Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 3:48 pm

What gave the people at that meeting the right to give the club and Vincent Tan the green light to go ahead with the rebrand.
I don't buy all the bollocks we were put on the spot,gun to the head ,worst day of my life bullshit.You should have simply told the club put it to the season ticket holders,end of.
I don't blame Tan i blame you lot.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 3:52 pm

redordead wrote:What gave the people at that meeting the right to give the club and Vincent Tan the green light to go ahead with the rebrand.
I don't buy all the bollocks we were put on the spot,gun to the head ,worst day of my life bullshit.You should have simply told the club put it to the season ticket holders,end of.
I don't blame Tan i blame you lot.


talk is cheap............i doubt any fan put on the spot like that would have acted differently tbh..........
it really wasnt their place to talk for us all i agree.........but they were put in that spot.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 4:50 pm

Lets hope lessons have been learnt and any future decisions like this are put to season ticket holders and never again to a select few.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 4:55 pm

Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 4:57 pm

redordead wrote:What gave the people at that meeting the right to give the club and Vincent Tan the green light to go ahead with the rebrand.
I don't buy all the bollocks we were put on the spot,gun to the head ,worst day of my life bullshit.You should have simply told the club put it to the season ticket holders,end of.
I don't blame Tan i blame you lot.

With a forum name redordead kind of makes this above post more stupid :laughing6:
Last edited by Bluebird1977 on Mon May 12, 2014 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 4:57 pm

thevoiceofreason wrote:Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.


Those 12 people did not, only 3 agreed out of 12.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 4:59 pm

thevoiceofreason wrote:Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.

It was never allowed to go to ST vote thats just it :laughing6:

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 5:01 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
thevoiceofreason wrote:Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.

It was never allowed to go to ST vote thats just it :laughing6:


It should of though Ian, I asked the club to do that and they refused.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 5:02 pm

I never assumed they gave the green light for the rebrand.

They understood the incumbent board would file for administration if the club was not taken over by Tan.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 5:03 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
thevoiceofreason wrote:Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.

It was never allowed to go to ST vote thats just it :laughing6:


It should of though Ian, I asked the club to do that and they refused.

Thats just it though so it told you and everyone else THIS WAS GOING TO HAPPEN eitherway if 3/12 was vs it in the room and no season ticket people votes so it was only going one way and there was never any intension to " Look for other investment " but people buy that total bollocks :ayatollah:
Last edited by Bluebird1977 on Mon May 12, 2014 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 5:04 pm

Quite simply those at the meeting should have refused point blank to agree or disagree and should have walked out insisting that any consultation on the subject be done via a vote of all season ticket holders.

The people in question, as has been previously stated, had no mandate from anyone.
Last edited by NJ73 on Mon May 12, 2014 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 5:05 pm

NJ73 wrote:Quite simply yhose at the meeting should have refused point blank to agree or disagree and should have walked out insisting that any consultation on the subject be done via a vote of all season ticket holders.

The people in question, as has been previously stated, had no mandate from anyone.

when will people realise this would have never happened :lol:

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 5:56 pm

NJ73 wrote:Quite simply those at the meeting should have refused point blank to agree or disagree and should have walked out insisting that any consultation on the subject be done via a vote of all season ticket holders.

The people in question, as has been previously stated, had no mandate from anyone.


Doesn't really matter if they had all walked out, the board had decided that they were happy to back Tan and the rebrand, so they could all get their grubby little hands on the cash they had put into the club. As Tan had said, Whitley told him that if he invested he could have his red :thumbup:

Re: THAT MEETING

Mon May 12, 2014 6:01 pm

NJ73 wrote:Quite simply those at the meeting should have refused point blank to agree or disagree and should have walked out insisting that any consultation on the subject be done via a vote of all season ticket holders.

The people in question, as has been previously stated, had no mandate from anyone.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: