Why do people believe the papers when they want too yet...

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

He did not get where he is today by not having the balls to do something! You clown!

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

He did not get where he is today by not having the balls to do something! You clown!

Well it's been six months and the police haven't been called in so that's tells you something doesn't it. It's all assumptions and no hard evidence which would stand up in court.

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

He did not get where he is today by not having the balls to do something! You clown!

Well it's been six months and the police haven't been called in so that's tells you something doesn't it. It's all assumptions and no hard evidence which would stand up in court.

You've been watching too much tele!

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

He did not get where he is today by not having the balls to do something! You clown!

Well it's been six months and the police haven't been called in so that's tells you something doesn't it. It's all assumptions and no hard evidence which would stand up in court.

at present the evidence is in the possesion of the fa or havnt you been reading other threads? or are you just banging on with your own agenda as you have opened several threads stating basically same things put in different ways!

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

He did not get where he is today by not having the balls to do something! You clown!

Well it's been six months and the police haven't been called in so that's tells you something doesn't it. It's all assumptions and no hard evidence which would stand up in court.

You've been watching too much tele!

Claims of serious fraud are being mentioned so why haven't the authorities been brought in? Nothing to do with watching tele

2 x apologees out of the blue.
1 x job offer withdrawn.

The evidence has been good enough to cause the above and it hasn't even been fully assessed yet.

Also a civil case does not need the sort of evidence or police interaction that is needed for a crimiinal case.

2 x apologees out of the blue.
1 x job offer withdrawn.

The evidence has been good enough to cause the above and it hasn't even been fully assessed yet.

Also a civil case does not need the sort of evidence or police interaction that is needed for a crimiinal case.

This is fraud which would be a criminal case if what Tan is claiming is true.

I just watched it on the bbc. They didn't go into detail but said the allegations are very serious.

I just watched it on the bbc. They didn't go into detail but said the allegations are very serious.

Exactly 'allegations'

2 x apologees out of the blue.
1 x job offer withdrawn.

The evidence has been good enough to cause the above and it hasn't even been fully assessed yet.

Also a civil case does not need the sort of evidence or police interaction that is needed for a crimiinal case.

This is fraud which would be a criminal case if what Tan is claiming is true.

A private citizen can bring a civil fraud case against others without it ever going criminal.

2 x apologees out of the blue.
1 x job offer withdrawn.

The evidence has been good enough to cause the above and it hasn't even been fully assessed yet.

Also a civil case does not need the sort of evidence or police interaction that is needed for a crimiinal case.

This is fraud which would be a criminal case if what Tan is claiming is true.

A private citizen can bring a civil fraud case against others without it ever going criminal.

But this is a number of parties colluding together and in my opinion would have to be criminal

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

I dont believe paper talk myself .. but im sure a few prominent members of this forum swear by the daily mail and say its been spot on with stories and news

How many times do you need to be told. The files were handed in on Wednesday to fa. Things will unfold from here now there is evidence and an accusation there will be an investigation. It doesn't all happen in a day.

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

I dont believe paper talk myself .. but im sure a few prominent members of this forum swear by the daily mail and say its been spot on with stories and news

Jinks, right enough again some on here had its contents down as biblical truth.

Do you think they would print this texts without hard proof?
Not really the type of things they would make up.

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

maybe tan got what he wanted when malky apologised and left with nothing...

Call the papers all the names under the sun if they read something they don't like ?

Leave it for the courts and fraud squad (if Tan has the balls to do it)

how deep is that hole in the sand mate ??

Yes I agree Jinks but would you believe those said people 100% ?