Sat Aug 23, 2014 9:37 pm
Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:25 pm
blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
Sun Aug 24, 2014 7:34 am
BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
Jesus, all of a sudden Tan is a victim? The most farcical thing about this whole saga is the apologists lauding him as a wronged victim ... It's not as if he forced a damaging, fan splitting rebrand on the fans or anything is it?!
Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:03 am
RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
Jesus, all of a sudden Tan is a victim? The most farcical thing about this whole saga is the apologists lauding him as a wronged victim ... It's not as if he forced a damaging, fan splitting rebrand on the fans or anything is it?!
It's not he's a victim as such, just that lots outright blamed him for Malky leaving. Most people now see that Tan was right to do it and have the balls to say "I was wrong". Tan did day the truth will come out and surprise people fair play to him
Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:16 am
blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:49 am
DrDre wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
our ex-manager is a vile racist, it's Tan's fault!
Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:54 am
Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:30 pm
BracklaBlue72 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
The way this whole thing was handled was shocking really. He has obviously sat on this evidence for quite some time and it looks as if he has held onto it until he could use it to hurt McKay as much as he could for maximum impact, when he had a job offer. Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just as he applied for vacancies there; Norwich and west ham in particular but possibly celtic too? IMO Tan should have just gone direct to the FA when he obtained evidence and sacked him there and then. Then let the relevant people investigate and then decide whether the police should also be involved.
The way Tan has held onto this evidence and used it to slowly besmirch McKay, before finally telling palace when it looks like that club may have contacted McKay prior to pulis leaving smacks of vindictiveness and does him no credit
Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:44 pm
Man of Harlech wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
The way this whole thing was handled was shocking really. He has obviously sat on this evidence for quite some time and it looks as if he has held onto it until he could use it to hurt McKay as much as he could for maximum impact, when he had a job offer. Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just as he applied for vacancies there; Norwich and west ham in particular but possibly celtic too? IMO Tan should have just gone direct to the FA when he obtained evidence and sacked him there and then. Then let the relevant people investigate and then decide whether the police should also be involved.
The way Tan has held onto this evidence and used it to slowly besmirch McKay, before finally telling palace when it looks like that club may have contacted McKay prior to pulis leaving smacks of vindictiveness and does him no credit
Wow Brackla, you are remarkably well informed. You must be a very important person. Or are you just mouthing off, making assumptions and presenting them as fact, as do so many anti Tan people?
Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:49 pm
Man of Harlech wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
The way this whole thing was handled was shocking really. He has obviously sat on this evidence for quite some time and it looks as if he has held onto it until he could use it to hurt McKay as much as he could for maximum impact, when he had a job offer. Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just as he applied for vacancies there; Norwich and west ham in particular but possibly celtic too? IMO Tan should have just gone direct to the FA when he obtained evidence and sacked him there and then. Then let the relevant people investigate and then decide whether the police should also be involved.
The way Tan has held onto this evidence and used it to slowly besmirch McKay, before finally telling palace when it looks like that club may have contacted McKay prior to pulis leaving smacks of vindictiveness and does him no credit
Wow Brackla, you are remarkably well informed. You must be a very important person. Or are you just mouthing off, making assumptions and presenting them as fact, as do so many anti Tan people?
Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:56 pm
DrDre wrote:Man of Harlech wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
The way this whole thing was handled was shocking really. He has obviously sat on this evidence for quite some time and it looks as if he has held onto it until he could use it to hurt McKay as much as he could for maximum impact, when he had a job offer. Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just as he applied for vacancies there; Norwich and west ham in particular but possibly celtic too? IMO Tan should have just gone direct to the FA when he obtained evidence and sacked him there and then. Then let the relevant people investigate and then decide whether the police should also be involved.
The way Tan has held onto this evidence and used it to slowly besmirch McKay, before finally telling palace when it looks like that club may have contacted McKay prior to pulis leaving smacks of vindictiveness and does him no credit
Wow Brackla, you are remarkably well informed. You must be a very important person. Or are you just mouthing off, making assumptions and presenting them as fact, as do so many anti Tan people?
I just love how some people make out the consequences of Malky's behaviour as somehow being Tan's fault.
Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:09 pm
BracklaBlue72 wrote:DrDre wrote:Man of Harlech wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
The way this whole thing was handled was shocking really. He has obviously sat on this evidence for quite some time and it looks as if he has held onto it until he could use it to hurt McKay as much as he could for maximum impact, when he had a job offer. Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just as he applied for vacancies there; Norwich and west ham in particular but possibly celtic too? IMO Tan should have just gone direct to the FA when he obtained evidence and sacked him there and then. Then let the relevant people investigate and then decide whether the police should also be involved.
The way Tan has held onto this evidence and used it to slowly besmirch McKay, before finally telling palace when it looks like that club may have contacted McKay prior to pulis leaving smacks of vindictiveness and does him no credit
Wow Brackla, you are remarkably well informed. You must be a very important person. Or are you just mouthing off, making assumptions and presenting them as fact, as do so many anti Tan people?
