Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:42 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:46 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:46 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:49 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:56 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:59 pm
CantonJack wrote:f*cking hell Wez are you okay?
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:03 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:04 pm
carlccfc wrote:Wez, I totally agree many fans 'accepted' the rebrand for a debt free club and Tan must sort it out soon.
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:05 pm
wez1927 wrote:CantonJack wrote:f*cking hell Wez are you okay?
No been feeling it for a while enough is enough, time to sort it out asap issacs is a very small shareholding he could get his shares easily for the same price of everyone else sold them for ,for all the infighting the rebrand has cause it would be worth it if the debt is sorted but it hasn't and time is ticking
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:14 pm
Sven wrote:wez1927 wrote:CantonJack wrote:f*cking hell Wez are you okay?
No been feeling it for a while enough is enough, time to sort it out asap issacs is a very small shareholding he could get his shares easily for the same price of everyone else sold them for ,for all the infighting the rebrand has cause it would be worth it if the debt is sorted but it hasn't and time is ticking
Wez, perhaps the time has finally come for us wealthy fans to 'chip in' and sort the whole mess out ourselves, eh?![]()
Let us know how much YOU will be putting in and I'll see if I can round up a few more to match it![]()
That should put a fair dent in the debt mountain and make Tan sit up and take notice!![]()
Why no-one thought of this before baffles me, TBH![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:34 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:18 pm
NJ73 wrote:carlccfc wrote:Wez, I totally agree many fans 'accepted' the rebrand for a debt free club and Tan must sort it out soon.
Good luck with that
Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:44 pm
Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:55 pm
Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:16 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Michael Isaacs is only part of the holdup.
It is not mentioned that the debt to equity wont happen until the Malky issue is sorted as well?
Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:51 am
wez wally completely changed his mind then?
Sat Apr 26, 2014 2:22 am
wez1927 wrote:Sven wrote:wez1927 wrote:CantonJack wrote:f*cking hell Wez are you okay?
No been feeling it for a while enough is enough, time to sort it out asap issacs is a very small shareholding he could get his shares easily for the same price of everyone else sold them for ,for all the infighting the rebrand has cause it would be worth it if the debt is sorted but it hasn't and time is ticking
Wez, perhaps the time has finally come for us wealthy fans to 'chip in' and sort the whole mess out ourselves, eh?![]()
Let us know how much YOU will be putting in and I'll see if I can round up a few more to match it![]()
That should put a fair dent in the debt mountain and make Tan sit up and take notice!![]()
Why no-one thought of this before baffles me, TBH![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm opening up a chip shop so only a pound I've got
Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:11 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Michael Isaacs is the hold up. Sooner he stops clowning around the better
Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:24 am
Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:33 am
Forever Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Michael Isaacs is the hold up. Sooner he stops clowning around the better
Craig Honestly no one is holding it up other than Tan himself, I promise you that.
I totally agree with Wez on this.
I never accepted the despicable rebrand full stop, but many did on the grounds Tan would make us debt Free.
Its nearly 2 years now since Tan said he would make us debt Free.
The debt is anywhere between £120 mill to £150 mill.
Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:46 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Forever Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Michael Isaacs is the hold up. Sooner he stops clowning around the better
Craig Honestly no one is holding it up other than Tan himself, I promise you that.
I totally agree with Wez on this.
I never accepted the despicable rebrand full stop, but many did on the grounds Tan would make us debt Free.
Its nearly 2 years now since Tan said he would make us debt Free.
The debt is anywhere between £120 mill to £150 mill.
The debt to equity is only important to the balance sheet. Its like moving money from your left pocket to your right pocket. When it came to selling the club, everything would cost the same.
However, he did say he would do it, therefore he should do it as a lot of people accepted the rebrand based on this. When the Malky affair is sorted in the summer, there should be no reason not to do it.
infact, if the truth about Moody/Malky comes out this summer around the court hearing it would be the perfect time for Tan to do it as his standing with fans couldnt be higher and that debt to equity swap would then get even more fans behind him.
Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:29 am
Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:43 am
londonlegal wrote:And while we keep booing him every game and him with the blue chart he will hurry to do this why?
More likely he will sell the best players, take the parachute payments and walk.
Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:46 am
carlccfc wrote:Wez, I totally agree many fans 'accepted' the rebrand for a debt free club and Tan must sort it out soon.
Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:49 am
maccydee wrote:carlccfc wrote:Wez, I totally agree many fans 'accepted' the rebrand for a debt free club and Tan must sort it out soon.
But people aren't accepting the rebrand. They are protesting and wearing blue in their thousands.
That's a good thing by the way however you could see why Tan would have reservations.
Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:59 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:maccydee wrote:carlccfc wrote:Wez, I totally agree many fans 'accepted' the rebrand for a debt free club and Tan must sort it out soon.
But people aren't accepting the rebrand. They are protesting and wearing blue in their thousands.
That's a good thing by the way however you could see why Tan would have reservations.
They are wearing blue, but not protesting. Well maybe for 60 seconds each game before going back to supporting his creation.
Lets not forget blue are your away colours. To wear what is sold in the club shop is not a protest, but a decision on principle.
Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:02 am
Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:08 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Its not a protest.
The rest i see your point. However the fact he is a businessman with his and not the clubs interest at heart then surely you would understand debt to equity wont happen either way?
Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:11 am
maccydee wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Its not a protest.
The rest i see your point. However the fact he is a businessman with his and not the clubs interest at heart then surely you would understand debt to equity wont happen either way?
Yep it won't and as I said nor would I I'm his position.
We will agree to disagree about it being a protest. I think it is and I think many on here would agree.
Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:44 am
Stavross wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Michael Isaacs is only part of the holdup.
It is not mentioned that the debt to equity wont happen until the Malky issue is sorted as well?
I still don't see what issue trying to sort out the Malky settlement is in relation to Tan converting debt to equity. Surely even if the club has to pay Malky a decent amount, it will only be a few million. Christ that's small fry in comparison to the money that's been wasted i.e. administration costs.
So Tan should now sort the debt to equity as he's maintained he will do and as he stated back in August - "was very close" and "should be sorted in a couple of weeks".