So Malky wouldng have kept us up either

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

There's no way whatsoever to predict how many more points Malky would have gotten for all we know we could have less points than now, it's all ifs and buts

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

There's no way whatsoever to predict how many more points Malky would have gotten for all we know we could have less points than now, it's all ifs and buts

Yes, but the butts always keep saying, and this is the only if. All else is speculating fantasy, and with all probability

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

Well I am afraid my little malkyites

Quality.

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

You should mail this to the echo!

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

There's no way whatsoever to predict how many more points Malky would have gotten for all we know we could have less points than now, it's all ifs and buts

the point has been made about 6 trillion times that Malkys points ratio would have kept us up........the point being made here.......is even had that ratio continued we would go down.........

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

There's no way whatsoever to predict how many more points Malky would have gotten for all we know we could have less points than now, it's all ifs and buts

the point has been made about 6 trillion times that Malkys points ratio would have kept us up........the point being made here.......is even had that ratio continued we would go down.........

Thats EXACTLY the point being made here

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

Just look through the fixtures we had as if it's the start of the season and try to work out where you think the team should get 40ish points from for survival. Nobody would predict more points from our first 19 fixtures compared to second 19 because the fixture list was so much harder.

I thought we could aim for 3 points at home to west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland, west ham, Norwich, villa, hull, Fulham, palace and stoke
I aimed for draws at home to Newcastle and Swansea and away at west ham, hull, Fulham, Norwich, villa, palace, Swansea, west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland and Newcastle.
I thought we would lose all our games against top seven and away at Stoke.

If you break this down it is 14 points up for grabs in first 18 fixtures and 29 in last 20 fixtures.

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

I rest my case

:sleepy2:

Wake up Kevin, its time for school.

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

Just look through the fixtures we had as if it's the start of the season and try to work out where you think the team should get 40ish points from for survival. Nobody would predict more points from our first 19 fixtures compared to second 19 because the fixture list was so much harder.

I thought we could aim for 3 points at home to west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland, west ham, Norwich, villa, hull, Fulham, palace and stoke
I aimed for draws at home to Newcastle and Swansea and away at west ham, hull, Fulham, Norwich, villa, palace, Swansea, west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland and Newcastle.
I thought we would lose all our games against top seven and away at Stoke.

If you break this down it is 14 points up for grabs in first 18 fixtures and 29 in last 20 fixtures.

Dear lord

When the fixture list came out I predicted Malky would be sacked by Christmas because we had such a tough first half of the season that I thought we would be bottom and so psychologically down that we wouldn't be able to improve second half. It actually turned out we were doing far better than expected when he was sacked.

As I have said previously I've got no problem with tan sacking Malky as long as whoever came in kept us competitive but that didn't happen.

It actually turned out we were doing far better than expected when he was sacked.

In your fantasy world maybe.

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

Just look through the fixtures we had as if it's the start of the season and try to work out where you think the team should get 40ish points from for survival. Nobody would predict more points from our first 19 fixtures compared to second 19 because the fixture list was so much harder.

I thought we could aim for 3 points at home to west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland, west ham, Norwich, villa, hull, Fulham, palace and stoke
I aimed for draws at home to Newcastle and Swansea and away at west ham, hull, Fulham, Norwich, villa, palace, Swansea, west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland and Newcastle.
I thought we would lose all our games against top seven and away at Stoke.

If you break this down it is 14 points up for grabs in first 18 fixtures and 29 in last 20 fixtures.

Dear lord

I assume you thought we would lose heavily at home to west ham, hull and palace and that we should have got more from home games against Arsenal, Everton, Spurs and Man Utd. Dear lord indeed

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

Just look through the fixtures we had as if it's the start of the season and try to work out where you think the team should get 40ish points from for survival. Nobody would predict more points from our first 19 fixtures compared to second 19 because the fixture list was so much harder.

I thought we could aim for 3 points at home to west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland, west ham, Norwich, villa, hull, Fulham, palace and stoke
I aimed for draws at home to Newcastle and Swansea and away at west ham, hull, Fulham, Norwich, villa, palace, Swansea, west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland and Newcastle.
I thought we would lose all our games against top seven and away at Stoke.

If you break this down it is 14 points up for grabs in first 18 fixtures and 29 in last 20 fixtures.

Dear lord

I assume you thought we would lose heavily at home to west ham, hull and palace and that we should have got more from home games against Arsenal, Everton, Spurs and Man Utd. Dear lord indeed

I didnt think we would go away to West Ham, Palace, Villa, Stoke and Norwich and fail to create a chance.

Malkys teams are usually fucked by February, this season they were fucked by November so quite how you think we would have reversed the slide of being cut adrift on 14 points at Xmas to end up on 43 points I dont know.

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

Just look through the fixtures we had as if it's the start of the season and try to work out where you think the team should get 40ish points from for survival. Nobody would predict more points from our first 19 fixtures compared to second 19 because the fixture list was so much harder.

I thought we could aim for 3 points at home to west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland, west ham, Norwich, villa, hull, Fulham, palace and stoke
I aimed for draws at home to Newcastle and Swansea and away at west ham, hull, Fulham, Norwich, villa, palace, Swansea, west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland and Newcastle.
I thought we would lose all our games against top seven and away at Stoke.

If you break this down it is 14 points up for grabs in first 18 fixtures and 29 in last 20 fixtures.

Dear lord

I assume you thought we would lose heavily at home to west ham, hull and palace and that we should have got more from home games against Arsenal, Everton, Spurs and Man Utd. Dear lord indeed

I didnt think we would go away to West Ham, Palace, Villa, Stoke and Norwich and fail to create a chance.

Malkys teams are usually fucked by February, this season they were fucked by November so quite how you think we would have reversed the slide of being cut adrift on 14 points at Xmas to end up on 43 points I dont know.

Which is why I predicted he would be sacked and a better man for the job brought in. Unfortunately the second part of the sentence didn't happen.

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

Just look through the fixtures we had as if it's the start of the season and try to work out where you think the team should get 40ish points from for survival. Nobody would predict more points from our first 19 fixtures compared to second 19 because the fixture list was so much harder.

I thought we could aim for 3 points at home to west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland, west ham, Norwich, villa, hull, Fulham, palace and stoke
I aimed for draws at home to Newcastle and Swansea and away at west ham, hull, Fulham, Norwich, villa, palace, Swansea, west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland and Newcastle.
I thought we would lose all our games against top seven and away at Stoke.

If you break this down it is 14 points up for grabs in first 18 fixtures and 29 in last 20 fixtures.

Dear lord

I assume you thought we would lose heavily at home to west ham, hull and palace and that we should have got more from home games against Arsenal, Everton, Spurs and Man Utd. Dear lord indeed

I didnt think we would go away to West Ham, Palace, Villa, Stoke and Norwich and fail to create a chance.

Malkys teams are usually fucked by February, this season they were fucked by November so quite how you think we would have reversed the slide of being cut adrift on 14 points at Xmas to end up on 43 points I dont know.

Which is why I predicted he would be sacked and a better man for the job brought in. Unfortunately the second part of the sentence didn't happen.

Did you predict these results before or after we blew 35m on utter guff?

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

Just look through the fixtures we had as if it's the start of the season and try to work out where you think the team should get 40ish points from for survival. Nobody would predict more points from our first 19 fixtures compared to second 19 because the fixture list was so much harder.

I thought we could aim for 3 points at home to west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland, west ham, Norwich, villa, hull, Fulham, palace and stoke
I aimed for draws at home to Newcastle and Swansea and away at west ham, hull, Fulham, Norwich, villa, palace, Swansea, west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland and Newcastle.
I thought we would lose all our games against top seven and away at Stoke.

If you break this down it is 14 points up for grabs in first 18 fixtures and 29 in last 20 fixtures.

Dear lord

I assume you thought we would lose heavily at home to west ham, hull and palace and that we should have got more from home games against Arsenal, Everton, Spurs and Man Utd. Dear lord indeed

I didnt think we would go away to West Ham, Palace, Villa, Stoke and Norwich and fail to create a chance.

Malkys teams are usually fucked by February, this season they were fucked by November so quite how you think we would have reversed the slide of being cut adrift on 14 points at Xmas to end up on 43 points I dont know.

Which is why I predicted he would be sacked and a better man for the job brought in. Unfortunately the second part of the sentence didn't happen.

Did you predict these results before or after we blew 35m on utter guff?

Independently, predicted as if it was any newly promoted team looking to get 40 points.

At no point on this thread have I said Malky would keep us up. All I have said is that when Malky was sacked I believe the team were over performing. Ole's reign has been an abject failure and someone else should have been brought in who like Pulis at Palace could have taken advantage of the points on offer in the second half of the season.

I'm not a Malky fan, just think Ole is crap compared to him.

