'll start again. The Asian community vote Labour and you must wonder why, doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.
has this number dropped under the tories? if so could you provide the figures to see how much is has dropped and praise the tories accordingly?
if not then could you maybe blame big parties as a whole and not just labour? as they are about as bad as each other
Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:50 pm
Brighton & hove Albion wrote:Were groomed and gang raped in Rotherham since 97 - 2000 (Labour were in power)
It's a Labour council and they allowed this to happen because they and the police didn't want to be accused of being racists. Today's report reveals some shocking findings, one 11 year old was gang raped over 6 years and doused in petrol and when she turned 16 the perpetrators disregarded her because she was to old.
The report today refuse to say who these perpetrators are because of community cohesion but why don't these Labour poliltions come out and say it was Asian men. They allowed this to happen because they want the Asian vote, why do thousands of Asian immigrants flock to these shores? They can't get it at home and know Mohammed married a 7 year old. The labour council on the news know who allowed it to happen is asked why don't you and your party resign as you allowed it to happen? Response = We are the solution, what the f**k.
If Labour get into power then it'll start again. The Asian community vote Labour and you must wonder why, doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.
Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:53 pm
Bluebina wrote:Brighton & hove Albion wrote:Were groomed and gang raped in Rotherham since 97 - 2000 (Labour were in power)
It's a Labour council and they allowed this to happen because they and the police didn't want to be accused of being racists. Today's report reveals some shocking findings, one 11 year old was gang raped over 6 years and doused in petrol and when she turned 16 the perpetrators disregarded her because she was to old.
The report today refuse to say who these perpetrators are because of community cohesion but why don't these Labour poliltions come out and say it was Asian men. They allowed this to happen because they want the Asian vote, why do thousands of Asian immigrants flock to these shores? They can't get it at home and know Mohammed married a 7 year old. The labour council on the news know who allowed it to happen is asked why don't you and your party resign as you allowed it to happen? Response = We are the solution, what the f**k.
If Labour get into power then it'll start again. The Asian community vote Labour and you must wonder why, doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.
A Brighton fan posting about Girls in Rotherham
Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:55 pm
Brighton & hove Albion wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:Brighton & hove Albion wrote:Were groomed and gang raped in Rotherham since 97 - 2000 (Labour were in power)
It's a Labour council and they allowed this to happen because they and the police didn't want to be accused of being racists. Today's report reveals some shocking findings, one 11 year old was gang raped over 6 years and doused in petrol and when she turned 16 the perpetrators disregarded her because she was to old.
The report today refuse to say who these perpetrators are because of community cohesion but why don't these Labour poliltions come out and say it was Asian men. They allowed this to happen because they want the Asian vote, why do thousands of Asian immigrants flock to these shores? They can't get it at home and know Mohammed married a 7 year old. The labour council on the news know who allowed it to happen is asked why don't you and your party resign as you allowed it to happen? Response = We are the solution, what the f**k.
If Labour get into power then it'll start again. The Asian community vote Labour and you must wonder why, doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.
has this number dropped under the tories? if so could you provide the figures to see how much is has dropped and praise the tories accordingly?
if not then could you maybe blame big parties as a whole and not just labour? as they are about as bad as each other
Are you taking the piss? This started to happen when Labour gained power in 97. The conservatives have only found out what the Labour party was up too. Don't forget all this abuse around the country is under Labour controlled councils.
I hate starting these threads and saying the word Paki as got a warning and next time a proper ban, The moderator must be a Labour supporter. Buut I feel this threads needs to be said and started just like any other football or non football message board.
This is the result of many factors.
1) Over zealous political correctness; reason being is that there was fear from within the appropriate and omitting authorities of being branded as racist for tackling an issue that's apparent within a single ethnic minority community.
2) Segregated and divided communities by failed multiculturalist policies; we don't live in a multicultural society which is intertwined and benefits one another. What we have is a society which has multiple cultures all separated and with no real communication between them.
3) A country that's branded racist and xenophobic at any opportunity; we're told that any criticism of another race, religion or culture is racist. This is taught from a very young age, tolerance is one thing, but being told you HAVE to tolerate every aspect is another. This aspect is very similar to 1).
4) Backward belief systems of South-East Asia; Rape is very, very common in places like Pakistan and India. In many aspects of these communities, anyone screaming rape is just seen as a promiscuous teenager and treated as such which holds very harsh sentences.
The reality is, you have a recipe for disaster. It's almost as though the Pakistani community in this context knows they're shielded by these facts and therefore makes them untouchable. Any perking up, it becomes a race issue, authorities' heads pipe down to save their own career and it goes back to normal. We have a serious issue regarding community relationships now, trust in these communities is already low, what about now? Unfortunately, we're reaping what we've sowed and these children are the immediate victims. When a section of society is immune to criticism, they can behave and act accordingly or at their own will, which is what we saw. This is not isolated, this is a nationwide problem. What makes this worse is that white girls are being targeted, therefore, making this an entirely racial crime. However, those seeking justice will be called racist (as already in this thread) for making suggestions for ways to tackle this issue.
