Mon May 12, 2014 3:48 pm
Mon May 12, 2014 3:52 pm
redordead wrote:What gave the people at that meeting the right to give the club and Vincent Tan the green light to go ahead with the rebrand.
I don't buy all the bollocks we were put on the spot,gun to the head ,worst day of my life bullshit.You should have simply told the club put it to the season ticket holders,end of.
I don't blame Tan i blame you lot.
Mon May 12, 2014 4:50 pm
Mon May 12, 2014 4:55 pm
Mon May 12, 2014 4:57 pm
redordead wrote:What gave the people at that meeting the right to give the club and Vincent Tan the green light to go ahead with the rebrand.
I don't buy all the bollocks we were put on the spot,gun to the head ,worst day of my life bullshit.You should have simply told the club put it to the season ticket holders,end of.
I don't blame Tan i blame you lot.
Mon May 12, 2014 4:57 pm
thevoiceofreason wrote:Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.
Mon May 12, 2014 4:59 pm
thevoiceofreason wrote:Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.
Mon May 12, 2014 5:01 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:thevoiceofreason wrote:Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.
It was never allowed to go to ST vote thats just it
Mon May 12, 2014 5:02 pm
Mon May 12, 2014 5:03 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:thevoiceofreason wrote:Should have gone to a season ticket vote without a doubt, those 12 people royally screwed up.
It was never allowed to go to ST vote thats just it
It should of though Ian, I asked the club to do that and they refused.
Mon May 12, 2014 5:04 pm
Mon May 12, 2014 5:05 pm
NJ73 wrote:Quite simply yhose at the meeting should have refused point blank to agree or disagree and should have walked out insisting that any consultation on the subject be done via a vote of all season ticket holders.
The people in question, as has been previously stated, had no mandate from anyone.
Mon May 12, 2014 5:56 pm
NJ73 wrote:Quite simply those at the meeting should have refused point blank to agree or disagree and should have walked out insisting that any consultation on the subject be done via a vote of all season ticket holders.
The people in question, as has been previously stated, had no mandate from anyone.
Mon May 12, 2014 6:01 pm
NJ73 wrote:Quite simply those at the meeting should have refused point blank to agree or disagree and should have walked out insisting that any consultation on the subject be done via a vote of all season ticket holders.
The people in question, as has been previously stated, had no mandate from anyone.