Suarez ban too light!!

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

He should have an international ban, not a domestic ban as well.

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

He should have an international ban, not a domestic ban as well.

Rubbish FIFA always do domestic bans too!! Look at the Canniaga ban and that was 13 months!!!

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

He should have an international ban, not a domestic ban as well.

Rubbish FIFA always do domestic bans too!! Look at the Canniaga ban and that was 13 months!!!

Please explain to me why Liverpool should be punished for something that was nothing of their doing.

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

He should have an international ban, not a domestic ban as well.

Rubbish FIFA always do domestic bans too!! Look at the Canniaga ban and that was 13 months!!!

Please explain to me why Liverpool should be punished for something that was nothing of their doing.

Nothing to do with Liverpool its to do with Suarez, they took it upon themselves to trust him and he did it again.

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

He should have an international ban, not a domestic ban as well.

Rubbish FIFA always do domestic bans too!! Look at the Canniaga ban and that was 13 months!!!

Please explain to me why Liverpool should be punished for something that was nothing of their doing.

Nothing to do with Liverpool its to do with Suarez, they took it upon themselves to trust him and he did it again.

Of course it is to do with Liverpool, he's their player. They will suffer far more than any other party in this case.

For instance, his wage will be paid his wage by Liverpool while he carries out a suspension that had nothing to do with them. Do you think that is just?

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

He should have an international ban, not a domestic ban as well.

Rubbish FIFA always do domestic bans too!! Look at the Canniaga ban and that was 13 months!!!

Please explain to me why Liverpool should be punished for something that was nothing of their doing.

Because they are scousers!

Seriously though they clearly have not given him the help he needs. They also let him get away with diving and cheating. I have no sympathy for Liverpool FC. Probably the most vile club in the country.

Of course it is to do with Liverpool, he's their player. They will suffer far more than any other party in this case.

For instance, his wage will be paid his wage by Liverpool while he carries out a suspension that had nothing to do with them. Do you think that is just?

If they are that worried about his wage, they should sack him. It's everything to do with them, he's their employer.

Fifa would've looked at his previous actions and bans from respective Football Associations.
Given his previous bans a four month total ban is acceptable.
Had the FA of England done the correct thing when the Ivanovic incident happened then a longer ban would've surely been imposed on him this time.
Luis Saurez banned for 10 games for Biting a fellow playe, whilst Rio Ferdinand was banned for 18 months for skipping a Drugs test.

Liverpool stood by him during the Evra ordeal,They stood by him during the Ivanovic ordeal,but now they want sympathy because he has done something on an international level....

I cant imagine anyone wanting to employ a worker who has a biting history he is a disgrace to his profession.

After the 3rd time he should be banned for life. Rugby Union players have been banned up to 80 months for more serious biting.

I just think biting someone on the pitch is like punching someone, headbutting someone or going into a challenge with the intention of breaking their leg. No excuse for it. I wouldn't have a problem with any ban. f**k Suarez being the victim and treated harshly. How's about he simply didn't f*cking bite someone? Repeat offender so he clearly hasn't learned his lesson. No-one to blame but himself. Do that in Sunday League three times and you'd receive a life ban.

Suarez got off lightly. He's a disgrace to football, yet he still won't face up to what he's done. The fact that he's got Maradona supporting him speaks volumes. Cheats of the world unite!

No sympathy for Liverpool either. They know what Suarez is all about.

People say that Suarez needs help. Fair enough, but he's got to be man enough to admit that he's got a problem first.

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

He should have an international ban, not a domestic ban as well.

Rubbish FIFA always do domestic bans too!! Look at the Canniaga ban and that was 13 months!!!

Please explain to me why Liverpool should be punished for something that was nothing of their doing.

Nothing to do with Liverpool its to do with Suarez, they took it upon themselves to trust him and he did it again.

Of course it is to do with Liverpool, he's their player. They will suffer far more than any other party in this case.

For instance, his wage will be paid his wage by Liverpool while he carries out a suspension that had nothing to do with them. Do you think that is just?

Lets say, Im a van driver. Im at work and im pulled for drink driving, does that mean as it happened whilst at work I should be allowed to drive on my time and only banned from driving at work?

What would happen if you bit someone at your work?

Liverpool should sue Suarez, as he is banned from ALL football activity, surely getting paid by a football club comes into that.

Roma had to suffer during Claudio Caniggias 13 month ban so why should Liverpool get off.?

Am I the only one who thinks Suarez got off lightly..? Should have been a 6 month ban minimum!!!

He should have an international ban, not a domestic ban as well.

Rubbish FIFA always do domestic bans too!! Look at the Canniaga ban and that was 13 months!!!

Please explain to me why Liverpool should be punished for something that was nothing of their doing.

Nothing to do with Liverpool its to do with Suarez, they took it upon themselves to trust him and he did it again.

Of course it is to do with Liverpool, he's their player. They will suffer far more than any other party in this case.

For instance, his wage will be paid his wage by Liverpool while he carries out a suspension that had nothing to do with them. Do you think that is just?

Lets say, Im a van driver. Im at work and im pulled for drink driving, does that mean as it happened whilst at work I should be allowed to drive on my time and only banned from driving at work?

What would happen if you bit someone at your work?

Liverpool should sue Suarez, as he is banned from ALL football activity, surely getting paid by a football club comes into that.

perfect way of putting it!

Don't think he should have banned at all. All that running around is bound to give you an appetite, he ate the nearest thing to him which just happened to be a footballer.

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/28069689

They should extend his ban for this!

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/28069689

They should extend his ban for this!

That's like one of my old excuses