Fri May 09, 2014 5:17 am
Fri May 09, 2014 6:54 am
Fri May 09, 2014 7:03 am
cendl blue wrote:He could be a good fit next to him that's the thing. For his weaknesses are leading and organising. whilst listening to jacks these are the strengths of williams. Caulker has good footballing ability but his still not the finished article and needs a more experienced player alongside him. I was hoping for more from him but he has played with poor players around him for most of the season. You could do a lot worse than him and hope you do. Wouldn't expected anything different to come out of James gob though.
Fri May 09, 2014 7:19 am
Fri May 09, 2014 7:30 am
Fri May 09, 2014 7:41 am
Fri May 09, 2014 9:21 am
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:cendl blue wrote:He could be a good fit next to him that's the thing. For his weaknesses are leading and organising. whilst listening to jacks these are the strengths of williams. Caulker has good footballing ability but his still not the finished article and needs a more experienced player alongside him. I was hoping for more from him but he has played with poor players around him for most of the season. You could do a lot worse than him and hope you do. Wouldn't expected anything different to come out of James gob though.
That old chestnut![]()
Fed up of hearing the excuse about players around them being used for Caulker and Medel.
Caulker at fault for first 2 goals last weekend, f**k all to do with the players around him. Been at fault for loads of goals this season but hey lets not blame Caulker he cost 8m he must be a good player.
People just dont want to face up to the facts that Malky blew an absolute fortune on players who simply are just not good enough.
Caulker to Liverpool so the papers say. They must be having a laugh. Hes not a champions league player in a million years.
Fri May 09, 2014 9:22 am
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:cendl blue wrote:He could be a good fit next to him that's the thing. For his weaknesses are leading and organising. whilst listening to jacks these are the strengths of williams. Caulker has good footballing ability but his still not the finished article and needs a more experienced player alongside him. I was hoping for more from him but he has played with poor players around him for most of the season. You could do a lot worse than him and hope you do. Wouldn't expected anything different to come out of James gob though.
That old chestnut![]()
Fed up of hearing the excuse about players around them being used for Caulker and Medel.
Caulker at fault for first 2 goals last weekend, f**k all to do with the players around him. Been at fault for loads of goals this season but hey lets not blame Caulker he cost 8m he must be a good player.
People just dont want to face up to the facts that Malky blew an absolute fortune on players who simply are just not good enough.
Caulker to Liverpool so the papers say. They must be having a laugh. Hes not a champions league player in a million years.
Fri May 09, 2014 10:40 am
Fri May 09, 2014 7:38 pm
scooby1973 wrote:Liverpool and spurs want him ? But not good enough for the jacks,.
Fri May 09, 2014 7:44 pm
Fusilier52 wrote:scooby1973 wrote:Liverpool and spurs want him ? But not good enough for the jacks,.
Yes , why spend £6,000,000 on a player who's no better than whats already at the club .Amat , Bartley . Flores . Williams in no particular order are better if not equal to what Caulker offers at the moment . He was thrust into a Captains position trying to play his own game whilst trying to organise lesser players around him . He's good but we've moved on and so should he imo.
Sat May 10, 2014 6:37 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Fusilier52 wrote:scooby1973 wrote:Liverpool and spurs want him ? But not good enough for the jacks,.
Yes , why spend £6,000,000 on a player who's no better than whats already at the club .Amat , Bartley . Flores . Williams in no particular order are better if not equal to what Caulker offers at the moment . He was thrust into a Captains position trying to play his own game whilst trying to organise lesser players around him . He's good but we've moved on and so should he imo.
Amat, Flores & Bartley...![]()
![]()
He should move on? Are you suggesting that he hasn't? What sound bites have come from him that makes you think he hasn't moved on from a loan spell at Swansea?!
Sat May 10, 2014 7:28 am
Fusilier52 wrote:scooby1973 wrote:Liverpool and spurs want him ? But not good enough for the jacks,.
Yes , why spend £6,000,000 on a player who's no better than whats already at the club .Amat , Bartley . Flores . Williams in no particular order are better if not equal to what Caulker offers at the moment . He was thrust into a Captains position trying to play his own game whilst trying to organise lesser players around him . He's good but we've moved on and so should he imo.
Sat May 10, 2014 7:43 am
Sat May 10, 2014 9:47 am
Sat May 10, 2014 9:53 am
Fusilier52 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Fusilier52 wrote:scooby1973 wrote:Liverpool and spurs want him ? But not good enough for the jacks,.
Yes , why spend £6,000,000 on a player who's no better than whats already at the club .Amat , Bartley . Flores . Williams in no particular order are better if not equal to what Caulker offers at the moment . He was thrust into a Captains position trying to play his own game whilst trying to organise lesser players around him . He's good but we've moved on and so should he imo.
Amat, Flores & Bartley...![]()
![]()
He should move on? Are you suggesting that he hasn't? What sound bites have come from him that makes you think he hasn't moved on from a loan spell at Swansea?!
Its all about opinions , I've watched all 4 players , have you ?