No cash settlement does NOT mean No financial settlement!!!!

The sooner some of you Tan lovers understand this FACT the better!!!

Any reason this couldn't have been said in your other thread on the same topic?

"Why are there reports differing..?"

Any reason this couldn't have been said in your other thread on the same topic?

"Why are there reports differing..?"

because this needs to be highlighted as people who clearly dont understand the civil proceedure are jumping on the anti-Malky bandwagon far too easily.

The sooner some of you Tan lovers understand this FACT the better!!!

sooner the better anti cardiff relegation lovers get a grip............

The sooner some of you Tan lovers understand this FACT the better!!!

sooner the better anti cardiff relegation lovers get a grip............

how is that anti-cardiff..? tell me what experience do you have in Civil Law in this country..?

Keep clutching at your straws.

The sooner some of you Tan lovers understand this FACT the better!!!

sooner the better anti cardiff relegation lovers get a grip............

how is that anti-cardiff..? tell me what experience do you have in Civil Law in this country..?

if he did wrong here,he relegated us single handed before a ball was kicked............it looks terrible,most can see that........but you keep backing mr relegation..just forget the facts..just make a noise and put cotton wool in your ears...
he had lawyers recomended by the LMA ffs, experienced, yet we get the grovelling apology..
but of course..rumpole of the valleys knows better

Keep clutching at your straws.

No just learnt from my limited experience. Civil Law is not as black and white as criminal law and it can take a f*cking lifetime before it ever gets in front of a judge and during that time things can change hugely

The sooner some of you Tan lovers understand this FACT the better!!!

sooner the better anti cardiff relegation lovers get a grip............

how is that anti-cardiff..? tell me what experience do you have in Civil Law in this country..?

if he did wrong here,he relegated us single handed before a ball was kicked............it looks terrible,most can see that........but you keep backing mr relegation..just forget the facts..just make a noise and put cotton wool in your ears...
he had lawyers recomended by the LMA ffs, experienced, yet we get the grovelling apology..
but of course..rumpole of the valleys knows better

You really dont have a clue of Civil practices do you

Keep clutching at your straws.

No just learnt from my limited experience. Civil Law is not as black and white as criminal law and it can take a f*cking lifetime before it ever gets in front of a judge and during that time things can change hugely

It's in black and white now. No cash settlement Malkys paying his own legal fees.

Maybe they settled in magic beans

Adam this smacks of guilt on both sides. I spoke to someone employed at the club a few weeks back who said in their opinion Malky could be looking at a stretch. Strange how it's turned out cos if the evidence was as strong as I was led to believe there is no way this would've been settled out of court. Tan always said that he'd reveal the truth when he could and from what I've heard it was swaying heavily in his corner. Malky comes out squeaky clean and Tan has no reason to divulge. CHECKMATE

Last edited by Jonesyccfc1 on Fri May 09, 2014 11:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Keep clutching at your straws.

No just learnt from my limited experience. Civil Law is not as black and white as criminal law and it can take a f*cking lifetime before it ever gets in front of a judge and during that time things can change hugely

It's in black and white now. No cash settlement Malkys paying his own legal fees.

Maybe they settled in magic beans

Shares..?

Keep clutching at your straws.

No just learnt from my limited experience. Civil Law is not as black and white as criminal law and it can take a f*cking lifetime before it ever gets in front of a judge and during that time things can change hugely

It's in black and white now. No cash settlement Malkys paying his own legal fees.

Maybe they settled in magic beans

Shares..?

It could also mean NO financial settlement.

Keep clutching at your straws.

No just learnt from my limited experience. Civil Law is not as black and white as criminal law and it can take a f*cking lifetime before it ever gets in front of a judge and during that time things can change hugely

It's in black and white now. No cash settlement Malkys paying his own legal fees.

Maybe they settled in magic beans

Shares..?

It could also mean NO financial settlement.

But people on here have been screaming 'No Cash Settlement' rather than 'No Financial Settlement' hence why I started this topic.

Keep clutching at your straws.

No just learnt from my limited experience. Civil Law is not as black and white as criminal law and it can take a f*cking lifetime before it ever gets in front of a judge and during that time things can change hugely

It's in black and white now. No cash settlement Malkys paying his own legal fees.

Maybe they settled in magic beans

Shares..?

Yes let's accuse a guy of spying on our team selection one week then give him shares the next f*cking moron

Keep clutching at your straws.

