Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:57 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:05 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:18 pm
JamesC wrote:3x0=0
f**k that
Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:24 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:24 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:34 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:40 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:49 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:50 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:42 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:43 pm
AlwaysBBlue wrote:Hypothetical obviously.
but lets say CCFC offers you a job, high ranking. pays you...lets say...3x whatever you earn now. BUT you have to answer directly to tan
you have no say in the rebrand btw
would you take it? it would of course mean being a company man and, at any time you are working, would have to endorse the rebrand.
Thu Aug 07, 2014 7:34 pm
Thu Aug 07, 2014 8:34 pm
Fri Aug 08, 2014 7:35 am
carlccfc wrote:This thread reminds me of the lyrics to a song called 'Money' by Michael Jackson.
Are you infected with the same disease
Of lust, gluttoney and greed?
Then watch the ones
With the biggest smiles
The idle jabbers...Cuz they're the backstabbers
If you know it's a lie
Then you will swear it
If you give it with guilt
Then you will bear it
If it's taking a chance
Then you will dare it
You'll do anything for money...
Fri Aug 08, 2014 8:44 am
AlwaysBBlue wrote:Hypothetical obviously.
but lets say CCFC offers you a job, high ranking. pays you...lets say...3x whatever you earn now. BUT you have to answer directly to tan
you have no say in the rebrand btw
would you take it? it would of course mean being a company man and, at any time you are working, would have to endorse the rebrand.
Fri Aug 08, 2014 8:52 am
DrDre wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:Hypothetical obviously.
but lets say CCFC offers you a job, high ranking. pays you...lets say...3x whatever you earn now. BUT you have to answer directly to tan
you have no say in the rebrand btw
would you take it? it would of course mean being a company man and, at any time you are working, would have to endorse the rebrand.
why wouldn't I take it?? I've worked for worse bosses than Tan and that was for only 1 x salary
Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:06 am
AlwaysBBlue wrote:DrDre wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:Hypothetical obviously.
but lets say CCFC offers you a job, high ranking. pays you...lets say...3x whatever you earn now. BUT you have to answer directly to tan
you have no say in the rebrand btw
would you take it? it would of course mean being a company man and, at any time you are working, would have to endorse the rebrand.
why wouldn't I take it?? I've worked for worse bosses than Tan and that was for only 1 x salary
i don't know what tan is like as a boss, its more the idea of endorsing something you don't believe in simply for cash. but (and excuse me if i'm mistaken) but you're not as vehemently against the rebrand as some others if im remembering rightly?
Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:08 am
DrDre wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:DrDre wrote:AlwaysBBlue wrote:Hypothetical obviously.
but lets say CCFC offers you a job, high ranking. pays you...lets say...3x whatever you earn now. BUT you have to answer directly to tan
you have no say in the rebrand btw
would you take it? it would of course mean being a company man and, at any time you are working, would have to endorse the rebrand.
why wouldn't I take it?? I've worked for worse bosses than Tan and that was for only 1 x salary
i don't know what tan is like as a boss, its more the idea of endorsing something you don't believe in simply for cash. but (and excuse me if i'm mistaken) but you're not as vehemently against the rebrand as some others if im remembering rightly?
You're right, I see the rebrand as a small sacrifice necessary for the survival of our club, not as the loss of 'identity' other do.
Still, do you know anyone who refuses to work for a company because they don't like it's logo / colour ??
Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:08 am
DrDre wrote:
Still, do you know anyone who refuses to work for a company because they don't like it's logo / colour ??
Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:58 pm
the man stuck to his principles and they kicked him out because of it. RESPECT Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:03 pm
Fri Aug 08, 2014 1:09 pm