I just love how some people make out the consequences of Malky's behaviour as somehow being Tan's fault.
No I'm "making out" that Tan is responsible for his actions as is McKay .
Do you only comprehend what you need to comprehend to shoehorn into your own agenda? Or can you genuinely not read very well Dr Dre in da house?
Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:15 pm
DrDre wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:DrDre wrote:Man of Harlech wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
The way this whole thing was handled was shocking really. He has obviously sat on this evidence for quite some time and it looks as if he has held onto it until he could use it to hurt McKay as much as he could for maximum impact, when he had a job offer. Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just as he applied for vacancies there; Norwich and west ham in particular but possibly celtic too? IMO Tan should have just gone direct to the FA when he obtained evidence and sacked him there and then. Then let the relevant people investigate and then decide whether the police should also be involved.
The way Tan has held onto this evidence and used it to slowly besmirch McKay, before finally telling palace when it looks like that club may have contacted McKay prior to pulis leaving smacks of vindictiveness and does him no credit
Wow Brackla, you are remarkably well informed. You must be a very important person. Or are you just mouthing off, making assumptions and presenting them as fact, as do so many anti Tan people?
I just love how some people make out the consequences of Malky's behaviour as somehow being Tan's fault.
No I'm "making out" that Tan is responsible for his actions as is McKay .
Do you only comprehend what you need to comprehend to shoehorn into your own agenda? Or can you genuinely not read very well Dr Dre in da house?
I can read very well thank you. I actually read your post which said "Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just". Care to tell us how you know this? or are you just pulling stuff out of your arse?![]()
I can also comprehend that the thing that shook you most was not Malky's and Moody's vile messages but "the shocking way Tan handled this"![]()
Nuff said
Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:30 pm
Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:35 pm
swansealad69 wrote:Dont blame tan as its you the fans fault.
Its u who wilted when tan said he was pulling out and basically allowed him to take full control of your club.
Didnt hear many complaints when u beat man city or even reach the prem.
Funny how u blame everyone but your selfs for the shit u are in.
Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:38 pm
swansealad69 wrote:Dont blame tan as its you the fans fault.
Its u who wilted when tan said he was pulling out and basically allowed him to take full control of your club.
Didnt hear many complaints when u beat man city or even reach the prem.
Funny how u blame everyone but your selfs for the shit u are in.
Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:43 pm
DrDre wrote: I actually read your post which said "Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just". Care to tell us how you know this? or are you just pulling stuff out of your arse?![]()
BracklaBlue72 wrote:There are also several threads from several sources on how "the club" have offered "references" for McKay at the time of job application.
BracklaBlue72 wrote:Yo Dre. The thread is about victimising poor Mr Tan. If you'd like to ( once again) pass comment on Mr McKay there are around 20 threads on it just on this page. Keep up at the back Dre![]()
Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:44 pm
BracklaBlue72 wrote:DrDre wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:DrDre wrote:Man of Harlech wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
The way this whole thing was handled was shocking really. He has obviously sat on this evidence for quite some time and it looks as if he has held onto it until he could use it to hurt McKay as much as he could for maximum impact, when he had a job offer. Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just as he applied for vacancies there; Norwich and west ham in particular but possibly celtic too? IMO Tan should have just gone direct to the FA when he obtained evidence and sacked him there and then. Then let the relevant people investigate and then decide whether the police should also be involved.
The way Tan has held onto this evidence and used it to slowly besmirch McKay, before finally telling palace when it looks like that club may have contacted McKay prior to pulis leaving smacks of vindictiveness and does him no credit
Wow Brackla, you are remarkably well informed. You must be a very important person. Or are you just mouthing off, making assumptions and presenting them as fact, as do so many anti Tan people?
I just love how some people make out the consequences of Malky's behaviour as somehow being Tan's fault.
No I'm "making out" that Tan is responsible for his actions as is McKay .
Do you only comprehend what you need to comprehend to shoehorn into your own agenda? Or can you genuinely not read very well Dr Dre in da house?
I can read very well thank you. I actually read your post which said "Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just". Care to tell us how you know this? or are you just pulling stuff out of your arse?![]()
I can also comprehend that the thing that shook you most was not Malky's and Moody's vile messages but "the shocking way Tan handled this"![]()
Nuff said
Yo Dre. The thread is about victimising poor Mr Tan. If you'd like to ( once again) pass comment on Mr McKay there are around 20 threads on it just on this page. Keep up at the back Dre![]()
There are also several threads from several sources on how "the club" have offered "references" for McKay at the time of job application.
