Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Style over Subtance debate....

Thu May 01, 2014 9:21 am

Everyone is talking about the Chavs tactics lately "parking the bus" to get results, and whether negativity catches up with you and bites you in the ass eventually (i.e. last night).

I think this is worth debating for our club mainly because this season is a perfect example. We were defensive and averaged a point a game in the first half of the season but were painful to watch, and gone for goals in the second half of the season averaged less than a point a game and has been painful to watch (naiive, fool hardy, whatever you want to call it, it hasn't been good enough.)

I'm all for losing if the team show some fight and give it a go, but what would you rather see?

A) sit back, soak it up and hit people on the break or
B) play basketball football and say we'll score try to score 3 today so if you score 4 then fair enough.

(Either way hasn't worked for us this season but I'm curious to see what people think. I think I'm siding with results at all costs regardless of style but I can see both sides - especially as we have tried both this season and failed on all counts!!!)

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Thu May 01, 2014 10:17 pm

Pay good money to watch us, I am happy to allow such defensive tactics if we got the players and energy to do it only for some games but when you do it on constant repeat with no other style or tactics every game then it gets boring.

Malky will never succeed as a manager unless he works on different styles and tactics. Sadly he has a great personality and speaks well in conferences, that's it in a nutshell.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Thu May 01, 2014 10:55 pm

We were not a counter attacking side under Malky. Counter attacking football is played with pace with defensive organisation, not with a 5'9 striker up on his own and 10 players behind the halfway line.

Palace play counter attacking football, 2 DM's to sit while wingers offer outlets to break quickly into space while they have a striker who can win the ball in the air and bring others into play. Chelsea did similar against Liverpool, their style was nothing like ours.

I have nothing wrong with counter attacking football, I mean, who wasn't impressed watching Bayern and Madrid the other day? (Not saying we could play like that) That was how to use counter attacking effectively with players disciplined and hard to break down while having pace on the wings. I don't mind us playing counter attack or trying to grind out a point against tougher teams (See Everton at home) but every game? After spending 50 odd million on players? That's just negative and holding up the white flag before you've even started. Hell, we were playing like that despite having the best squad in the Championship last season.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Thu May 01, 2014 11:20 pm

Got no problem with gritting out results in the Champ but it's not effective in the Premier League. I expected better football with the money spent as well, you change your game when you get promoted otherwise you get caught out

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 8:57 am

DandoCCFC wrote:Pay good money to watch us, I am happy to allow such defensive tactics if we got the players and energy to do it only for some games but when you do it on constant repeat with no other style or tactics every game then it gets boring.

Malky will never succeed as a manager unless he works on different styles and tactics. Sadly he has a great personality and speaks well in conferences, that's it in a nutshell.


Are you real?.

We play long balls all over the place at times now.

The good football under Ole is a myth.

I haven't been entertained at the CCS for a longggggggggggggggggggg time.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 9:12 am

Mario wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:Pay good money to watch us, I am happy to allow such defensive tactics if we got the players and energy to do it only for some games but when you do it on constant repeat with no other style or tactics every game then it gets boring.

Malky will never succeed as a manager unless he works on different styles and tactics. Sadly he has a great personality and speaks well in conferences, that's it in a nutshell.


Are you real?.

We play long balls all over the place at times now.

The good football under Ole is a myth.

I haven't been entertained at the CCS for a longggggggggggggggggggg time.


Have you ever played football? Do you understand the game?

We are trying to get it down and play through midfield and the full backs bombing on. Unfortunately in this division we havent got as much quality as is required and so when we lose the ball we are getting punished but to suggest we are playing a long ball game is absurd.

The last time Turner and Taylor played at home to Palace both Caulker and Medel had a pop at them, Turner especially (Who then went into an incredible sulk) because they kept knocking it long and OGS said after the game there were people not following instructions.

It doesnt take a genius to work out who he was talking about especially as they were both dropped next game.

More long balls under OGS than Malky. Get a grip you clown. You make a fool of yourself every time you try and talk football.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 9:26 am

Fair enough we are trying to play better football, but I'd rather have a more organised team tbh.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 9:29 am

Mario wrote:Fair enough we are trying to play better football, but I'd rather have a more organised team tbh.



fair play you havent got a scooby-doo about football have you! :lol:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 9:36 am

paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:Fair enough we are trying to play better football, but I'd rather have a more organised team tbh.



fair play you havent got a scooby-doo about football have you! :lol:


Why is that?. I'd rather have a organised team than one which tries to play good football but can't because it doesn't understand the basics of football, the fact you have to defend properly.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 9:51 am

DandoCCFC wrote:
Malky will never succeed as a manager


Image

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 9:57 am

Mario wrote:
paulh_85 wrote:
Mario wrote:Fair enough we are trying to play better football, but I'd rather have a more organised team tbh.



fair play you havent got a scooby-doo about football have you! :lol:


Why is that?. I'd rather have a organised team than one which tries to play good football but can't because it doesn't understand the basics of football, the fact you have to defend properly.