No just learnt from my limited experience. Civil Law is not as black and white as criminal law and it can take a f*cking lifetime before it ever gets in front of a judge and during that time things can change hugely

It's in black and white now. No cash settlement Malkys paying his own legal fees.

Maybe they settled in magic beans

Shares..?

It could also mean NO financial settlement.

But people on here have been screaming 'No Cash Settlement' rather than 'No Financial Settlement' hence why I started this topic.

So you accept that it could be NO financial settlement then.

Adam this smacks of guilt on both sides. I spoke to someone employed at the club a few weeks back who said in their opinion Malky could be looking at a stretch. Strange how it's turned out cos if the evidence was as strong as I was led to believe there is no way this would've been settled out of court. Tan always said that he'd reveal the truth when he could and from what I've heard it was swaying heavily in his corner. Malky comes out squeaky clean and Tan has no reason to divulge. CHECKMATE

That may well be the case but normally with Civil matters all parties are encouraged to come to an agreement before court because quiet frankly no party can be 100% on whether or not they will win the case. As a pervious legal adviser said to me once 'It depends if they had sex the night before' and they alsosaid 'If a Civil legal adviser told you that you would win the case then they are lying because its NEVER 100%'

The sooner some of you Tan lovers understand this FACT the better!!!

sooner the better anti cardiff relegation lovers get a grip............

how is that anti-cardiff..? tell me what experience do you have in Civil Law in this country..?

if he did wrong here,he relegated us single handed before a ball was kicked............it looks terrible,most can see that........but you keep backing mr relegation..just forget the facts..just make a noise and put cotton wool in your ears...
he had lawyers recomended by the LMA ffs, experienced, yet we get the grovelling apology..
but of course..rumpole of the valleys knows better

You really dont have a clue of Civil practices do you

no..lets try you PRETEND you know.......it little knowledge is a dangerous thing Rumpole

The sooner some of you Tan lovers understand this FACT the better!!!

sooner the better anti cardiff relegation lovers get a grip............

how is that anti-cardiff..? tell me what experience do you have in Civil Law in this country..?

if he did wrong here,he relegated us single handed before a ball was kicked............it looks terrible,most can see that........but you keep backing mr relegation..just forget the facts..just make a noise and put cotton wool in your ears...
he had lawyers recomended by the LMA ffs, experienced, yet we get the grovelling apology..
but of course..rumpole of the valleys knows better

You really dont have a clue of Civil practices do you

no..lets try you PRETEND you know.......it little knowledge is a dangerous thing Rumpole

So I dont have customers who don't pay their bills then do I..?

Adam this smacks of guilt on both sides. I spoke to someone employed at the club a few weeks back who said in their opinion Malky could be looking at a stretch. Strange how it's turned out cos if the evidence was as strong as I was led to believe there is no way this would've been settled out of court. Tan always said that he'd reveal the truth when he could and from what I've heard it was swaying heavily in his corner. Malky comes out squeaky clean and Tan has no reason to divulge. CHECKMATE

That may well be the case but normally with Civil matters all parties are encouraged to come to an agreement before court because quiet frankly no party can be 100% on whether or not they will win the case. As a pervious legal adviser said to me once 'It depends if they had sex the night before' and they alsosaid 'If a Civil legal adviser told you that you would win the case then they are lying because its NEVER 100%'

nothing is 100% in a court.........but there is a huge difference in having a very strong case.......and being advised to cut your loses and give a cringey apology in which you big up someone you most likely detest...........
like any 1st year GCSE law student might advise you.............

Adam this smacks of guilt on both sides. I spoke to someone employed at the club a few weeks back who said in their opinion Malky could be looking at a stretch. Strange how it's turned out cos if the evidence was as strong as I was led to believe there is no way this would've been settled out of court. Tan always said that he'd reveal the truth when he could and from what I've heard it was swaying heavily in his corner. Malky comes out squeaky clean and Tan has no reason to divulge. CHECKMATE

That may well be the case but normally with Civil matters all parties are encouraged to come to an agreement before court because quiet frankly no party can be 100% on whether or not they will win the case. As a pervious legal adviser said to me once 'It depends if they had sex the night before' and they alsosaid 'If a Civil legal adviser told you that you would win the case then they are lying because its NEVER 100%'

nothing is 100% in a court.........but there is a huge difference in having a very strong case.......and being advised to cut your loses and give a cringey apology in which you big up someone you most likely detest...........
like any 1st year GCSE law student might advise you.............

You need to show the Judge that both sides have tried to settle beforehand and if one side is seen as not being flexible it can heavy go against them no matter how strong their case is.