I agree with the reply above but before the season started I predicted where our points should come from. If everything went to my plan I thought we could get to 43 points as an absolute maximum. However, I predicted we would only get 14 points from the 18 games Malky was in charge and a maximum of 29 points from the last 20 games.

Malky got 17 points which is 21% more than I thought was possible.
We got 13 points from the other games which is only 45% of what I thought was possible.

So in my opinion Malky managed to get the team to over perform by 21% where as Ole was responsible for a team performing at less than 50% of what I thought they were capable of achieving.

That's why for me Ole has to go.

got to ask..how come a Malky team gets more points second half of season?

his record is the opposite

Just look through the fixtures we had as if it's the start of the season and try to work out where you think the team should get 40ish points from for survival. Nobody would predict more points from our first 19 fixtures compared to second 19 because the fixture list was so much harder.

I thought we could aim for 3 points at home to west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland, west ham, Norwich, villa, hull, Fulham, palace and stoke
I aimed for draws at home to Newcastle and Swansea and away at west ham, hull, Fulham, Norwich, villa, palace, Swansea, west Brom, Southampton, Sunderland and Newcastle.
I thought we would lose all our games against top seven and away at Stoke.

If you break this down it is 14 points up for grabs in first 18 fixtures and 29 in last 20 fixtures.

Dear lord

I assume you thought we would lose heavily at home to west ham, hull and palace and that we should have got more from home games against Arsenal, Everton, Spurs and Man Utd. Dear lord indeed

I didnt think we would go away to West Ham, Palace, Villa, Stoke and Norwich and fail to create a chance.

Malkys teams are usually fucked by February, this season they were fucked by November so quite how you think we would have reversed the slide of being cut adrift on 14 points at Xmas to end up on 43 points I dont know.

Which is why I predicted he would be sacked and a better man for the job brought in. Unfortunately the second part of the sentence didn't happen.

Did you predict these results before or after we blew 35m on utter guff?

Independently, predicted as if it was any newly promoted team looking to get 40 points.

At no point on this thread have I said Malky would keep us up. All I have said is that when Malky was sacked I believe the team were over performing. Ole's reign has been an abject failure and someone else should have been brought in who like Pulis at Palace could have taken advantage of the points on offer in the second half of the season.

I'm not a Malky fan, just think Ole is crap compared to him.

Over performing at the time of his sacking He had 1 win in his last 9 games.

Sir Alex Ferguson would have struggled to take 29 points after Malky was sacked with the guff he had at his disposal.

No offence but those predictions are laughable. You didnt have the team down for a win until December (West Brom) and then expect us to go on and win the rest of our home games except for Liverpool and Chelsea

Thats why football is played on grass not paper.

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

We all know that you hate Malky and are still pro Tan so I view your post as the ramblings of someone who is just trying to justify his position. What you fail to take into consideration is the fact that Malky was being undermined at every turn many weeks before he was sacked and was not given the cooperation or resources to enable him to do the job to the best of his ability. I am confident that if Malky did have the full support of Tan and had been given extra funds then we would have gained the necessary points to survive. In the last few weeks of his reign, Malky had to cope with intense media speculation and despite assurances from the club that he had their full support (which we all know was a complete lie) Malky not only had to deal with putting a competitive team out but a huge amount of his energy was given to watching his back and dealing with the campaign to oust him. I cannot say with any certainty how many points this undermining by Tan cost us but you would be extremely naive to think that we did not lose any points as a result. Your figures therefore are meaningless but I can say with complete certainty that Malky could not have done any worse than what we have been left with. I would have more respect for posters like you if you admitted that the rebrand is the complete failure and that the replacing of Malky at a critical time of the season was a mistake. You backed the wrong horse and now are left feeling foolish so at least have the decency to admit it rather than try and convince us you were somehow justified in your choice.

You are completely missing my point, hopefully deliberately rather than through mental capacity. I am predicting targets to pick up points, basically saying try to win at home against worst 10 clubs and draw away against worst 10 clubs to get to 40 points. The fixture list means that this is really imbalanced between first half of season and second because we are at home to most of worst 10 clubs in second half.

Therefore it was going to be a huge effort for any manager to keep us up and I don't believe either of the two we employed were up to it. Hull for example had more home games against bottom clubs in the first half of the season. However, if you just judge each manager we did have against that target of 3 points at home 1 away to worst 10 clubs then Malky was above his target and Ole was less than halfway to the target.

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

We all know that you hate Malky and are still pro Tan so I view your post as the ramblings of someone who is just trying to justify his position. .

I stopped reading your jibber jabber after this point.

