Thu May 15, 2014 7:46 pm
Thu May 15, 2014 7:49 pm
Thu May 15, 2014 7:58 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:The money stated barely covers the wages and the Medel signing.
Everyone knows how much the prem dishes out even before a ball was kicked - its not news.if you spend £110m+ then receiving £64m isnt particularly good news.
Thu May 15, 2014 7:58 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:The money stated barely covers the wages and the Medel signing.
Everyone knows how much the prem dishes out even before a ball was kicked - its not news.if you spend £110m+ then receiving £64m isnt particularly good news.
Thu May 15, 2014 8:32 pm
wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:The money stated barely covers the wages and the Medel signing.
Everyone knows how much the prem dishes out even before a ball was kicked - its not news.if you spend £110m+ then receiving £64m isnt particularly good news.
Roathy CCFC accountant off againyou are one sad man trolling through this forum every minute of.the day ,get a life
Thu May 15, 2014 8:56 pm
welshman19 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:The money stated barely covers the wages and the Medel signing.
Everyone knows how much the prem dishes out even before a ball was kicked - its not news.if you spend £110m+ then receiving £64m isnt particularly good news.
Roathy CCFC accountant off againyou are one sad man trolling through this forum every minute of.the day ,get a life
Thu May 15, 2014 9:29 pm
RYANBLUE wrote:Something gets printed in the shitty echo about us being in debt and off go the Tan haters, the doubters, the negative people (you know there have been plenty on here this past 12 months).
However looking at the figures on BBC of the TV revenue for City combined with the parachute payments and the picture doesnt look that bad. Yet nobody has mentioned it today?
Its positive IMO
Thu May 15, 2014 11:03 pm
Fri May 16, 2014 11:40 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:A troll for stating the obvious![]()
New one.
Fri May 16, 2014 11:43 am
Fri May 16, 2014 6:27 pm