Dre , you are an ass licking Tan troll
Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:52 pm
markeMark wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:DrDre wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:DrDre wrote:Man of Harlech wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:RYANBLUE wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:blue lagoon wrote:join the band waggon
The way this whole thing was handled was shocking really. He has obviously sat on this evidence for quite some time and it looks as if he has held onto it until he could use it to hurt McKay as much as he could for maximum impact, when he had a job offer. Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just as he applied for vacancies there; Norwich and west ham in particular but possibly celtic too? IMO Tan should have just gone direct to the FA when he obtained evidence and sacked him there and then. Then let the relevant people investigate and then decide whether the police should also be involved.
The way Tan has held onto this evidence and used it to slowly besmirch McKay, before finally telling palace when it looks like that club may have contacted McKay prior to pulis leaving smacks of vindictiveness and does him no credit
I'm not obviously anything mr Mark, unless that is, you're somehow making assumptions?![]()
Wow Brackla, you are remarkably well informed. You must be a very important person. Or are you just mouthing off, making assumptions and presenting them as fact, as do so many anti Tan people?
I just love how some people make out the consequences of Malky's behaviour as somehow being Tan's fault.
No I'm "making out" that Tan is responsible for his actions as is McKay .
Do you only comprehend what you need to comprehend to shoehorn into your own agenda? Or can you genuinely not read very well Dr Dre in da house?
I can read very well thank you. I actually read your post which said "Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just". Care to tell us how you know this? or are you just pulling stuff out of your arse?![]()
I can also comprehend that the thing that shook you most was not Malky's and Moody's vile messages but "the shocking way Tan handled this"![]()
Nuff said
Yo Dre. The thread is about victimising poor Mr Tan. If you'd like to ( once again) pass comment on Mr McKay there are around 20 threads on it just on this page. Keep up at the back Dre![]()
There are also several threads from several sources on how "the club" have offered "references" for McKay at the time of job application.
Dre , you are an ass licking Tan troll
Brackla is obviously a man on the inside with access to information that nobody else is able to get. What exactly has Tan been saying when he's phoning all these other clubs, and maybe you can let us all know if Tan is considering some sort of compromise with the fans anytime soon. Good to know we have someone on the inside who will keep us up to date with anything Tan is doing.
Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:07 pm
DrDre wrote:DrDre wrote: I actually read your post which said "Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just". Care to tell us how you know this? or are you just pulling stuff out of your arse?
BracklaBlue72 wrote:There are also several threads from several sources on how "the club" have offered "references" for McKay at the time of job application.
so you picked up rumours off a messageboard! Nice one
BracklaBlue72 wrote:Yo Dre. The thread is about victimising poor Mr Tan. If you'd like to ( once again) pass comment on Mr McKay there are around 20 threads on it just on this page. Keep up at the back Dre![]()
my question was exactly on the reasons you're using to attack Tan on this thread. Your reasons were other threads on the message board![]()
You're not a very independent-minded young homo now, are you Brackla?
Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:35 pm
BracklaBlue72 wrote:DrDre wrote:DrDre wrote: I actually read your post which said "Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just". Care to tell us how you know this? or are you just pulling stuff out of your arse?
BracklaBlue72 wrote:There are also several threads from several sources on how "the club" have offered "references" for McKay at the time of job application.
so you picked up rumours off a messageboard! Nice one
BracklaBlue72 wrote:Yo Dre. The thread is about victimising poor Mr Tan. If you'd like to ( once again) pass comment on Mr McKay there are around 20 threads on it just on this page. Keep up at the back Dre![]()
my question was exactly on the reasons you're using to attack Tan on this thread. Your reasons were other threads on the message board![]()
You're not a very independent-minded young homo now, are you Brackla?
Correct on two counts Snoop Doggy doggy dog Dre. Unless you are referring to a homo sapien , which would make you correct on one point. You however, I'm not so sure, as real men don't name call on message boards surely?
Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:53 pm
DrDre wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:DrDre wrote:DrDre wrote: I actually read your post which said "Tan has also been phoning other clubs to bad mouth McKay just". Care to tell us how you know this? or are you just pulling stuff out of your arse?
BracklaBlue72 wrote:There are also several threads from several sources on how "the club" have offered "references" for McKay at the time of job application.
so you picked up rumours off a messageboard! Nice one
BracklaBlue72 wrote:Yo Dre. The thread is about victimising poor Mr Tan. If you'd like to ( once again) pass comment on Mr McKay there are around 20 threads on it just on this page. Keep up at the back Dre![]()
my question was exactly on the reasons you're using to attack Tan on this thread. Your reasons were other threads on the message board![]()
You're not a very independent-minded young homo now, are you Brackla?
Correct on two counts Snoop Doggy doggy dog Dre. Unless you are referring to a homo sapien , which would make you correct on one point. You however, I'm not so sure, as real men don't name call on message boards surely?
So you admit that your theory about Tan scurpering Malky's career is just bogus rumours. Thank you. At least you're a honest young homo, if not very independent-minded![]()
As for the name-calling, it's just 'banter' mate, just 'banter'