Not liking Malky has f**k ALL to do with supporting Tan they are two seperate issues.

I f*cking hate Tan for what he has done with the rebrand and as a result I have not renewed, and wont be until hes gone or we return to blue.

Your 50 years old, start acting it you great big whopper.

You are completely missing my point, hopefully deliberately rather than through mental capacity. I am predicting targets to pick up points, basically saying try to win at home against worst 10 clubs and draw away against worst 10 clubs to get to 40 points. The fixture list means that this is really imbalanced between first half of season and second because we are at home to most of worst 10 clubs in second half.

Therefore it was going to be a huge effort for any manager to keep us up and I don't believe either of the two we employed were up to it. Hull for example had more home games against bottom clubs in the first half of the season. However, if you just judge each manager we did have against that target of 3 points at home 1 away to worst 10 clubs then Malky was above his target and Ole was less than halfway to the target.

As I told you previously football is played on grass not paper.

If it was as black & white as your making out, we would be down the bookies bashing them every single weekend.

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

We all know that you hate Malky and are still pro Tan so I view your post as the ramblings of someone who is just trying to justify his position. .

I stopped reading your jibber jabber after this point.

Not liking Malky has f**k ALL to do with supporting Tan they are two seperate issues.

I f*cking hate Tan for what he has done with the rebrand and as a result I have not renewed, and wont be until hes gone or we return to blue.

Your 50 years old, start acting it you great big whopper.

I'm not 50 years old at at all so another example of you inventing facts to suit your agenda . You claim not to support Tan but did support him when he undermined Malky for weeks then sacked him which ultimately cost us the points needed to have a chance of keeping us up. To replace Malky when Tan did was a huge mistake which has relegated us. Like I said you supported this decision and instead of now admitting it was a wrong move, you try and point the finger at Malky in order to mask your poor judgement. Well I must point out you are fooling no one.

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

We all know that you hate Malky and are still pro Tan so I view your post as the ramblings of someone who is just trying to justify his position. .

I stopped reading your jibber jabber after this point.

Not liking Malky has f**k ALL to do with supporting Tan they are two seperate issues.

I f*cking hate Tan for what he has done with the rebrand and as a result I have not renewed, and wont be until hes gone or we return to blue.

Your 50 years old, start acting it you great big whopper.

I'm not 50 years old at at all so another example of you inventing facts to suit your agenda . You claim not to support Tan but did support him when he undermined Malky for weeks then sacked him which ultimately cost us the points needed to have a chance of keeping us up. To replace Malky when Tan did was a huge mistake which has relegated us. Like I said you supported this decision and instead of now admitting it was a wrong move, you try and point the finger at Malky in order to mask your poor judgement. Well I must point out you are fooling no one.

100% I support his decision to sack Sir Hoofball that doesnt mean I am Pro-Tan as you put it you f*cking idiot. it just means I agree with one of his decisions.

With Sunderland winning tonight that means 17th will now finish with at least 36 points.

Malkys ratio of points we were told would have lead us to safety.

"The football wasnt pretty but we were picking up enough points to keep us up"

Well I am afraid my little malkyites that if you want to play the ratio game Malky finishes on 36 points and a very poor goal difference so even if WBA dont pick up a point on Sunday theoretically we would still go down on goal difference.

We all know that you hate Malky and are still pro Tan so I view your post as the ramblings of someone who is just trying to justify his position. .

I stopped reading your jibber jabber after this point.

Not liking Malky has f**k ALL to do with supporting Tan they are two seperate issues.

I f*cking hate Tan for what he has done with the rebrand and as a result I have not renewed, and wont be until hes gone or we return to blue.

Your 50 years old, start acting it you great big whopper.

I'm not 50 years old at at all so another example of you inventing facts to suit your agenda . You claim not to support Tan but did support him when he undermined Malky for weeks then sacked him which ultimately cost us the points needed to have a chance of keeping us up. To replace Malky when Tan did was a huge mistake which has relegated us. Like I said you supported this decision and instead of now admitting it was a wrong move, you try and point the finger at Malky in order to mask your poor judgement. Well I must point out you are fooling no one.

100% I support his decision to sack Sir Hoofball that doesnt mean I am Pro-Tan as you put it you f*cking idiot. it just means I agree with one of his decisions.

You supported Tan in undermining and getting rid Malky which has cost us relegation. You are now looking for someone to blame to justify your poor (or foolish) choice. Perhaps admitting you got it wrong may be the start of your healing process. Like I said you are fooling no one.