Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:14 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:22 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:24 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:41 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:46 am
BobbyBlue wrote:Worked that out ages ago roath, mario, willy wonka, what was his last one before Frenchman? It will come to me.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:48 am
RoathMagic wrote:BobbyBlue wrote:Worked that out ages ago roath, mario, willy wonka, what was his last one before Frenchman? It will come to me.
I couldn't quite put my finger on it until today.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:51 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:55 am
The Frenchman wrote:Huge news.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:58 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:11 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 10:47 am
BobbyBlue wrote:Don Vito was another one, still trying to think of his last one tho hmmm
The Frenchman wrote:Save you the trouble: mario, willy wonka, don vito and some other ones from a year ago.
I won't get this one banned though.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:01 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:02 am
paulh_85 wrote:BobbyBlue wrote:Don Vito was another one, still trying to think of his last one tho hmmm
How many accounts have you had?The Frenchman wrote:Save you the trouble: mario, willy wonka, don vito and some other ones from a year ago.
I won't get this one banned though.
Not going to sympathise with peados this time are u?
Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:03 am
The Frenchman wrote:If you could read youd understand that is not what I meant you massive f*cking tw*t.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:28 am
Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:34 am
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Someone ban the nonce sympathiser, just because you agreed that little girls deserved to be tampered with because of the way they dressed on another account doesn't mean you never said it.
Despicable slithering little worm.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:44 am
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Someone ban the nonce sympathiser, just because you agreed that little girls deserved to be tampered with because of the way they dressed on another account doesn't mean you never said it.
Despicable slithering little worm.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:45 am
RoathMagic wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Someone ban the nonce sympathiser, just because you agreed that little girls deserved to be tampered with because of the way they dressed on another account doesn't mean you never said it.
Despicable slithering little worm.
how is he allowed to post
Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:59 am
RoathMagic wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Someone ban the nonce sympathiser, just because you agreed that little girls deserved to be tampered with because of the way they dressed on another account doesn't mean you never said it.
Despicable slithering little worm.
how is he allowed to post
Sat Jun 14, 2014 12:20 pm
BobbyBlue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Someone ban the nonce sympathiser, just because you agreed that little girls deserved to be tampered with because of the way they dressed on another account doesn't mean you never said it.
Despicable slithering little worm.
how is he allowed to post
How ain't he in the nick is the question
Sat Jun 14, 2014 12:23 pm
Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:02 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Can any mids reading this explain why he is allowed here if what these chaps are saying is true, and i have no reason to doubt them.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:07 pm
Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:15 pm
The Frenchman wrote:Take it as you want.
But I was saying how ludicrous girls dress these days. Shown when I say about how katy perry has a music video playing with kids then inuendos all over the lyrics.
I clearly can't stay on here as apparently I side with paedos as shown by the wise c**t bluebird 1948
Who gives a f**k when you probably laugh at frankie boyle
Hahaha.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:20 pm
Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:27 pm
The Frenchman wrote:It might have been an attempt to try and be edgy as paul once said.
But it honestly wasnt as sinister as people make out.
I do find it funny that people jump on this because it is a recent event. Then they take the piss out of all sorts which is apparently okay.
Getting on their high horse over my comment when one guy recently said mackay was friends with clifford. Which went without abuse.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:29 pm
Sat Jun 14, 2014 5:24 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:This thread is not about football so I will put my
Partisan views aside.
I think that the poster in question is bringing this board into disrepute and reflecting badly on all who use it. Annis can't be comfortable with some of the comments which are beyond bad taste and stray into the realms of perversity.
I have nothing more to say on this matter except to thank our "arch enemy" Roathie for highlighting the issue.
Please ban the multi French guy
Sat Jun 14, 2014 5:31 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Someone ban the nonce sympathiser, just because you agreed that little girls deserved to be tampered with because of the way they dressed on another account doesn't mean you never said it.
Despicable slithering little worm.
Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:24 pm
BLUEBIRD57 wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:This thread is not about football so I will put my
Partisan views aside.
I think that the poster in question is bringing this board into disrepute and reflecting badly on all who use it. Annis can't be comfortable with some of the comments which are beyond bad taste and stray into the realms of perversity.
I have nothing more to say on this matter except to thank our "arch enemy" Roathie for highlighting the issue.
Please ban the multi French guy
In what must be the irony of the century you'd need look no further than Roathie to see that if person wants to stay on a board he can and theres not much any mod can do about it.A case of same horse/different jockey with Roathie and the Frenchman.