As others have pointed out, had this been a white gang grooming Asian girls, there'd be riots, tabloids screaming racist gangs etc. The reverse just sees the a minute similarity. The naming of the ethnic group is a start, because as a society we need to remove these barbaric belief systems and install our own. This is a Western Liberal Democracy. We should therefore be promoting our very own belief systems rather than catering for others', and we really shouldn't shy away from telling other religious/ethnic groups that what they do, we believe is wrong and incompatible with our belief structure etc.
But until we do that, unfortunately this epidemic will continue as many know they'll get away with it and they do as we correspond on here, They'll be out today and all night raping white girls and no they won't stop because they don't know any different.
Fri Aug 29, 2014 2:56 pm
Brighton & hove Albion wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:Brighton & hove Albion wrote:Were groomed and gang raped in Rotherham since 97 - 2000 (Labour were in power)
It's a Labour council and they allowed this to happen because they and the police didn't want to be accused of being racists. Today's report reveals some shocking findings, one 11 year old was gang raped over 6 years and doused in petrol and when she turned 16 the perpetrators disregarded her because she was to old.
The report today refuse to say who these perpetrators are because of community cohesion but why don't these Labour poliltions come out and say it was Asian men. They allowed this to happen because they want the Asian vote, why do thousands of Asian immigrants flock to these shores? They can't get it at home and know Mohammed married a 7 year old. The labour council on the news know who allowed it to happen is asked why don't you and your party resign as you allowed it to happen? Response = We are the solution, what the f**k.
If Labour get into power then it'll start again. The Asian community vote Labour and you must wonder why, doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.
has this number dropped under the tories? if so could you provide the figures to see how much is has dropped and praise the tories accordingly?
if not then could you maybe blame big parties as a whole and not just labour? as they are about as bad as each other
Are you taking the piss? This started to happen when Labour gained power in 97. The conservatives have only found out what the Labour party was up too. Don't forget all this abuse around the country is under Labour controlled councils.
I hate starting these threads and saying the word Paki as got a warning and next time a proper ban, The moderator must be a Labour supporter. Buut I feel this threads needs to be said and started just like any other football or non football message board.
This is the result of many factors.
1) Over zealous political correctness; reason being is that there was fear from within the appropriate and omitting authorities of being branded as racist for tackling an issue that's apparent within a single ethnic minority community.
2) Segregated and divided communities by failed multiculturalist policies; we don't live in a multicultural society which is intertwined and benefits one another. What we have is a society which has multiple cultures all separated and with no real communication between them.
3) A country that's branded racist and xenophobic at any opportunity; we're told that any criticism of another race, religion or culture is racist. This is taught from a very young age, tolerance is one thing, but being told you HAVE to tolerate every aspect is another. This aspect is very similar to 1).
4) Backward belief systems of South-East Asia; Rape is very, very common in places like Pakistan and India. In many aspects of these communities, anyone screaming rape is just seen as a promiscuous teenager and treated as such which holds very harsh sentences.
The reality is, you have a recipe for disaster. It's almost as though the Pakistani community in this context knows they're shielded by these facts and therefore makes them untouchable. Any perking up, it becomes a race issue, authorities' heads pipe down to save their own career and it goes back to normal. We have a serious issue regarding community relationships now, trust in these communities is already low, what about now? Unfortunately, we're reaping what we've sowed and these children are the immediate victims. When a section of society is immune to criticism, they can behave and act accordingly or at their own will, which is what we saw. This is not isolated, this is a nationwide problem. What makes this worse is that white girls are being targeted, therefore, making this an entirely racial crime. However, those seeking justice will be called racist (as already in this thread) for making suggestions for ways to tackle this issue.
As others have pointed out, had this been a white gang grooming Asian girls, there'd be riots, tabloids screaming racist gangs etc. The reverse just sees the a minute similarity. The naming of the ethnic group is a start, because as a society we need to remove these barbaric belief systems and install our own. This is a Western Liberal Democracy. We should therefore be promoting our very own belief systems rather than catering for others', and we really shouldn't shy away from telling other religious/ethnic groups that what they do, we believe is wrong and incompatible with our belief structure etc.
But until we do that, unfortunately this epidemic will continue as many know they'll get away with it and they do as we correspond on here, They'll be out today and all night raping white girls and no they won't stop because they don't know any different.
Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:06 pm
Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:07 pm
SwampCCFC wrote:why did an overly PC labour council have to do with 1400 girls being raped by asian men?
what would a different (say tory led) council have done differently? genuine question.
Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:11 pm
AlwaysBBlue wrote:SwampCCFC wrote:why did an overly PC labour council have to do with 1400 girls being raped by asian men?
what would a different (say tory led) council have done differently? genuine question.
nothing different is the answer, just blinkered idiots using this horrific incedent to grandstand, its appauling
Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:42 pm
SwampCCFC wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:SwampCCFC wrote:why did an overly PC labour council have to do with 1400 girls being raped by asian men?
what would a different (say tory led) council have done differently? genuine question.
nothing different is the answer, just blinkered idiots using this horrific incedent to grandstand, its appauling
exactly what i thought. i am struggling to find factual answers to my questions above. when the BBC open these things up to comment all we get is emotive stuff about labour destroying the country through PC, and this being their fault.
if they had not been PC what would have been the outcome?
political correctness has spread to all parties now, though its probably true labour are the most PC.
Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:58 pm
SwampCCFC wrote:why did an overly PC labour council have to do with 1400 girls being raped by asian men?
what would a different (say tory led) council have done differently? genuine question.
Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:32 pm
Brighton & hove Albion wrote:SwampCCFC wrote:why did an overly PC labour council have to do with 1400 girls being raped by asian men?
what would a different (say tory led) council have done differently? genuine question.
Holy f**k. Are you serous?
Time I vacated this board for good.
Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:42 pm
AlwaysBBlue wrote:Brighton & hove Albion wrote:SwampCCFC wrote:why did an overly PC labour council have to do with 1400 girls being raped by asian men?
what would a different (say tory led) council have done differently? genuine question.
Holy f**k. Are you serous?
Time I vacated this board for good.
translation: he asked a genuine uestion that i can't answer...better abuse instead.
can you answer the question? or is he just an idiot for not knowing how the otherwise inept torys would have stopped this?
Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:50 pm
They allowed this to happen because they want the Asian vote, why do thousands of Asian immigrants flock to these shores? They can't get it at home and know Mohammed married a 7 year old. The labour council on the news know who allowed it to happen is asked why don't you and your party resign as you allowed it to happen?
British interwar period[edit]
Most early Pakistani settlers and their families moved from port towns to the Midlands, as Britain declared war on Germany in 1939. Many of these Kashmiris and Sindhis worked in the munition factories of Birmingham. After the war, most of these early settlers stayed on in the region and took advantage of an increase in the number of jobs.[19]
There were 832,500 Muslim Indian soldiers in 1945; most of these recruits were from what is now Pakistan.[20] These soldiers fought alongside the British Army during the First and Second World Wars, particularly in the latter, during the Battle of France, the North African Campaign and the Burma Campaign. Many contributed to the war effort as skilled labourers, including as assembly-line workers in the aircraft factory at Castle Bromwich, Birmingham, which produced Spitfire fighters.[20] Most returned to the subcontinent after their service, although many of these former soldiers returned to Britain in the 1950s and 1960s to fill labour shortages.
Post-Independence[edit]
Following the Second World War and the break-up of the British Empire, Pakistani immigration to the United Kingdom increased, especially during the 1950s and 1960s. This was made easier because Pakistan was a member of the Commonwealth of Nations.[9] Pakistanis were invited by employers to fill labour shortages which arose after the Second World War. As Commonwealth citizens, they were eligible for most British civic rights. They found employment in the textile industries of Lancashire and Yorkshire, manufacturing in the West Midlands, and car production and food processing industries of Luton and Slough. It was common for Pakistani employees to work on night shifts and at other less-desirable hours.[21]
Many Kashmiris began emigrating from Pakistan after the completion of Mangla Dam in Mirpur in the late 1950s led to the destruction of hundreds of villages. Up to 5,000 people from Mirpur (five per cent of the displaced)[22] left for Britain, the displaced Kashmiris being given legal and financial assistance by the British contractor which had built the dam.[23] Those from unaffected areas of Pakistan, such as the Punjab, also immigrated to Britain to help fill labour shortages. Punjabis began to leave Pakistan in the 1960s. They worked in the foundries of the English Midlands, and a significant number also settled in Southall in West London.[24]
During the 1960s, a considerable number of Pakistanis also arrived from urban areas. Many of these people were qualified teachers, doctors, and engineers.[21] They had a predisposition to settle in London due to its greater economic opportunities compared to the Midlands or the North of England.[21] Most medical staff from Pakistan were recruited in the 1960s and almost all worked for the National Health Service.[25]
During the 1970s, a large number of East African Asians, most of whom already held British passports because they were brought to Africa by British colonialists, entered the UK from Kenya and Uganda. Idi Amin chose to expel all Ugandan Asians in 1972 because of the perception that they were responsible for the country's economic stagnation.[26] The Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 and Immigration Act 1971 largely restricted any further primary immigration to the UK, although family members of already-settled immigrants were allowed to join their relatives.[27]