We were losing under Malky, we are losing under OGS. At least we get to cheer some goals under Ole.

Simple facts are we have a championship squad which is not good enough for this division.

Beggars belief when you consider weve spent 50m this season.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 9:57 am

The stats show that we are attacking and controlling the game more under ole. All we need now is a decent striker and defence.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 9:59 am

We spent basically the same amount of money as Norwich.

Shit management is the reason we are down.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:00 am

Mario wrote:We spent basically the same amount of money as Norwich.

Shit management is the reason we are down.



did we ?


having said that, they spend awfully and are also going down as well :lol:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:01 am

We spent 35 they spent 30.

But hey, I don't add bonuses to fit an agenda.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:04 am

Mario wrote:We spent 35 they spent 30.

But hey, I don't add bonuses to fit an agenda.


I agree malky and hougthon were garbage in the transfer market, spot on fella :thumbright:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:05 am

Mario wrote:We spent basically the same amount of money as Norwich.

Shit management is the reason we are down.


No we didnt :lol: Norwich havent spent nowhere near what we spent plus had a better squad than us before any spending having been in the Prem for 2 years. Not a great example either considering they are also getting relegated. :lol:

You really are clueless :lol:

I do agree though that shit management is the reason we are going down. Shit management of 40m quid by Malky.

Agreed. :thumbup:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:06 am

Kenfig Blue wrote:
Mario wrote:We spent 35 they spent 30.

But hey, I don't add bonuses to fit an agenda.


I agree malky and hougthon were garbage in the transfer market, spot on fella :thumbright:


Ye, him, mackay and solksjaer have been able to do f**k all even with talented squads.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:07 am

Mario wrote:
Kenfig Blue wrote:
Mario wrote:We spent 35 they spent 30.

But hey, I don't add bonuses to fit an agenda.


I agree malky and hougthon were garbage in the transfer market, spot on fella :thumbright:


Ye, him, mackay and solksjaer have been able to do f**k all even with talented squads.



thats assuming we have a talented squad :lol:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:08 am

I think we have a good enough squad.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:09 am

Mario wrote:
Kenfig Blue wrote:
Mario wrote:We spent 35 they spent 30.

But hey, I don't add bonuses to fit an agenda.


I agree malky and hougthon were garbage in the transfer market, spot on fella :thumbright:


Ye, him, mackay and solksjaer have been able to do f**k all even with talented squads.


Championship squad with caulker and Medel you mean.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:09 am

Norwich have spent 26m
Cardiff have spent 45m (Including OGS signings before I am accused of bias)

Nearly double :lol:

And both not good enough to stay up.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 am

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Norwich have spent 26m
Cardiff have spent 45m (Including OGS signings before I am accused of bias)

Nearly double :lol:

And both not good enough to stay up.


We spent 35 million under mackay.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 am

Mario wrote:I think we have a good enough squad.


You think Taylore and Gunnarson are "class" and good enough so your not the best judge of player lets be fair

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 am

Actually I lie, we spent 35 million including solksjaers signings.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:11 am

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Mario wrote:I think we have a good enough squad.


You think Taylore and Gunnarson are "class" and good enough so your not the best judge of player lets be fair


Then f**k off and don't talk to me then.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:12 am

Mario wrote:Actually I lie, we spent 35 million including solksjaers signings.


What you talking about.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:14 am

Season 13/14
John Brayford £1,500,000
Steven Caulker £8,000,000
Simon Moore Undisclosed
Maximiliano Amondarain Free
Kevin Theopile Catherine £2,100,000
Peter Odemwingie £2,500,000
Andreas Cornelius £8,000,000
Gary Medel £11,000,000
Mats Daehli £1,000,000
Magnus Eikrem £2,000,000
Jo Inge Berget Undisclosed
Kenwyne Jones Swap
Fabio Minimal

£36,100,000

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:14 am

Mario wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Norwich have spent 26m
Cardiff have spent 45m (Including OGS signings before I am accused of bias)

Nearly double :lol:

And both not good enough to stay up.


We spent 35 million under mackay.


I know. Crazy to think we will probably lose half that in just 12 months.

As I said. Awful financial management of the squad. :thumbup:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 10:15 am

Mario wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Mario wrote:I think we have a good enough squad.


You think Taylore and Gunnarson are "class" and good enough so your not the best judge of player lets be fair


Then f**k off and don't talk to me then.


Make me